Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T15:02:43.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Markedness, Neutralization, and Universal Redundancy Rules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2026

Charles E. Cairns
Charles E. Cairns*
Affiliation:
University of Texas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines ideas basic to the Praguean concepts of markedness and neutralization in the light of problems which arise in contemporary phonological theory. The partial reformulation of phonological theory suggested here goes beyond proposals by previous authors in that it provides a plausible explanation for a number of universais concerning stem-initial consonant clusters. The present proposal includes the claim that there is a universal, ordered set of redundancy rules—in the form of neutralization rules—which place constraints on the distribution of marked features in the lexicon. It is suggested that at least some of these universals are due to limitations of the peripheral speech production and perception systems.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , December 1969 , pp. 863 - 885
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fant, G. 1967. Auditory patterns of speech. In Wathen-Dunn 1967:111–25.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1965. Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant sequences. Linguistics 18.5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Stevens, K. N.. 1967. On the mechanism of glottal vibration for vowels and consonants. Quarterly Progress Report, Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT, 85.267–70.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1941. Kindersprache, Aphasie, und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Fant, Gunnar, and Halle, Morris. 1952. Preliminaries to speech analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, and Halle, Morris. 1956. Fundamentals of language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1967. Yawelmani phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, Alvin, et al. 1962. A motor theory of speech perception. Proceedings of the Speech Communication Seminar. Stockholm: Speech Transmission Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Liberman, Alvin, et al, et al. 1967. Some observations on a model for speech perception. In Wathen-Dunn 1967:68–87.Google Scholar
Öhman, S. P. G. 1966. Co-articulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements. JASA 38.151–68.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1968. Aspects of phonological theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Stanley, Richard. 1967. Redundancy rules in phonology. Lg. 43.393–436.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. N., and Halle, Morris. 1967. Remarks on analysis by synthesis and distinctive features. In Wathen-Dunn 1967:88–102.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. 1929. Zur allgemeinen Theorie der phonologischen Vokalsysteme. TCLP 1.36–97.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S.. 1931. Die phonologischen Systeme. TCLP 4.96–116.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S.. 1936a. Die phonologischen Grenzsignale. Proceedings of the Second International Congress for Phonetic Sciences, 45–9. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S.. 1936b. Die Aufhebung der phonologischen Gegensätze. TCLP 4.29–45.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S.. 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie. TCLP 8.Google Scholar
Vachek, J. 1964. A Prague school reader in linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wathen-Dunn, Weiant (ed.) 1967. Models for the perception of speech and visual form. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wang, William S-Y. 1968a. Vowel features, paired variables, and the English vowel shift. Lg. 44.695–708.Google Scholar
Wang, William S-Y.. 1968b. The basis of speech. (Project on Linguistic Analysis, Reports (2nd series), no. 4.) Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar