An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
Atkinson, Martin. 1996. The minimalist program. Concise encyclopedia of syntactic theories, ed. by Brown, K. and Miller, J., Edinburgh: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. [1955] 1975. The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986a. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986b. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1994. Bare phrase structure. Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Carlos Otero, ed. by Campos, H. and Kempchinsky, P.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 51–109.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1996. Some observations on economy in generative grammar. MIT, ms.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courant, Richard. 1937. Differential and integral calculus, vol. 1. London: Blackie & Son. (New York Review of Books, October 3, 1996, p. 56.)Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel D.1990. Differentiation and reduction in syntactic theory: A case study. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory8. 313–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Samuel D.1994. Un-principled syntax and the derivation of syntactic relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, ms. To appear in Working minimalism, ed. by Browning, M.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Freidin, Robert. 1970. Interpretive semantics and the syntax of English complement constructions. Bloomington: Indiana University dissertation.Google Scholar
Freidin, Robert. 1992. Foundations of generative syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Freidin, Robert. 1994a. Generative grammar: Principles and parameters framework. The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, ed. by Asher, R. E., 1370–85. Edinburgh: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Freidin, Robert. 1994b. Conceptual shifts in the science of grammar: 1951–1992. Noam Chomsky: Critical assessments, ed. by Otero, Carlos P., 653–90. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freidin, Robert. 1996. Binding theory on minimalist assumptions. Atomism and binding, ed. by Bennis, H., Pica, P., and Rooryck, J.Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1996. Minimizing control: A modest PROposal. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, ms.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 1996. Last resort. Minimalism and linguistic theory, ed. by Haraguchi, Shosuke and Funaki, Michio, 1–32. Tokoyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1995. The minimalist program. Government and binding theory and the minimalist program, ed. by Webelhuth, G., 349–82. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
May, Robert. 1985. Logical form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Strozer, Judith. 1994. Language acquisition after puberty. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar