Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T07:02:49.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nasal consonants and the internal structure of segments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Stephen R. Anderson
Stephen R. Anderson*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phonetic theory has generally been based on the assumption that speech can be divided into discrete segments, each phonetically homogeneous with respect to all linguistically significant parameters. Among the nasal consonants, however, are segments which must have internal sequential structure.

Primary nasal consonants are first discussed here, and it is concluded that these should be described as non-continuants. Various possible characterizations of complex nasal segments (pre- and post-nasalized stops) are then considered, and it is concluded that no feature homogeneous over the segment is adequate to describe them. The conclusion that these segments involve internal sequencing suggests that rules should exist which can produce and manipulate such intra-segmental structure. Applications of such rules are briefly suggested.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , June 1976, pp. 326 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andersen, Henning. 1972. Diphthongization. Lg. 48. 11–50.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1974. The organization of phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Arnott, D. W. 1970. The nominal and verbal systems of Fula. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Callow, J. C. 1962. The Apinayé language. University of London dissertation.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1974. Phonological features: problems and proposals. Lg. 50. 52–65.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fromm, H., and Sadeniemi, M. 1956. Finnisches Elementarbuch, I: Grammatik. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Gårding, Eva. 1973. The Scandinavian word accents. (Working papers, 8.) Lund: University Phonetics Laboratory.Google Scholar
Gudschinsky, Sarah, Popovitch, Harold; and Popovitch, Frances. 1970. Native reaction and phonetic similarity in Maxakalí phonology. Lg. 46. 77–88.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P. 1974. Reassignment of nasality in early Irish. Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology, ed. by Bruck, A. et al., 127–30. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Herbert, Robert K. 1975. Reanalyzing prenasalized consonants. Studies in African Linguistics 6. 105–24.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, and Halle, Morris. 1968. Phonology in relation to phonetics. Manual of phonetics, ed. by Malmberg, B., 411–49. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen. 1974. Segments with internal structure: Greek labiovelars. Paper read to 5th Annual Meeting, Northeast Linguistic Society, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. How abstract is phonology? Three dimensions of linguistic theory, ed. by Fujimura, O., 5–56. Tokyo: TEC.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1972. Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leben, William R. 1972. Suprasegmental phonology. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Lewis, Henry, and Pedersen, Holger. 1961. A concise comparative Celtic grammar. 2nd ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1967. Further revisions of the Finnish rules. MS. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1970. A note on tone in Tiv conjugation. Studies in African Linguistics 1. 123–9.Google Scholar
Milner, G. B. 1956. Fijian grammar. Suva, Fiji: Government Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, John. 1974. Phonetic explanation of nasal sound patterns. Paper read to Nasalfest, Berkeley, 23 November.Google Scholar
Petrovici, Emil. 1930. De la nasalité en roumain: recherches experimentales. Cluj: Institutul de Arte Grafice ‘Ardealul’.Google Scholar
Rivas, Alberto. 1974. Nasalization in Guaraní. Paper read to 5th Annual Meeting, Northeast Linguistic Society, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Salzer, J. K. Jr. 1971. Cubeo phonemics. Linguistics 75. 74–9.Google Scholar
Samarin, W. J. 1966. The Gbeya language. (UCPL 44.) Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scott, N. C. 1964. Nasal consonants in Land Dayak (Bukar-Sadong). In honor of Daniel Jones, ed. by Abercrombie, D. et al., 432–6. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Wang, William S-Y. 1967. The phonological features of tone. IJAL 33. 93–105.Google Scholar
Wiesemann, Ursula. 1972. Die phonologische und grammatische Struktur der Kaingang-Sprache. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Woo, Nancy. 1969. Prosody and phonology. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar