Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T13:04:56.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Negative grammatical functions in Skou

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Mark Donohue
Mark Donohue*
Affiliation:
Monash University
*
Linguistics Program, School of Languages, Cultures, and Linguistics, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia, [mark@donohue.cc]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Negation is known to correlate with changes of word order, agreement, or case marking in the clause. I present data from Skou, a language of north-central New Guinea, which show obliques and adjuncts appearing postverbally in the SOV positive clause and preverbally in negative clauses. Moreover, in addition to these changes in the order of constituents, the grammatical functions assigned in the negated clause are not the same as in a positive clause, with obliques and adjuncts assuming object properties in the negated clause, as well as object positions. This results in otherwise unattested trivalent constructions in the language.

Information

Type
Short Report
Information
Language , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 383 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aissen, Judith. 1999. Markedness and subject choice in optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17.4.673–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Harbert, Wayne, Hermon, Gabriella; and Sridhar, Shikaripur. 1980. The acquisition of subjecthood. Language 56. 719–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, H. K. J. 1952. Een toon-taal in Nederlandsch Nieuw Guinea. Tijdschrift Nieuw Guinea 13. 55–60.Google Scholar
Donohue, Cathryn, and Donohue, Mark. 2004. On the special status of instrumentals. Proceedings of the LFG '04 Conference, ed. by Butt, Miriam and King, Tracy Holloway, 209–25. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. Online: http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/site/ONLN.html.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 2000. One phrase structure. Proceedings of ALS2k, the 2000 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, ed. by Allan, Keith and Henderson, John. Melbourne: University of Melbourne. Online: http://www.arts.monash.edu.au/ling/archive/als2000/proceedings.html.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 2001. Coding choices in argument structure: Austronesian applicatives in texts. Studies in Language 25.2.217–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 2002. Which sounds change: Descent and borrowing in the Skou family. Oceanic Linguistics 41.1.157–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 2003a. Negation and grammatical functions in Skou. Proceedings of ALS2002, the 2002 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, ed. by Collins, Peter and Amberber, Mengistu. Sydney: University of New South Wales. Online: http://www.als.asn.au/.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 2003b. The tonal system of Skou, New Guinea. Proceedings of the symposium Cross-linguistic Studies of Tonal Phenomena: Historical development, phonetics of tone, and descriptive studies, ed. by Kaji, Shigeki, 329–55. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, Research Institute for Language and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 2003c. Agreement in the Skou language: A historical account. Oceanic Linguistics 42.2.479–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 2005. Configurationality in the languages of New Guinea. Australian Journal of Linguistics 25.2.237–74.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 2006. Argument structure and adjuncts: Perspectives from Northern New Guinea. Paper presented to BLS 32, Parasession on Argument Structure.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark, and Roque, Lila San. 2004. I'saka: A sketch grammar of a language of north-central New Guinea. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Foley, William A., and Van Valin, Robert D. Jr., 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56.2.251–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Ed, and Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 63–100.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda. 1984. The syntax of verbs. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. 1997. Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. (ed.) 1983. Studies in relational grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reesink, Ger P. 2002. Clause-final negation: Structure and interpretation. Functions of Language 9.2.239–68.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1991. Grammaticalization of topic into subject. Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 2, ed. by Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Heine, Bernd, 93–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr., , and LaPolla, Randy J.. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voorhoeve, C. L. 1971. Miscellaneous notes on languages in West Irian. Papers in New Guinea linguistics 14. 47–114. (Pacific Linguistics A-28.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar