Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T22:40:10.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Approach to Tone in Luganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Larry M. Hyman and
Francis X. Katamba
Larry M. Hyman*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Francis X. Katamba*
Affiliation:
University of Lancaster
*
Larry M. Hyman, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Francis X. Katamba, Department of Modern English Language, University of Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YT, England
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since McCawley 1970, the Luganda tone system has been well known for its property of allowing at most one H[igh] to L[ow] pitch drop per word. To account for this property, the underlying system has been analyzed both in terms of underlying accents of various kinds (e.g. diacritic) and in terms of underlying tone (e.g. H vs. 0). Most accentual proposals, however, fail to account for the fact that THREE marks are necessary to characterize the high to low ‘melody’: a mark for the first H mora, a mark for the place of the H-to-L drop, and a mark for the place of the last L mora. After evaluating previous accentual and tonal analyses, we present a new approach to tone in Luganda that integrates tone and accent in the following way: (i) Accent in Luganda consists of designating certain moras as metrically strong (and hence capable of attracting tone); (ii) Tone in Luganda consists of lexical and grammatical occurrences of underlying HL contours (or ‘potential pitch drops‘). This new analysis, which continues to recognize the importance of the H to L pitch drop, provides additional evidence for the coexistence of tone and accent, which may interact in complex ways in the same language.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , March 1993, pp. 34 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Archangeli, Diana. 1984. Underspecification in Yawelmani phonology and morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana, and Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1984. Extratonality and Japanese accent. University of Arizona and University of Southern California, ms.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana, and Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1986. The content and structure of phonological representations. University of Arizona and University of Southern California, ms. (Forthcoming, M.I.T. Press.).Google Scholar
Bastin, Y. 1983. La finale verbale -ide et l'imbrication en bantou. Tervuren: Annales du Musée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale, Série IN-8, Sciences Humaines–N. 114.Google Scholar
Batibo, Herman. 1976. A new approach to Sukuma tone. Studies in Bantu tonology, ed. by Hyman, Larry M., 241–57. (Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 3.) Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Batibo, Herman. 1985. Le kesukuma, langue bantu de Tanzanie. (Cahiers no. 17.) Paris: Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations.Google Scholar
Bennett, Patrick R. 1978. The role of stress and intonation in early Proto-Bantu. University of Wisconsin-Madison, ms.Google Scholar
Clark, Mary. 1976. A dynamic treatment of tone, with special attention to the tonal system of Igbo. Amherst: University of Massachusetts dissertation.Google Scholar
Clark, Mary. 1987. Japanese as a tone language. Issues in Japanese linguistics, ed. by Imai, Takashi and Saito, Mamoru, 53–105. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. N. 1986. Compensatory lengthening and consonant gemination in LuGanda. Studies in compensatory lengthening, ed. by Wetzels, Leo and Sezer, Engin, 37–77. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. N., and Goldsmith, John (eds.) 1984. Autosegmental studies in Bantu tone. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Desmond T. 1967. Some features of Ganda linguistic structure. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
Downing, Laura. 1990. Local and metrical tone shift in Nguni. Studies in African Linguistics 21, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. dissertation. [Published, New York: Garland, 1979.].Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1984. Tone and accent in Tonga. In Clements & Goldsmith, 19–51.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1985. On tone in Sukuma. African linguistics, ed. by Goyvaerts, Didier L., 167–87. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1987. Stem tone patterns of the interlacustrine Bantu languages. Current approaches to African linguistics 4, ed. by Odden, David, 167–77. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John, Peterson, Karen; and Drogo, Joseph. 1989. Tone and accent in the Xhosa verbal system. Current approaches to African linguistics 5, ed. by Newman, Paul and Botne, Robert D., 157–78. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Haraguchi, Shosuke. 1977. The tone pattern of Japanese: An autosegmental theory of tone. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Heny, Frank. 1971. Explanatory tone-assignment rules in Bantu. Papers in African linguistics, ed. by Kim, C-W. and Stahlke, H., 175–99. Edmonton: Linguistic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
Heny, Frank. 1974. Ganda tone as ‘pitch accent’. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, ms.Google Scholar
Heny, Frank, and Wheeler, Deirdre. 1982. A categorial analysis of Luganda tone. University of Groningen, ms.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1978. Tone and/or accent. Elements of tone, stress and intonation, ed. by Napoli, Donna Jo, 1–20. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1982. Globality and the accentual analysis of Luganda tone. Journal of Linguistic Research 2. 1–40.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1988. Direct vs. indirect syntactic conditioning of phonological rules. Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 4. 147–63.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1989. Accent in Bantu: An appraisal. Proceedings of the 20th A.C.A.L., ed. by Bokamba, E., Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 19(2). 111–28.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1993. Register tones and tonal geometry. The representation of tonal register, ed. by Snider, Keith and van, Harry Hulst, der. Dordrecht: Foris, in press.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M., and Byarushengo, Ernest Rugwa. 1984. A model of Haya tonology. In Clements & Goldsmith, 53–103.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M., and Katamba, Francis X. 1990. Final vowel shortening in Luganda. Studies in African Linguistics 21. 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M., and Katamba, Francis X. 1990–91. The augment in Luganda tonology. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 12. 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M., Katamba, Francis X.; and Walusimbi, Livingstone. 1987. Luganda and the strict layer hypothesis. Phonology Yearbook 4. 87–108.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M., and Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1988. On feature copying: Parameters of tone rules. Language, speech and mind: Studies in honour of Victoria A. Fromkin, ed. by Hyman, Larry M. and Li, Charles N., 30–48. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M., and Schuh, Russell G. 1974. Universals of tone rules: Evidence from West Africa. Linguistic Inquiry 5. 81–115.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M., and Valinande, Nzama. 1985. Globality in the Kinande tone system. African linguistics, ed. by Goyvaerts, Didier L., 239–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon. 1987. Tone feature geometry. North Eastern Linguistic Society 18. 223–37.Google Scholar
Kalema, John. 1977. The irrelevance of tone class D in Luganda. African Studies 36. 187–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katamba, Francis. 1974. Luganda morphology and phonology. University of Lancaster, ms.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1989. Accent and tone in Kizigua—a Bantu language. Certamen phonologicum 1, ed. by Bertinetto, P. M. and Lopocaro, M., 177–88. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Kidima, Lukowa. 1989. Tone and syntax in Kiyaka. The phonology-syntax connection, ed. by Inkelas, Sharon and Zec, Draga, 195–216. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical phonology and morphology. Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by Yang, I.-S., 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1985. Some consequences of lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 85–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles W. 1984. Digo tonology. In Clements & Goldsmith, 105–82.Google Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles W. 1989. Metrical structure in Chizigula tonology. Urbana: University of Illinois, ms.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1968. The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1970. Some tonal systems that come close to being pitch accent, but don't quite make it. Chicago Linguistic Society 6. 526–32.Google Scholar
Meeussen, A. E. 1961. Le ton des extensions verbales en bantou. Orbis 10. 424–27.Google Scholar
Meeussen, A. E. 1963. Morphotonology of the Tonga verb. Journal of African Languages 2. 72–92.Google Scholar
Meeussen, A. E. 1965. A preliminary analysis of Ganda verb forms. Journal of African Languages 4. 108–13.Google Scholar
Meeussen, A. E. 1966. Syntactic tones of nouns in Ganda: A preliminary synthesis. Recherches Linguistiques en Belgique, ed. by Lebrun, Yvan, 77–86. Universa Wetteren.Google Scholar
Meeussen, A. E. 1972. Japanese accentuation as a restricted tone system. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 1. 267–70.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. 1986. The theory of lexical phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Mutaka, Ngessimo. 1990. The lexical tonology of Kinande. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.Google Scholar
Odden, David. 1985. An accentual approach to tone in Kimatuumbi. African linguistics, ed. by Goyvaerts, Didier L., 345–419. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odden, David. 1988. Kimatuumbi phonology and morphology. Columbus: Ohio State University, ms.Google Scholar
Poser, William. 1984. The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1986. Tone in lexical phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rialland, Annie. 1988. Systèmes prosodiques africains. Nice: Thèse du Doctorat d'Etat, Université de Nice.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 1987. Metrical structure in a tone language: The foot in Slave. Chicago Linguistic Society 23, Parasession on autosegmental and metrical phonology, ed. by Bosch, A., Need, B., and Schiller, E., 239–53.Google Scholar
Stevick, E. W. 1969. Pitch and duration in Ganda. Journal of African Languages 8. 1–28.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. N. 1962. The syllable in Luganda: A prosodic account. Journal of African Languages 1. 122–66.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. N. 1967. Introduction to R. A. Snoxall, Luganda-English dictionary, xiii–xxxv. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Martha. 1988. A level-based model for pitch accent languages. Autosegmental studies on pitch accent, ed. by van, Harry Hulst, der and Smith, Norval, 295–316. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1988a. Template morphology and the direction of association. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 551–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1988b. Contour tones. Phonology 6. 149–74.Google Scholar