Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T02:08:10.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nominal Tense? The Meaning of GuaranÍ Nominal Temporal Markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Judith Tonhauser
Judith Tonhauser*
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
*
Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State University, 222 Oxley Hall, 1712 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH 43210-1298
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Paraguayan Guaraní has nominal markers that affect the temporal interpretation of the noun phrase they attach to. On the basis of data collected during recent fieldwork in Paraguay, I explore in this article the lexical semantic, semantic, and discourse properties of these nominal temporal markers and develop a semantic analysis that accounts for their meaning and use. I then address the claim (made e.g. in Nordlinger & Sadler 2004) that such markers are nominal past and future tenses. A comparison of the properties of verbal temporal markers to those of the Guaraní nominal markers reveals that the Guaraní nominal markers share few of the properties of verbal tenses and hence should not be called nominal tenses. I conclude by addressing the implications of these findings for theories of temporality.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 83 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 831 - 869
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aguilera, Domingo Adolfo. 1998. Pukarã: Chistes folclóricos Paraguayos. 2nd edn. Asunción, Paraguay: Servilibro.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2003. A grammar of Tariana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen. 1985. Typological distinctions in word formation. Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3, ed. by Shopen, Timothy, 3–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 2006. On the tense-aspect system of Bolivian Chaco Guaraní. Guaraní y Mawetí-Tupí-Guaraní: Estudios históricos y descriptivos sobre una familia lingüística de América del Sur, ed. by Dietrich, Wolf and Symeonidis, Haralambos, 105–67. Münster: LIT.Google Scholar
Bittner, Maria. 2008. Aspectual universals of temporal anaphora. Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect, ed. by Rothstein, Susan, 349–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, to appear.Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul. 1996. Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition 60. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, Strang. 1997. Past tense on nouns as death, destruction, and loss. North Eastern Linguistic Society 27. 65–77.Google Scholar
Carlin, Eithne. 2006. Feeling the need: The borrowing of Cariban functional categories into Mawayana (Arawak). Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology (Explorations in linguistic typology 4), ed. by Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W., 313–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory Norman. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra, and Timberlake, Alan. 1985. Tense, aspect and mood. Language typology and syntactic description, ed. by Shopen, Timothy, 202–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colijn, Erika, and Tonhauser, Judith. 2007. Word order in Paraguayan Guaraní. Columbus: The Ohio State University, ms.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida. 1996. A cross-linguistic asymmetry in the temporal interpretation of DPs. Proceedings of the thirteenth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL '96), ed. by Green, Antony Dubach and Motapanyane, Virginia, 70–81. Ithaca, NY: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida. 1997. On the temporal location of predication times: The role of determiners in Lillooet Salish. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 16. 129–43.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond. 1996. Carib. The Amazonian languages, ed. by Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra, 23–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Wolf. 1990. More evidence for an internal classification of Tupí-Guaraní languages. Berlin: Ibero-Amerikanisches Institut.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2004. The Jarawara language of Southern Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1982. Tenses, time adverbs, and compositional semantic theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 5. 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David R., Wall, Robert E.; and Peters, Stanley. 1981. Introduction to Montague semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Enç, Mürvet, 1981. Tense without scope: An analysis of nouns as indexicals. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Madison dissertation.Google Scholar
Enç, Mürvet. 1986. Towards a referential analysis of temporal expressions. Linguistics and Philosophy 9. 405–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enç, Mürvet. 1987. Anchoring conditions for tense. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 633–57.Google Scholar
Freeland, L. S. 1951. Language of the Sierra Miwok. (Indiana University publications in anthropology and linguistics, Memoir 6 of the International Journal of American Linguistics.) Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Gennari, Silvia. 2001. Tense, aspect and aktionsart in Spanish and Japanese. Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 11. 60–84.Google Scholar
Gennari, Silvia. 2003. Tense meaning and temporal interpretation. Journal of Semantics 20. 35–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregores, Emma, and Suárez, Jorge A.. 1961. A description of colloquial Guaraní. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University dissertation.Google Scholar
Gregores, Emma, and Suárez, Jorge A.. 1967. A description of colloquial Guaraní. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haude, Katharina. 2004. Nominal tense marking in Movima. Linguistics in the Netherlands 21. 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haude, Katharina. 2006. A grammar of Movima. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen dissertation.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, Erhard. 1986. Temporal anaphora in discourses of English. Linguistics and Philosophy 9. 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamp, Hans, and Reyle, Uwe. 1993. From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Keil, Frank. 1989. Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. The notional category of modality. Words, worlds, and contexts: New approaches in word semantics, ed. by Eikmeyer, Hans-Jürgen and Rieser, Hannes, 38–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. Modality. Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, ed. by von Stechow, Arnim and Wunderlich, Dieter, 639–50. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. The generic book, ed. by Carlson, Gregory Norman and Pelletier, Francis Jeffry, 125–75. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 8, ed. by Strolovitch, Devon and Lawson, Aaron, 92–110. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. Semantics and contextual expressions, ed. by Bartsch, Renate, van Benthem, Johan, and van, Peter Boas, Emde, 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1992. Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and event domains. Lexical matters, ed. by Sag, Ivan and Szabolsci, Anna, 29–54. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kroeker, Menno. 2001. A descriptive grammar of Nambikuara. International Journal of American Linguistics 67. 1–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard, and Cho, Sungeun. 2003. Temporal adjectives and possessive DPs. Natural Language Semantics 11. 217–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecarme, Jacqueline. 1996. Tense in the nominal system: The Somali DP. Studies in Afroasiatic grammar, ed. by Lecarme, Jacqueline, Lowenstamm, Jean, and Shlonsky, Ur, 159–78. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Lecarme, Jacqueline. 1999. Nominal tense and tense theory. Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 2: Papers from CSSP 1997, ed. by Corblin, Francis, Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen, and Marandin, Jean-Marie, 333–54. The Hague: Thesus.Google Scholar
Lecarme, Jacqueline. 2004. Tense in nominals. The syntax of time, ed. by Guéron, Jacqueline and Lecarme, Jacqueline, 440–75. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian, and Moravcsik, Edith. 2000. Noun. Morphologie/Morphology, ed. by Lehmann, Christian, Booij, Geert, and Mugdan, Joachim, 732–57. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Liuzzi, Silvio. 1987. Temps et aspect en Guaraní. Paris: University of Paris IV, Sorbonne dissertation.Google Scholar
Liuzzi, Silvio, and Kirtchuk, Pablo. 1989. Tiempo y aspecto en Guaraní. Amerindia 14. 9–42.Google Scholar
Lowe, Ivan. 1999. Nambiquara. The Amazonian languages, ed. by Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra, 269–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa. 2005. On the absence of tense on determiners. Lingua 115. 1697–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melià, Bartomeu, Farré, Luis; and Pérez, Alfonso. 1997. El Guaraní a su Alcance. 14th edn. Asuncion, Paraguay: Centro de Estudios Paraguayos ‘Antonio Guasch.‘.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1991. Active/agentive case marking and its motivations. Language 67. 510–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montague, Richard. 1973. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. Approaches to natural language: Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics, ed. by Hintikka, Jaako, Moravcsik, Julius, and Suppes, Patrick, 212–42. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Musan, Renate. 1995. On the temporal interpretation of noun phrases. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Musan, Renate. 1999. Temporal interpretation and information-status of noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 22. 621–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhoff, Sebastian. 2004. Nomen/Verb-Distinktion im Guaraní. Cologne: University of Cologne masters thesis.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel, and Sadler, Louisa. 2004. Nominal tense in crosslinguistic perspective. Language 80. 776–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara Hall. 1973. Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. Journal of Philosophy 70. 601–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara Hall. 1984. Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7. 243–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul. 1998. The progressive in modal semantics. Language 74. 760–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor, and Mervis, Carolyn B.. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7. 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlota. 1991. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, Elizabeth, Kestenbaum, Roberta, Simons, Daniel J.; and Wein, Debra. 1995. Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 13. 113–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, Robert J. 1982. Natural, unnatural and supernatural concepts. Cognitive Psychology 14. 451–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Matthew. 1997. The anaphoric parallel between modality and tense. (Technical report IRCS 97–6.) Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. Online: http://www.cs.rutgers.edu/~mdstone/pubs/ircs97-06.pdf.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim. 1996. The phrase structure of tense. Phrase structure and the lexicon, ed. by Rooryck, Johan and Zaring, Laurie, 277–91. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 1985. The semantic variability of absolute constructions. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2002. A dynamic semantic account of the temporal interpretation of noun phrases. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 12, ed. by Jackson, Brendan, 286–305. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2006. The temporal semantics of noun phrases: Evidence from Guaraní. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2007. Temporal reference in Paraguayan Guaraní. Columbus: The Ohio State University, ms.Google Scholar
Velázquez-Castillo, Maura. 1996. The grammar of possession: Inalienability, incorporation and possessor ascension in Guaraní. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velázquez-Castillo, Maura. 2002. Grammatical relations in active systems: The case of Guaraní. Functions of Language 9. 133–67.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2003. On the interpretability of tense on D and its consequences for case theory. Lingua 113. 659–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagona, Karen. 1995. Temporal argument structure: Configurational elements of construal. Temporal reference, aspect and actionality, vol. 1: Semantic and syntactic perspectives, ed. by Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Bianchi, Valentina, Higginbotham, James, and Squartini, Mario, 397–410. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar