Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T12:22:52.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Gahl and Garnsey on grammar and usage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Frederick J. Newmeyer
Frederick J. Newmeyer*
Affiliation:
University of Washington
*
Department of Linguistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-4340, [fjn@u.washington.edu]
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Discussion Notes
Information
Language , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , June 2006, pp. 399 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bybee, Joan L., and Hopper, Paul (eds.) 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Gahl, Susanne, and Garnsey, Susan M.. 2004. Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation. Language 80. 748–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnsey, Susan M., Pearlmutter, Neal J., Myers, Elizabeth; and Lotocky, Melanie A.. 1997. The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 37. 58–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10. 279–326.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1921/1964. Language: Its nature, development and origin. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lavandera, Beatriz R. 1978. Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7. 171–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, Willem J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montague, Richard. 1974. Formal philosophy: Selected papers. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2001. Grammatical functions, thematic roles, and phrase structure: Their underlying disunity. Objects and other subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality, ed. by Davies, William and Dubinsky, Stanley, 53–75. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2003. Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language 79. 682–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oehrle, Richard. 1977. Review of Semantics and syntactic regularity, by Green, Georgia. Language 53. 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David M. 1982. Paths and categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Tomlin, Russell S. 1986. Basic word order: Functional principles. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Trueswell, John C. 1996. The role of lexical frequency in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 35. 566–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasow, Thomas. 1976. McCawley on generative semantics. Linguistic Analysis 2. 279–301.Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas. 2002. Postverbal behavior. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 203–38.Google Scholar