An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
Lee, Rob, Jonathan, Philip; and Ziman, Pauline. 2010a. Pictish symbols revealed as a written language through application of Shannon entropy. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences466. 2545–60. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2010.0041.Google Scholar
Lee, Rob, Jonathan, Philip; and Ziman, Pauline. 2010b. A response to Richard Sproat on random systems, writing, and entropy. Computational Linguistics36. 791–94. DOI: 10.1162/coli_c_00029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, Rajesh. 2010. Probabilistic analysis of an ancient undeciphered script. IEEE Computer43.3.76–80. DOI: 10.1109/MC.2010.112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, Rajesh, Lee, Rob, Yadav, Nisha, Vahia, Mayank, Jonathan, Philip; and Ziman, Pauline. 2015. On statistical measures and ancient writing systems. Language 91.4. e198-e205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, Rajesh, Yadav, Nisha, Vahia, Mayank, Joglekar, Hrishikesh, Adhikari, R.; and Mahadevan, Iravatham. 2009. Entropic evidence for linguistic structure in the Indus script. Science324. 1165. DOI: 10.1126/science.1170391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sproat, Richard. 2010. Ancient symbols, computational linguistics, and the reviewing practices of the general science journals. Computational Linguistics36. 585–94. DOI: 10.1162/coli_a_00011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sproat, Richard. 2014. A statistical comparison of written language and nonlinguistic symbol systems. Language90.2.457–81. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2014.0031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar