No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
On the cognitive basis of contact-induced sound change: Vowel merger reversal in Shanghainese
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2026
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
This study investigates the source and status of a recent sound change in Shanghainese (Wu, Sinitic) that has been attributed to language contact with Mandarin. The change involves two vowels, /e/ and /ε/, reported to be merged three decades ago but produced distinctly in contemporary Shanghainese. Results of two production experiments show that speaker age, language mode (monolingual Shanghainese vs. bilingual Shanghainese-Mandarin), and crosslinguistic phonological similarity all influence the production of these vowels. These findings provide evidence for language contact as a linguistic means of merger reversal and are consistent with the view that contact phenomena originate from cross-language interaction within the bilingual mind.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2016 Linguistic Society of America
References
Antoniou, Mark, Best, Catherine T., Tyler, Michael D.; and Kroos, Christian. 2011. Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. Journal of Phonetics 39. 55. 8–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antoniou, Mark, Tyler, Michael D.; and Best, Catherine T.. 2012. Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop-voicing differently according to language mode? Journal of Phonetics 40. 582–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.05.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baayen, R. Harald, Davidson, Douglas J.; and Bates, Douglas Μ.. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59. 390–412. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranowski, Maciej. 2007. Phonological variation and change in the dialect of Charleston, South Carolina. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin; and Bolker, Ben. 2011. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-39. Online: http://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T., and Tyler, Michael D.. 2007. Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege, ed. by Bohn, Ocke-Schwen and Munro, Murray J., 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul, and Weenink, David. 2011. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.3. Online: http://www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Bullock, Barbara e., Toribio, Almeida Jacqueline, González, Verónica; and Dalola, Amanda. 2006. Language dominance and performance outcomes in bilingual pronunciation. Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference, ed. by O’Brien, Mary Grantham, Shea, Christine, and Archibald, John, 9–16. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Cao, Jianfen, and Maddieson, Ian. 1992. An exploration of phonation types in Wu dialects of Chinese. Journal of Phonetics 20. 139–60.Google Scholar
Caramazza, Alfonso, Laudanna, Alessandro; and Romani, Cristina. 1988. Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition 28. 297–332. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, Charles В. 2010. First language phonetic drift during second language acquisition. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Chang, Charles В. 2012. Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production. Journal of Phonetics 40. 249–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1928. Xiandai wuyu yanjiu [Analysis of modern Wu dialect]. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Yiya. 2008. The acoustic realization of vowels of Shanghai Chinese. Journal of Phonetics 36. 629–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Zhongmin. 1995. Shanghai shiqu hua yuyin yibai duo nian lai de yanbian [Phonetic variation of the Shanghai dialect in urban districts in the past 100 years]. Wuyu he minyu de bijiao yanjiu [Comparative studies among Wu and Min dialects], ed. by Mei, Tsu-Lin, 18–31. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.Google Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia G. 2013. Modeling multi-level factors using linear mixed effects. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 19:060028. DOI: 10.1121/1.4799729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Leeuw, Esther, Schmid, Monika S.; and Mennen, Ineke. 2010. The effects of contact on native language pronunciation in an L2 migrant setting. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13. 33–40. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728909990289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duanmu, San. 1990. A formal study of syllable, tone, stress and domain in Chinese languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Duanmu, San. 2007. The phonology of standard Chinese. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duanmu, San. 2014. Syllable structure and stress. The handbook of Chinese linguistics, ed. by James Huang, C.-T., Li, Yen-Hui Audrey, and Simpson, Andrew, 422–42. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Edkins, Joseph. 1868. A grammar of colloquial Chinese, as exhibited in the Shanghai dialect. 2nd edn. Shanghai: Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A., and Farwell, Carol В.. 1975. Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language 51. 419–39. Online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/412864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James Emil. 1987. The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 15. 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James Emil. 1995. Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, ed. by Strange, Winifred, 233–72. Baltimore: York.Google Scholar
Flege, James Emil. 1996. English vowel productions by Dutch talkers: More evidence for the ‘similar’ vs ‘new’ distinction. Second-language speech: Structure and process, ed. by James, Allan R. and Leather, Jonathan, 11–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Forster, Jonathan С. 2008. DMDX. Version 3.2.6.3. Online: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~kforster/dmdx/dmdx.htm.Google Scholar
Garde, Paul. 1961. Réflexions sur les différences phonétiques entre les langues slaves. Word 17. 34–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldrick, Matthew, Runnqvist, Elin; and Costa, Albert. 2014. Language switching makes pronunciation less nativelike. Psychological Science 25. 1–6. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613520014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, Matthew, and Ladefoged, Peter. 2001. Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics 29. 383–406. DOI: 10.1006/jpho.2001.0147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, François. 2001. The bilingual’s language modes. One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing, ed. by Nicol, Janet L., 1–22. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gu, Qin. 2007. The influence of language contact on the phonetic evolution of the dialects in Shanghai urban districts. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University dissertation.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. 1990. The sociolinguistic types of language change. Diachronica 7. 47–67. DOI: 10.1075/dia.7.1.04guy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasselmo, Nils. 1970. Code-switching and modes of speaking. Texas studies in bilingualism, ed. by Gilbert, Glenn G., 179–210. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, Yuchau E. 2002. Glide, syllable and tone: An introduction. Chinese Phonology. 11. 1–6.Google Scholar
Ihalainen, Ossi. 1994. The dialects of England since 1776. English in Britain and overseas: Origins and development, ed. by Burchfield, Robert, 197–274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karlgren, Bernhard. 1926. Études sur la phonologie chinoise. (Archives d’études orientales, t. XV, 1-2.) Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei. 2006. The role of social factors in the dynamics of sound change: A case study of a Russian dialect. Language Variation and Change 18. 99–119. DOI: 10.1017/S0954394506060030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1975. On the use of the present to explain the past. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguists, ed. by Heilmann, Luigi, vol. 2, 825–51. Bologna: Mulino.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1: Internal factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Karen, Mark; and Miller, Corey. 1991. Near-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast. Language Variation and Change 3. 33–74. DOI: 10.1017/S0954394500000442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Li-Fang, and Hsu, Huiju. 2013. Contact-induced sound change: Analysis of the alveolar lateral fricative in Yami. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 4. 31–50. DOI: 10.12697/jeful.2013.4.2.02.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H and H theory. Speech production and speech modeling, ed. by Hardcastle, William J. and Marchal, Alain, 403–39. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lotto, Andrew j., Holt, Lori L.; and Kluender, Keith R.. 1997. Effect of voice quality on perceived height of English vowels. Phonetica 54. 76–93. DOI: 10.1159/000262212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, Robert, Price, Sacha; and Mennen, Ineke. 2012. First language attrition in the speech of Dutch-English bilinguals: The case of monozygotic twin sisters. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15. 687–700. DOI: 10.1017/S136672891100071X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metsala, Jamie L., and Walley, Amanda С.. 1998. Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. Word recognition in beginning literacy, ed. by Metsala, Jamie L. and Ehri, Linnea C., 89–120. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Michelena, Luis. 1957. Las antiguas consonantes vascas. Miscelánea homenaje a A. Martinet, vol. 1, ed. by Catalán, Diego, 113–57. La Laguna: Universidad de La Laguna.Google Scholar
Moon, Seung-Jae, and Lindblom, Björn. 1994. Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96. 40–55. DOI: 10.1121/1.410492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Naomi. 1997. Modeling contact-induced language change. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4. 399–418. Online: http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol4/iss1/22/.Google Scholar
Olson, Daniel J. 2013. Bilingual language switching and selection at the phonetic level: Asymmetrical transfer in VOT production. Journal of Phonetics 41. 407–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, Nattalia. 2011. Interactions in bilingual speech processing. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University dissertation.Google Scholar
Qian, Nairong. 2003. Shanghai yuyan fazhan shi [History of the Shanghainese language]. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Online: http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Ratte, Alexander Takenobu. 2011. Contact-induced phonological change in Taiwanese. Columbus: The Ohio State University master’s thesis.Google Scholar
Ren, Nianqi. 1987. An acoustic study of Shanghai stops. Storrs: University of Connecticut dissertation.Google Scholar
Sancier, Michele L., and Fowler, Carol A.. 1997. Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics 27. 421–36. DOI: 10.1006/jpho.1997.0051.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2002. Linguistic outcomes of language contact. The handbook of language variation and change, vol. 1, ed. by Chambers, Jack K., Trudgill, Peter, and Schilling-Estes, Natalie, 638–68. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Shen, Tong. 1981. Shanghaihua laopai xinpai de chabie [Differences between old and new varieties of Shanghainese]. Fangyan [Dialect] 1981-4.275-83.Google Scholar
Shen, Zhongwei, Wooters, Charles; and Wang, William S.-Y.. 1987. Closure duration in the classification of stops: A statistical analysis. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 35. 197–209.Google Scholar
Shi, Rujie, and Jiang, Jianping. 1987. Shanghai shiqu zhongnianren yuyin gongshi chayi de wubai ren diaocha [A survey of phonetic variation among 500 middle-aged speakers in urban districts of Shanghai]. Yuyan Yanjiu Jikan [Collected Papers on Language Studies] 1. 271–96. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Stanley Smith, Volkmann, John; and Newman, Edwin b.. 1937. A scale for the measurement of the psychological magnitude pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 8. 185–90. DOI: 10.1121/1.1915893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svantesson, Jan-Olof. 1989. Shanghai vowels. Lund Working Papers in Linguistics 35. 191–202. Online: http://cts.lub.lu.se/ojs/index.php/LWPL/article/view/2608.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham. 2000. Voice quality differences and the origin of diphthongs. Berkeley Linguistics Society 26. 295–303. DOI: 10.3765/bls.v26i1.1162.Google Scholar
Toribio, Almeida Jacqueline, Bullock, Barbara e., Botero, Christopher g.; and Davis, Kristopher Allen. 2005. Perseverative phonetic effects in bilingual code-switching. Theoretical and experimental approaches to Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, ed. by Gess, Randall and Rubin, Edward J., 291–306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trask, R. L. 2000. The dictionary of historical and comparative linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Coetsem, Frans. 1988. Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Providence, RI: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1968. Languages in contact: Findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William; and Herzog, Marvin I.. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2005. Contact-induced changes: Classification and processes. Diachronica 22. 373–427. DOI: 10.1075/dia.22.2.05win.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Zongji (ed.) 1986. Hanyu putonghua danyinjie yutu ce [The spectrographic album of monosyllables of standard Chinese]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Baohua, and Tang, Zhenzhu (eds.) 1988. Shanghai shiqu fangyan zhi [Documentation of the Shanghai dialect in urban districts]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Baohua, Tang, Zhenzhu; and Tang, Zhixiang. 1986. Shanghai shiqu shaonian suo shiyong de shanghaihua yuyin [Phonetics of the Shanghainese spoken by teenagers]. Yuwen Luncong [Collections of Chinese Studies] 3. 112–20. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.Google Scholar
Yao and Chang supplementary material
Yao and Chang supplementary material
File
393 KB
You have
Access
- 32
- Cited by