Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:09:03.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Grammatical Status of Names

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

John M. Anderson
John M. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Methoni Messinias, Greece
*
PO Box 348, Methoni Messinias, 24006 Greece [frohn@otenet.gr]
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article focuses on the relatively neglected grammar of names, including their morphosyntax, which has not aroused the kind of interest and controversy associated with the (putative) semantics of names. It also focuses on a few Indo-European languages (French, Greek, and particularly English), but refers to a wider range of language types. While not an exhaustive account of the variations in name syntax and morphology, significant variation is nevertheless encountered and analyzed. The suggested universal aspects have some plausibility. I propose that names belong universally, with pronouns and determiners, to a category of determinative. The behavior of names as vocatives and in predications of nomination suggests that they are, unlike pronouns and determiners, inherently neither definite nor indefinite. Moreover, in such circumstances names do not function as regular arguments of the predicator; they do not bear a specified semantic relation to the predicator: they are either EXTRASENTENTIAL or appositive. In order to figure as arguments in other types of predication, and be assigned a specified semantic relation, names must acquire definiteness. Languages differ in whether definiteness is signaled overtly or not: in English, for instance, definite names are not distinguished in form from nondefinite, whereas in Greek definite use of a name is marked by an accompanying article. Other languages vary.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 80 , Issue 3 , September 2004, pp. 435 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aarts, Flor, and Aarts, Jan. 1982. English syntactic structures. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Algeo, John. 1973. On defining the proper name. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Allerton, Derek J. 1987. The linguistic and sociolinguistic status of proper names. Journal of Pragmatics 11.61–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John M. 1971. The grammar of case: Towards a localistic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, John M. 1977. On case grammar: Prolegomena to a theory of grammatical relations. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Anderson, John M. 1997. A notional theory of syntactic categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John M. 2000. Markedness and the ontogenesis of syntax. Folia Linguistica 34.1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John M. 2001. Finiteness, in Greek, and elsewhere. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 37.5–33.Google Scholar
Anderson, John M. 2003. On the structure of names. Folia Linguistica 37.347–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John M. 2004. The argument structure of morphological causatives. Methoni Messinias, Greece, ms. [To appear in oznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics.]Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R., and Keenan, Edward L.. 1985. Deixis. Language typology and syntactic description 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, ed. by Snopen, Timothy, 259–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 2003. Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banfield, Ann. 1973. Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech. Foundations of Language 10.1–39.Google Scholar
Bauer, Winifred. 1993. Maori. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berent, Gerald P. 1977. Specificity and the reduplication of indefinite direct objects in Macedonian. In Fox, et al., 12–14.Google Scholar
Biggs, Bruce. 1969. Let's learn Maori: A guide to the study of the Maori language. Wellington, NZ: A. H. and A. W. Reed.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Brulard, Inès. 1996. Analyse et application contrastive et comparative de l'article en français et en anglais. Teaching grammar: Perspectives in higher education, ed. by Engel, Dulcie and Myles, Florence, 90–112. London: CILT.Google Scholar
Carlson, G. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Amherst: University of Massachusetts dissertation.Google Scholar
Carroll, John M. 1985. What's in a name? An essay in the psychology of reference. New York: W. H. Freedman.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Studies on semantics in generative grammar. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COD = H. W. and Fowler, F. G.. 1950. The concise Oxford dictionary of current English. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Colman, Fran. 1992. Money talks: Reconstructing Old English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Colman, Fran, and Anderson, John. 2004. On metonymy as word-formation: With special reference to Old English. English Studies, to appear.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Bent. 1985. Two essays on reference without meaning: Suppositio materialis and proper names. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 19.1–129.Google Scholar
Dahl, Osten. 1975. On generics. Formal semantics of natural language, ed. by Keenan, Edward L., 99–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Eirlys. 1986. The English imperative. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
de la Grasserie, Raoul. 1895. De l'article. Mémoires de la société de linguistique de Paris 9.285–322.Google Scholar
Donnellan, Keith. 1966. Reference and descriptions. Philosophical Review 75.281–304. [Reprinted in Steinberg & Jakobovits, 100-114.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, Bruce T. 1969. Vocatives and third-person imperatives. Papers in Linguistics 1.570–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
du Feu, Veronica. 1996. Rapanui. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fox, Samuel E., Beach, Woodford A.; and Philosoph, Shulamith (eds.) 1977. CLS book of squibs. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100.25–50.Google Scholar
Fries, Charles Carpenter. 1952. The structure of English: An introduction to the construction of English sentences. London: Longman, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Gardiner, A. H. 1954. The theory of proper names: A controversial essay. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gary-Prieur, Marie-Noëlle. 1994. Grammaire du nom propre. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Giering, Dieter, Graustein, Gottfried, Hoffmann, Achim, Kirsten, Hans, Neubert, Albrecht; and Thiele, Wolfgang. 1980. English grammar: A university handbook. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1978. Definiteness and referentiality. Universals of human language 4: Syntax, ed. by Greenberg, Joseph, 291–330. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gómez de Silva, Guido. 1994. La lingüística de los nombres propios: Metodología y ejemplos. Il encuentro de lingüistas y filólogos de España y México, ed. by Alonso, Alegría, Garza, Beatriz, and Pascual, José A., 205–20. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad Salamanca.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1968. A language without particulars. Mind 77.168–85.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hannay, Michael. 1985. English existentials in functional grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herschensohn, Julia. 1977. Objective and subjective generic sentences in French. In Fox, et al., 49–52.Google Scholar
Hess, H. Harwood. 1968. The syntactic structure of Mezquital Otomi. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1935/7. La catégorie des cas. Acta Jutlandica 7.i–xii, 1-184; 9.i-vii, 1-78. [Reprinted as @@i@@La catégorie des cas@@/i@@, Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1972.]Google Scholar
Holton, David, Mackridge, Peter; and Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. 1997. Greek: A comprehensive grammar of the modern language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 1984. An introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 2002. Names. London: University College London, ms. Online: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/dick/names.htm.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1933. Essentials of English grammar. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1972. Semantic theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kazazis, Kostas, and Pentheroudakis, Joseph. 1976. Reduplication of indefinite direct objects in Albanian and Modern Greek. Language 56.398–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, Georges. 1981. Problèmes de référence: Descriptions définies et noms propres. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Klein, Flora. 1976. ‘Same vs. different’ cross-linguistically: The ‘articles’ in English and in Spanish. Chicago Linguistic Society 12.413–24.Google Scholar
Korponay, Béla. 1986. Outlines of a Hungarian-English case grammar. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Krämsky, Jiří. 1972. The article and the concept of definiteness in language. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1972. Naming and necessity. Semantics of natural language, ed. by Davidson, Donald and Harman, Gilbert, 253–355. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1977. Speaker's reference and semantic reference. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11.255–77.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Krupa, Viktor. 1982. The Polynesian languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, Jerzy. 1966. La position linguistique du nom proper. Readings in Linguistics 2, ed. by Hamp, Eric, Householder, Fred W., and Austerlitz, Robert, 362–70. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Reprinted from @@i@@Esquisses linguistique@@/i@@, 182-92, Wroclaw-Krakow: Wydnawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.]Google Scholar
Lafitte, Pierre. 1962. Grammaire basque. Bayonne: Éditions des ‘Amis du musée basque’ et ‘Ikas’.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1973. Review of @@i@@The origin of English surnames@@/i@@, by P. H. Reaney. Foundations of Language 9.392–402.Google Scholar
Latham, Robert Gordon. 1862. The English language. London: Walton and Maberly.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. H. 1965. Hidatsa syntax. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, W. K. 1949. The Polynesian articles. Lingua 2.14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1843. A system of logic. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1984. Principles of naming in Mohawk. Naming systems (1980 Proceedings of the American Ethnological Society), ed. by Tooker, Elisabeth, 40–54. Washington, DC: American Ethnological Society.Google Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, Anna. 2000. Greek personal names and linguistic continuity. Greek personal names: Their value as evidence, ed. by Hornblower, Simon and Matthews, Elaine, 15–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Lindley. 1829. Abridgment of Murray's English grammar. London: Harvey and Darton.Google Scholar
Nosek, J. 1986. Apposition in Modern English. English in function 4, ed. by Rot, Sándor, 84–103. Budapest: Az Eötvös Lorând Tudományegyetern.Google Scholar
Nuessel, Frank. 1992. The study of names: A guide to the principles and topics. Westport, CO: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
@@i@@OED =@@/i@@ Murray, J. A. H., Bradley, H., Craigie, W. A.; and Onions, C. T.. 1888-1933. The Oxford English dictionary. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Port Royal grammar = A general and rational grammar. London: J. Nourse. Translated from @@i@@Grammaire générale et raisonnée@@/i@@, Paris, 1660. [Reprinted Menston, UK: Scolar Press, 1968.]Google Scholar
Posner, Rebecca. 1996. The Romance languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst. 1954. Theory of names. Berkeley, CA: American Name Society.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, and Greenbaum, Sidney. 1973. A university grammar of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 1993. Aspects of the development of the noun phrase in English. English diachronic syntax, ed. by Gotti, Maurizio, 35–54. Milano: Guerini.Google Scholar
Roberts, Paul. 1962. English sentences. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Robinson, Fred C. 1993. The tomb of Beowulf and other essays on Old English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1918. The philosophy of logical atomism. [Reprinted, ed. by David Pears, La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1985.]Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seppänen, Aimo. 1974. Proper names in English: A study in semantics and syntax. Tampere, Finland: Publications of the Department of English Philology, University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Sloat, Clarence. 1969. Proper nouns in English. Language 45.26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, Holger Steen. 1958. Word classes in Modern English, with special reference to proper names, with an introductory theory of grammar, meaning and reference. Copenhagen: G. E. C. Gad.Google Scholar
Sørensen, Holger Steen. 1963. The meaning of proper names, with a deflniens formula for proper names in English. Copenhagen: G. E. C. Gad.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Danny D., and Jakobovits, Leon A. (eds.) 1971. Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strang, Barbara M. H. 1962. Modern English structure. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1891. A new English grammar 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thorne, J. P. 1966. English imperative sentences. Journal of Linguistics 2.69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. [Ch. 2 reprinted in Steinberg & Jakobovits, 115-33.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, John. 1668. An essay towards a real character and a philosophical language. London: Gellibrand. [Reprinted, Menston, UK: Scolar Press, 1968.]Google Scholar
Zandvoort, Reinard Willem. 1964. A handbook of English grammar. Groningen: J. B. Wolters.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1974. Hey, whatsyourname! Chicago Linguistic Society 10.787–801.Google Scholar