Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T08:37:22.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Rules of Norwegian Tonality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2026

Einar Haugen
Einar Haugen*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new analysis of the Norwegian (and Swedish) word tones is presented, according to which Accent I is regarded as the unmarked member and is identified with primary stress, while Accent II is regarded as the only distinctive tone. The problem of functional burden is explored, and it is suggested that the relatively low importance of tone in communication is due to its structural dependence on the placement of stress. Rules are proposed for the distribution of tone, bringing out the invalidity of most of the minimal pairs presented in previous studies. It is shown that tone is a feature of the post-tonic syllable, and that its presence in the native and much of the borrowed vocabulary is determined by the morphology; in other vocabulary items, the occurrence of tone is highly arbitrary, being lexically and dialectically determined, with virtually no minimal pairs possible.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , March 1967, pp. 185 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © 1967 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aasen, Ivar. 1864. Norsk grammatik. Christiania.Google Scholar
Alnæs, Ivar. 1925. Norsk uttale-ordbok. Oslo, Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Bødtker, A. Trampe. 1941. Gjennom metrum og rytme. Maal og Minne, 49–66.Google Scholar
Borgstrøm, Carl Hj. 1962. Tonemes and phrase intonation in south-eastern standard Norwegian. Studia Linguistica 16. 34–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broch, Olaf. 1923. Fra Østlandets dagligtale. Maal og Minne, 124–55.Google Scholar
Broch, Olaf. 1944. Tonelag bestemmende for lydutvikling. Maal og Minne, 145–61.Google Scholar
Christiansen, Hallfrid. 1943. Tonelagene i komposita på blå- og grå-. Maal og Minne, 175–80.Google Scholar
Efremova, I. B., Fintoft, K., and Ormestad, H. 1963. Intelligibility of tonic accents. Phonetica 10. 203–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efremova, I. B., Fintoft, K., and Ormestad, H. 1965. An experimental study of tonic accents in East Norwegian. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 20. 5–17.Google Scholar
Elert, Claes. 1964. Phonological studies of quantity in Swedish. (Monografier utgivna av Stockholms Kommunalförvaltning, 27.) Uppsala.Google Scholar
Elert, Claes. 1966. Review of Bengt Sigurd, Phonotactic structures in Swedish. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 9.19.Google Scholar
Fintoft, K. 1965. Some remarks on word accents. Phonetica 13. 201–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fliflet, Albert Lange. 1963. Syllable type and syllable perception. Phonetica 10. 187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadding-Koch, Kerstin. 1961. Acoustico-phonetic studies in the intonation of southern Swedish. (Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique de Lund, 3.) Lund, Gleerup.Google Scholar
Hadding-Koch, Kerstin. 1962. Notes on the Swedish word tones. Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Helsinki 1961), ed. by Sovijārvi, A., 630–8. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Hadding-Koch, Kerstin, and Abramson, Arthur. 1964. Duration versus spectrum in Swedish vowels: some perceptual experiments. Studia Linguistica 18. 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammarström, Göran. 1963. Prosodeme und Kontureme. Phonetica 10. 194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamp, Eric P. 1959. Final syllables in Germanic and the Scandinavian accent system. Studia Linguistica 13. 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1963. Pitch accent and tonemic juncture in Scandinavian. Monatshefte für Deutschen Unterricht 55. 157–61.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1965. Norwegian-English dictionary. Oslo, Universitetsforlaget; Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1967. The prosodic system of Norwegian. Scandinavian Studies 39. 47–51.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar, and Joos, Martin. 1952. Tone and intonation in East Norwegian. Acta Philologica Scandinavica 22. 41–64.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, and Sommerfelt, Alf. 1962. On the role of pitch in Norwegian verse. Lingua 11. 205–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay H. 1966. Remarks on the Scandinavian word tones. Lingua 16. 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Martin Kloster. 1958. Bokmålets tonelagspar (‘Vippere‘). (Universitetet i Bergen, Årbok 1958.) Bergen, Grieg.Google Scholar
Jensen, Martin Kloster. 1959. Tonelagsdistribusjon. Maal og Minne, 80–6.Google Scholar
Jensen, Martin Kloster. 1961. Tonemicity. (Universitetet i Bergen, Årbok 1961.) Bergen and Oslo, Norwegian Universities Press.Google Scholar
Knudsen, Knud. 1856. Haandbog i dansk-norsk sproglære. Kristiania.Google Scholar
Larsen, Amund B. 1949-50. Tanker og meninger. Maal og Minne, 9–18.Google Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil. 1953. Sydsvensk ordaccent, en experimentalfonetisk undersökning. (Lunds Universitets Årsskrift, N. F., Avd. 1, Bd. 49, Nr. 2.) Lund, Gleerup.Google Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil. 1962. Analyse instrumentale et structurale des faits d'accents. Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Helsinki 1961), ed. by Sovijärvi, A., 456–75. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil. 1966. Analyse des faits prosodiques: problèmes et méthodes. Cahiers de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée 3. 99–107.Google Scholar
Monrad-Krohn, G. H. 1947. Dysprosody or altered ‘melody of language’. Brain 70. 405–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popperwell, R. G. 1963. The pronunciation of Norwegian. Cambridge, University Press; Oslo, University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Reitan, Jørgen. 1935. Om bruken av patronymica i de nordenfjellske mål. Maal og Minne, 26–49.Google Scholar
Rischel, Jørgen. 1960. Über die phonematische und morphophonematische Funktion der sogenannten Worttöne im Norwegischen. Zeitschrift für Phonetik und Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 13. 179–85.Google Scholar
Rischel, Jørgen. 1963. Morphemic tone and word tone in Eastern Norwegian. Phonetica 10. 154–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rischel, Jørgen. 1964. Stress, juncture and syllabification in phonemic description. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, ed. by Lunt, Horace, 85–93. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Schelderup-Ebbe, Thorleif. 1933. Iagttagelser om enkelt og dobbelt tonelag. Maal og Minne, 49–53.Google Scholar
Skadsem, Marius. 1948. Om tonelaget i stadnamn. Maal og Minne 1948. 42–49.Google Scholar
Vanvik, Arne. 1956. Norske tonelag. Maal og Minne, 92–102.Google Scholar
Vanvik, Arne. 1961. Three tonemes in Norwegian? Studia Linguistica 15. 22–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanvik, Arne. 1963. Some problems in Scandinavian tonemics. Phonetica 10. 165–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Western, August. 1937. Om tonelagene i norsk. Maal og Minne, 174–82.Google Scholar
Vanvik, Arne. 1938. Mere om tonelagene i norsk. Maal og Minne, 73–4.Google Scholar