Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T05:38:44.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ordering Distribution of Main and Adverbial Clauses: A Typological Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Holger Diessel
Holger Diessel*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
*
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Inselstr. 22, 04103 Leipzig, Germany [diessel@eva.mpg.de]
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the ordering distribution of main and adverbial clauses in crosslinguistic perspective. Using a representative sample of forty languages, the author shows that the ordering of main and adverbial clauses correlates with the position of the subordinator in the subordinate clause. In languages in which adverbial clauses have a final subordinator, adverbial clauses tend to precede the main clause, whereas in languages in which adverbial clauses are marked by an initial subordinator, adverbial clauses commonly occur in both sentence-initial and sentence-final position. In the latter language type, the position of an adverbial clause varies with its meaning or function: conditional clauses precede the main clause more often than temporal clauses, which in turn are more often preposed than causal, result, and purpose clauses. The distributional patterns are explained in terms of competing motivations; it is suggested that they arise from the interaction between structural and discourse-pragmatic factors.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , September 2001, pp. 433 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Asher, R. E., and Kumari, T. C. 1997. Malayalam. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Tej K. 1993. Punjabi: A cognitive-descriptive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bielec, Dana. 1998. Polish: An essential grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Borgman, Donald M. 1990. Sanuma. Handbook of Amazonian languages, ed. by Derbyshire, Desmond C. and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (3 vols., 1986–1990), 2. 15-248. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Buechel, Eugene S. J. 1939. A grammar of Lakota. The language of the Teton Sioux Indians. Saint Francis P.O., South Dakota: Saint Francis Mission.Google Scholar
Calvez, Daniel J. 1993. French reference grammar. Lincolnwood: NTC Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Carlson, Robert. 1994. A grammar of Supyire. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Suk-Jin. 1989. Korean: Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chelliah, Shobhana L. 1997. A grammar of Meithei. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayley, Jon P. 1985. Tzutujil grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dayley, Jon P. 1989. Tümpisa (Panamint) Shoshone grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Denwood, Philip. 1999. Tibetan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit Jan. 1983. The Turkana language. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W., and Blake, Barry (eds.) 1979-1991. Handbook of Australian languages, vols. 1-4. Canberra and Amsterdam: Australian National University Press and John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Karen H. 1979. Sprache und Tradition der Kera (Tschad). Teil 3: Grammatik. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel, and Kern, Barbara. 1997. Wari': The Pacaas Novos language of western Brazil. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fähnrich, Heinz. 1987. Kurze Grammatik der georgischen Sprache. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädia.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael. 1984. West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Glinert, Lewis. 1989. The grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hercus, Luise A. 1989. A grammar of the Arabana-Wangkangurru language, Lake Eyre Basin, south Australia. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Brian George. 1995. Georgian: A structural reference grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, Robert A. 1990. A syntactic sketch of Ayutla Mixtec. Studies in the syntax of Mixtecan languages, vol. 2, ed. by Bradley, C. Henry and Hollenbach, Barbara E., 1–260. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Holes, Clive. 1995. Modern Arabic: Structures, functions and varieties. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Huttar, George L., and Huttar, Mary L. 1994. Ndyuka. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ikoro, Suanu M. 1996. The Kana language. Leiden: Research School CNWS.Google Scholar
Jones, Wendell, and Jones, Paula. 1991. Barasano syntax. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas Publications in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kakumasu, James. 1986. Urubu-Kaapor. In Derbyshire and Pullum (eds.), vol. I, 326–403.Google Scholar
Kenesei, István, Vago, Robert M.; and Fenyvesi, Anna. 1998. Hungarian. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo. 1978. Japanese: A characteristic OV language. In Lehmann (ed.), 57-138.Google Scholar
Leger, Rudolf. 1994. Eine Grammatik der Kwami-Sprache (Nordostnigeria). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Mahootian, Shahrzad. 1997. Persian. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reesink, Ger P. 1987. Structures and their function in Usan: A Papuan language of Papua New Guinea. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Keren. 1989. A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1987. Amele. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Rumsey, Alan. 1982. An intra-sentence grammar of Ungarinjin, north-western Australia. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Saeed, John. 1999. Somali. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul, and Otanes, Fe T. 1972. Tagalog reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaub, Willi. 1985. Babungo. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Sneddon, James Neil. 1996. Indonesian: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min. 1994. Korean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, David John. 1989. A grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt. 1984. Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica 38. 20–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanasiadou, Angeliki, and Dirven, René (eds.) 1997. On conditionals again. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter. 1981. Switch-reference in Australia. Language 57. 309–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter (ed.) 1988. Complex sentence constructions in Australian languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 1998. Review of Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, ed. by Haspelmath, Martin and König, Ekkehard. Linguistic Typology 2. 381–97.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1984. How people use adverbial clauses. Berkeley Linguistics Society 10. 437–49.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 1998a. Subordination strategies: A typological study. Pavia: University of Pavia dissertation.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 1998b. Deranking and balancing in different subordinate relations: A typological study. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 51. 3–42.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1994. A gestalt analysis of complex sentences and its typological consequences, Manchester: University of Manchester, ##MS.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and prediction: Time, knowledge, and causation in conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1996. Processing factors of pre- and postposed adverbial clauses. Berkeley Linguistics Society 23. 71–82.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1980. Studies in functional grammar. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1980. The languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Downing, Pamela, and Noonan, Michael (eds.) 1995. Word order in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1980. The positional tendencies of sentential noun phrases in universal grammar. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 25. 123–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1989. Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language 13. 257–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1991. SVO languages and the OV:VO typology. Linguistics 27. 443–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992a. Adverbial subordinators and word order asymmetries. Performance principles of word order (Eurotype Working Papers), ed. by Hawkins, John A. and Siewierska, Anna, 1–33. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation Programme in Language Typology, ESF Office Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992b. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68. 81–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. 1986. The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1991. The Yimas language of New Guinea. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William A., and Van Valin, Robert D. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. 1993. Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., and Thompson, Sandra A. 1986. Conditionals in discourse: A text-based study from English. In Traugott et al., 353–72.Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn. 1979. Parsing and constraints on word order. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5. 177–98.Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn. 1985. Syntactic complexity. Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives, ed. by Dowty, David R., Karttunen, Lauri, and Zwicky, Arnold M., 129–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1980. The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language 4. 333–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1984/1990. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, vols. 1-2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy (ed.) 1985. Quantified studies in discourse. Special issue of Text 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1991. The evolution of dependent clause morpho-syntax in Biblical Hebrew. Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 2, ed. by Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd, 257–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Universals of language, ed. by Greenberg, Joseph H., 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grimes, Barbara F. (ed.) 1996. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 13th edn. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Grosu, Alexander, and Thompson, Sandra A. 1977. Constraints on the distribution of NP clauses. Language 53. 104–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John. 1978. Conditionals are topics. Language 54. 564–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John, and Thompson, Sandra A. 1984. ‘Subordination’ in universal grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 10. 510–23.Google Scholar
Haiman, John, and Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.) 1988. Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1976. The adjoined relative clause in Australia. Grammatical categories in Australian languages, ed. by Dixon, R. M. W., 78–105. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1989. From purposive to infinitive—A universal path of grammaticalization. Folia Linguistica Historica 10. 287–310.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective. Structure and meaning of adverbial verb forms—Adverbial participles, gerunds, ed. by Haspelmath, Martin and König, Ekkehard, 1–56. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1980. On implicational and distributional universals of word order. Journal of Linguistics 16. 193–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1988. On explaining some left-right asymmetries in syntactic and morphological universals. Studies in syntactic typology, ed. by Hammond, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith A., and Wirth, Jessica R., 321–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1990. A parsing theory of word order universals. Linguistic Inquiry 21. 223–61.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1992. Syntactic weight versus information structure in word order variation. Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, ed. by Jacobs, Joachim, 196–219. Linguistische Berichte special issue 4.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1998. Some issues in a performance theory of word order. Constituent order in the languages of Europe, ed. by Siewierska, Anna, 729–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1998. Adverbial clauses in the languages of Europe. In van der Auwera (ed.), 335–419.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Brian George. 1987. The typology of subordination in Georgian and Abkhaz. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Richard A. 1976. Conjunction reduction, gapping, and right-node raising. Language 52. 535–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 1998. Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1978. The syntax of subject-final languages. In Lehmann (ed.). 267–327.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1985. Relative clauses. In Shopen, vol. 2, 141–70.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1997. Adverbial subordination: A typology of adverbial subordinators based on European languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1998. Adverbial subordinators in the languages of Europe. In van der Auwera, 457–561.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo. 1973. Constraints on internal clauses and sentential subjects. Linguistic Inquiry 4. 363–85.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo. 1974. The position of relative clauses and conjunctions. Linguistic Inquiry 5. 117–36.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1984. Der Relativsatz. Typologie seiner Strukturen. Theorie seiner Funktionen. Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1988. Towards a typology of clause linkage. In Haiman & Thompson. 181–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1973. A structural principle of language and its implications. Language 49. 42–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1978. The great underlying ground-plans. In Lehmann (ed.), 3–55.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. (ed.) 1978. Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert E. 1985. Sentences as combinations of clauses. In Shopen, vol. 2. 235–86.Google Scholar
Marchese, Lynell. 1987. On the role of conditionals in Godie procedural discourse. In Tomlin, 263–80.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian, and Thompson, Sandra A. 1988. The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In Haiman and Thompson, 275–329.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. In Shopen, vol. 2, 42–140.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris L. (ed.) 1992. Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey; and Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ramsay, Violetta. 1987. The functional distribution of preposed and postposed ‘if’ and ‘when’ clauses in written discourse. In Tomlin, 383–408.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1984. Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics 22. 779–809.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1988. Amele switch-reference and the theory of grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 45–63.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1986 (1967). Infinite syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex (1967. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation).Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1970. Gapping and the order of constituents. Progress in linguistics, ed. by Bierwisch, Manfred and Heidolph, Karl Erich, 249–59. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Shopen, Timothy (ed.) 1985. Language typology and syntactic description, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 1985. Comparison and universal grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1996. Mental spaces and the grammar of conditional constructions. Spaces, worlds and grammars, ed. by Fauconnier, Gilles and Sweetser, Eve, 318–33. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1978. Figure and ground in complex sentences. Universals of human language, vol. 4, ed. by Greenberg, Joseph H., Ferguson, Charles A., and Moravcsik, Edith A., 625–52. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1985. Grammar and written discourse. Initial and final purpose clauses in English. In Givón, , 55–84.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1987. ‘Subordination’ and narrative event structure. In Tomlin, , 435–54.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Longacre, Robert E. 1985. Adverbial clauses. In Shopen, vol. 2 171–34.Google Scholar
Tomlin, Russell 1985. Foreground-background information and the syntax of subordination. In Givón, 85–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Russell (ed.) Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, Meulen, Alice Ter, Reilly, Judy Snitzer; and Ferguson, Charles A. (eds.) 1986. On conditionals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan (ed.) 1998. Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oirsouw, Robert. 1987. The syntax of coordination. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Van Valin Robert, D., and LaPolla, Randy J. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1973. Explanation in syntax. Syntax and semantics 2, ed. by Kimball, John, 1–50. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1974. Theoretical word order studies. Results and problems. Papiere zur Linguistik 7. 5–25.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1976. Categorial grammar and the order of meaningful elements. Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, ed. by Juilland, Alphonse, 615–34. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo, and Harlow, Ray. 1977. Categorial grammar and consistent basic VX serialization. Theoretical Linguistics 4. 227–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, R. E., and Kumari, T. C. 1997. Malayalam. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Tej K. 1993. Punjabi: A cognitive-descriptive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bielec, Dana. 1998. Polish: An essential grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Borgman, Donald M. 1990. Sanuma. Handbook of Amazonian languages, ed. by Derbyshire, Desmond C. and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (3 vols., 1986–1990), 2. 15-248. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Buechel, Eugene S. J. 1939. A grammar of Lakota. The language of the Teton Sioux Indians. Saint Francis P.O., South Dakota: Saint Francis Mission.Google Scholar
Calvez, Daniel J. 1993. French reference grammar. Lincolnwood: NTC Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Carlson, Robert. 1994. A grammar of Supyire. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Suk-Jin. 1989. Korean: Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chelliah, Shobhana L. 1997. A grammar of Meithei. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayley, Jon P. 1985. Tzutujil grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dayley, Jon P. 1989. Tümpisa (Panamint) Shoshone grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Denwood, Philip. 1999. Tibetan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit Jan. 1983. The Turkana language. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W., and Blake, Barry (eds.) 1979-1991. Handbook of Australian languages, vols. 1-4. Canberra and Amsterdam: Australian National University Press and John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Karen H. 1979. Sprache und Tradition der Kera (Tschad). Teil 3: Grammatik. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel, and Kern, Barbara. 1997. Wari': The Pacaas Novos language of western Brazil. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fähnrich, Heinz. 1987. Kurze Grammatik der georgischen Sprache. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädia.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael. 1984. West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Glinert, Lewis. 1989. The grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hercus, Luise A. 1989. A grammar of the Arabana-Wangkangurru language, Lake Eyre Basin, south Australia. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Brian George. 1995. Georgian: A structural reference grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, Robert A. 1990. A syntactic sketch of Ayutla Mixtec. Studies in the syntax of Mixtecan languages, vol. 2, ed. by Bradley, C. Henry and Hollenbach, Barbara E., 1–260. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Holes, Clive. 1995. Modern Arabic: Structures, functions and varieties. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Huttar, George L., and Huttar, Mary L. 1994. Ndyuka. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ikoro, Suanu M. 1996. The Kana language. Leiden: Research School CNWS.Google Scholar
Jones, Wendell, and Jones, Paula. 1991. Barasano syntax. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas Publications in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kakumasu, James. 1986. Urubu-Kaapor. In Derbyshire and Pullum (eds.), vol. I, 326–403.Google Scholar
Kenesei, István, Vago, Robert M.; and Fenyvesi, Anna. 1998. Hungarian. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo. 1978. Japanese: A characteristic OV language. In Lehmann (ed.), 57-138.Google Scholar
Leger, Rudolf. 1994. Eine Grammatik der Kwami-Sprache (Nordostnigeria). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Mahootian, Shahrzad. 1997. Persian. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reesink, Ger P. 1987. Structures and their function in Usan: A Papuan language of Papua New Guinea. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Keren. 1989. A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1987. Amele. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Rumsey, Alan. 1982. An intra-sentence grammar of Ungarinjin, north-western Australia. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Saeed, John. 1999. Somali. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul, and Otanes, Fe T. 1972. Tagalog reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaub, Willi. 1985. Babungo. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Sneddon, James Neil. 1996. Indonesian: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min. 1994. Korean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, David John. 1989. A grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt. 1984. Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica 38. 20–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanasiadou, Angeliki, and Dirven, René (eds.) 1997. On conditionals again. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter. 1981. Switch-reference in Australia. Language 57. 309–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter (ed.) 1988. Complex sentence constructions in Australian languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 1998. Review of Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, ed. by Haspelmath, Martin and König, Ekkehard. Linguistic Typology 2. 381–97.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1984. How people use adverbial clauses. Berkeley Linguistics Society 10. 437–49.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 1998a. Subordination strategies: A typological study. Pavia: University of Pavia dissertation.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 1998b. Deranking and balancing in different subordinate relations: A typological study. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 51. 3–42.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1994. A gestalt analysis of complex sentences and its typological consequences, Manchester: University of Manchester, ##MS.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and prediction: Time, knowledge, and causation in conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1996. Processing factors of pre- and postposed adverbial clauses. Berkeley Linguistics Society 23. 71–82.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1980. Studies in functional grammar. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1980. The languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Downing, Pamela, and Noonan, Michael (eds.) 1995. Word order in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1980. The positional tendencies of sentential noun phrases in universal grammar. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 25. 123–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1989. Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language 13. 257–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1991. SVO languages and the OV:VO typology. Linguistics 27. 443–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992a. Adverbial subordinators and word order asymmetries. Performance principles of word order (Eurotype Working Papers), ed. by Hawkins, John A. and Siewierska, Anna, 1–33. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation Programme in Language Typology, ESF Office Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992b. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68. 81–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. 1986. The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1991. The Yimas language of New Guinea. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William A., and Van Valin, Robert D. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. 1993. Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., and Thompson, Sandra A. 1986. Conditionals in discourse: A text-based study from English. In Traugott et al., 353–72.Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn. 1979. Parsing and constraints on word order. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5. 177–98.Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn. 1985. Syntactic complexity. Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives, ed. by Dowty, David R., Karttunen, Lauri, and Zwicky, Arnold M., 129–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1980. The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language 4. 333–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1984/1990. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, vols. 1-2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy (ed.) 1985. Quantified studies in discourse. Special issue of Text 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1991. The evolution of dependent clause morpho-syntax in Biblical Hebrew. Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 2, ed. by Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd, 257–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Universals of language, ed. by Greenberg, Joseph H., 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grimes, Barbara F. (ed.) 1996. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 13th edn. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Grosu, Alexander, and Thompson, Sandra A. 1977. Constraints on the distribution of NP clauses. Language 53. 104–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John. 1978. Conditionals are topics. Language 54. 564–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John, and Thompson, Sandra A. 1984. ‘Subordination’ in universal grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 10. 510–23.Google Scholar
Haiman, John, and Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.) 1988. Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1976. The adjoined relative clause in Australia. Grammatical categories in Australian languages, ed. by Dixon, R. M. W., 78–105. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1989. From purposive to infinitive—A universal path of grammaticalization. Folia Linguistica Historica 10. 287–310.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective. Structure and meaning of adverbial verb forms—Adverbial participles, gerunds, ed. by Haspelmath, Martin and König, Ekkehard, 1–56. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1980. On implicational and distributional universals of word order. Journal of Linguistics 16. 193–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1988. On explaining some left-right asymmetries in syntactic and morphological universals. Studies in syntactic typology, ed. by Hammond, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith A., and Wirth, Jessica R., 321–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1990. A parsing theory of word order universals. Linguistic Inquiry 21. 223–61.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1992. Syntactic weight versus information structure in word order variation. Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, ed. by Jacobs, Joachim, 196–219. Linguistische Berichte special issue 4.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1998. Some issues in a performance theory of word order. Constituent order in the languages of Europe, ed. by Siewierska, Anna, 729–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1998. Adverbial clauses in the languages of Europe. In van der Auwera (ed.), 335–419.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Brian George. 1987. The typology of subordination in Georgian and Abkhaz. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Richard A. 1976. Conjunction reduction, gapping, and right-node raising. Language 52. 535–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 1998. Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1978. The syntax of subject-final languages. In Lehmann (ed.). 267–327.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1985. Relative clauses. In Shopen, vol. 2, 141–70.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1997. Adverbial subordination: A typology of adverbial subordinators based on European languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1998. Adverbial subordinators in the languages of Europe. In van der Auwera, 457–561.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo. 1973. Constraints on internal clauses and sentential subjects. Linguistic Inquiry 4. 363–85.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo. 1974. The position of relative clauses and conjunctions. Linguistic Inquiry 5. 117–36.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1984. Der Relativsatz. Typologie seiner Strukturen. Theorie seiner Funktionen. Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1988. Towards a typology of clause linkage. In Haiman & Thompson. 181–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1973. A structural principle of language and its implications. Language 49. 42–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1978. The great underlying ground-plans. In Lehmann (ed.), 3–55.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. (ed.) 1978. Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert E. 1985. Sentences as combinations of clauses. In Shopen, vol. 2. 235–86.Google Scholar
Marchese, Lynell. 1987. On the role of conditionals in Godie procedural discourse. In Tomlin, 263–80.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian, and Thompson, Sandra A. 1988. The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In Haiman and Thompson, 275–329.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. In Shopen, vol. 2, 42–140.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris L. (ed.) 1992. Pragmatics of word order flexibility. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey; and Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ramsay, Violetta. 1987. The functional distribution of preposed and postposed ‘if’ and ‘when’ clauses in written discourse. In Tomlin, 383–408.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1984. Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics 22. 779–809.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1988. Amele switch-reference and the theory of grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 45–63.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1986 (1967). Infinite syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex (1967. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation).Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1970. Gapping and the order of constituents. Progress in linguistics, ed. by Bierwisch, Manfred and Heidolph, Karl Erich, 249–59. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Shopen, Timothy (ed.) 1985. Language typology and syntactic description, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 1985. Comparison and universal grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1996. Mental spaces and the grammar of conditional constructions. Spaces, worlds and grammars, ed. by Fauconnier, Gilles and Sweetser, Eve, 318–33. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1978. Figure and ground in complex sentences. Universals of human language, vol. 4, ed. by Greenberg, Joseph H., Ferguson, Charles A., and Moravcsik, Edith A., 625–52. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1985. Grammar and written discourse. Initial and final purpose clauses in English. In Givón, , 55–84.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1987. ‘Subordination’ and narrative event structure. In Tomlin, , 435–54.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Longacre, Robert E. 1985. Adverbial clauses. In Shopen, vol. 2 171–34.Google Scholar
Tomlin, Russell 1985. Foreground-background information and the syntax of subordination. In Givón, 85–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Russell (ed.) Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, Meulen, Alice Ter, Reilly, Judy Snitzer; and Ferguson, Charles A. (eds.) 1986. On conditionals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan (ed.) 1998. Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oirsouw, Robert. 1987. The syntax of coordination. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Van Valin Robert, D., and LaPolla, Randy J. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1973. Explanation in syntax. Syntax and semantics 2, ed. by Kimball, John, 1–50. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1974. Theoretical word order studies. Results and problems. Papiere zur Linguistik 7. 5–25.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1976. Categorial grammar and the order of meaningful elements. Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, ed. by Juilland, Alphonse, 615–34. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo, and Harlow, Ray. 1977. Categorial grammar and consistent basic VX serialization. Theoretical Linguistics 4. 227–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar