Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T01:57:24.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pragmatics and presupposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Jerrold J. Katz  and
D. Terence Langendoen
Jerrold J. Katz
Affiliation:
Graduate Center, City University of New York
D. Terence Langendoen
Affiliation:
Graduate Center, City University of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the claim that the only adequate account of presupposition in natural language must be a contextual one, and that a purely semantic account of this notion is inadequate. We contend that exactly the opposite is the case: there is an adequate semantic account of presupposition in natural language, so that contextual accounts of this notion are unnecessary.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , March 1976 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Austin, J. L. 1963. Performative-constative. Philosophy and ordinary language, ed. by Caton, C. E., 22–54. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G., Katz, J. J.; and Langendoen, D. T. (eds.) MS. An integrated theory of linguistic ability. To appear, New York: T. Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., and Halle, M. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., and Langendoen, D. T. (eds.) 1971. Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik 100.25–50. [In Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege, ed. by P. T. Geach & M. Black, 68–74. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1952.]Google Scholar
Green, G. 1968. On too and either, and not just on too and either, either. Papers from the 4th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 22–39.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: speech acts, ed. by Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L., 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harnish, M. MS. Logical form and implicature. To appear in Bever, Katz & Langendoen.Google Scholar
Horn, L. 1972. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. UCLA dissertation.Google Scholar
Karttunen, L. 1973. Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 4. 169–193.Google Scholar
Karttunen, L. 1974. Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1.181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, L. MS. Remarks on presupposition. To appear in Proceedings of the Texas Conference on Performatives, Presuppositions, and Conversational Implicatures, ed. by Murphy, J., Rogers, A., and Wall, R..Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. 1965. The relevance of linguistics to philosophy. Journal of Philosophy 62.590–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. J. 1966. The philosophy of language. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. 1972. Semantic theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. 1973. Interpretive semantics meets the zombies. Foundations of Language 9.549–596.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. MS. Propositional structure: a study of the contribution of sentence meaning to speech acts. To appear, New York: T. Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J., and Bever, T. G. MS. The fall and rise of empiricism. To appear in Bever, Katz, & Langendoen.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J., and Fodor, J. A. 1963. The structure of a semantic theory. Lg. 39.170–210.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P., and Kiparsky, C. 1970. Fact. Progress in linguistics, ed. by Bierwisch, M. & Heidolph, K. E., 143–173. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1971a. Presupposition and relative grammaticality. Semantics: an interdisciplinary reader, ed. by Steinberg, D. & Jakobovits, L., 329–340. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1971b. The role of deduction in grammar. In Fillmore & Langendoen, 62–70.Google Scholar
Langendoen, D. T., and Savin, H. B. 1971. The projection problem for presuppositions. In Fillmore & Langendoen, 54–60.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. L. 1969. On the treatment of presuppositions in transformational grammar. Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 169–177.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. L. 1973. Presupposition and the representation of meaning. University of Chicago dissertation.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech acts. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. Semantics and philosophy, ed. by Munitz, M. K. and Unger, P. K., 197–214. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar