Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T10:50:38.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Primary Features and Their Enhancement in Consonants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Kenneth N. Stevens and
Samuel Jay Keyser
Kenneth N. Stevens*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Samuel Jay Keyser*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
*
Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Department of Linguistics & Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Among the distinctive features for consonants, we distinguish a set of primary features that are perceptually the most salient. The strength with which a primary feature is manifested in a given sound is influenced by the secondary features that co-occur with it. The features [sonorant], [continuant] and [coronal] are designated as primary, and this designation applies in all of the eight possible configurations in which they occur. The features [anterior] and [lateral] are also designated as primary, but only under restricted conditions. We examine systematically which combinations of secondary features provide maximal enhancement of the acoustic manifestations of the primary features. This analysis leads to an inventory of eleven preferred feature combinations or segments. There is a close fit between this preferred inventory and a list of the most frequently occurring segments in the languages of the world, based on Maddieson 1984. This match constitutes support for the view that the frequently occurring feature combinations in the languages of the world come about because those combinations maximize perceptual distinctiveness through the mechanism of feature enhancement. It is suggested that these concepts of enhancement and of preferred feature combinations are directly relevant to the notion of markedness.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , March 1989, pp. 81 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Catford, Ian. 1977. Fundamental problems in phonetics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Chistovich, Ludmilla A., and Lublinskaya, Valentina V. 1979. The ‘center of gravity’ effect in vowel spectra and critical distance between the formants: Psycho-acoustical study of the perception of vowel-like stimuli. Hearing Research 1. 185–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam A., and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2. 225–52.10.1017/S0952675700000440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N., and Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1982. CV phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Series, No. 9.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Delgutte, Bertrand, and Kiang, Nelson Y.-S. 1984. Speech coding in the auditory nerve, IV. Sounds with consonant-like dynamic characteristics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 75. 897–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fant, Gunnar. 1973. Speech sounds and features. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Stevens, Kenneth N. 1971. A note on laryngeal features. Research Laboratory of Electronics Quarterly Progress Report No. 101, 198–213. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Fant, Gunnar; and Halle, Morris. 1952. Preliminaries to speech analysis. (Acoustics Laboratory Report No. 13.) Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, and Waugh, Linda R. 1979. The sound shape of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kewley-Port, Diane. 1983. Time-varying features as correlates of place of articulation in stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73. 322–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladefoged, Peter. 1971. Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi, Gewirth, Letitia; and Blumstein, Sheila E. 1984. A reconsideration of acoustic invariance for place of articulation in diffuse stop consonants: Evidence from a cross-language study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76. 391–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liljencrants, Johan, and Lindblom, Björn. 1972. Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Lg. 48. 839–62.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn. 1986. Phonetic universals in vowel systems. Experimental Phonology, ed. by Ohala, John and Jaeger, Jeri, 13–44. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagey, Elizabeth C. 1986. The representation of features and relations in nonlinear phonology. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Smith, R. Lowell. 1979. Adaptation, saturation and physiological masking in single auditory-nerve fibers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65. 166–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1972. The quantal nature of speech. Human communication: A unified view, ed. by David, E. E. Jr., and Denes, P. B., 51–66. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1980. Acoustical correlates of some phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68. 836–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1983. Acoustical properties used for the identification of speech sounds. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 405. 2–17.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1983.tb31613.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1989. On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics, to appear.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N, Keyser, S. Jay; and Kawasaki, Haruko. 1986. Toward a phonetic and phonological theory of redundant features. Invariance and variability in speech processes, ed. by Perkell, Joseph S. and Klatt, Dennis H., 426–49. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Syrdal, Ann K., and Gopal, H. S. 1986. A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79. 1086–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed