Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T14:39:28.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A reaction to Jackendoff's discussion note

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Pieter A. M. Seuren
Pieter A. M. Seuren*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
*
[pieter.seuren@mpi.n1]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Discussion Notes
Information
Language , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 174 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ford, Marilyn, Bresnan, Joan; and Kaplan, Ronald M.. 1982. A competence-based theory of syntactic closure. The mental representation of grammatical relations, ed. by Bresnan, Joan, 727–96. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, Noam; and Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298. 1569–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seuren, Pieter A. M. 2009. Language in cognition (= Language from within, vol. 7). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar