Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T20:11:32.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Referential properties of Spanish noun phrases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

María-Luisa Rivero
María-Luisa Rivero*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses two aspects of definite and indefinite NP's in the grammar of Spanish: SPECIFICITY, which is formally marked by the mood of restrictive relative clauses; and EXISTENTIAL IMPORT, which derives from the linguistic environment by principles connected with presuppositions in general. Specificity and existential import belong to the grammar of Spanish, not to the realm of pragmatics. In Spanish, Donnellan's referential descriptions constitute a sub-set of specific NP's (definite specific NP's in the singular with an existential presupposition determined by the linguistic environment). Attributive descriptions, on the other hand, are singular, definite, nonspecific NP's having an existential presupposition.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , March 1975, pp. 32 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alonso, Amado. 1957. Estilística y gramática del artículo en español. Estudios lingüísticos, temas españoles, 125–160. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Baker, C. L. 1966. Definiteness and indefiniteness in English. U. of Illinois master's thesis.Google Scholar
Bello, Andres, and Cuervo, Rufino J. 1970. Gramática de la lengua castellana. 8th edition, ed. by Alcalá-Zamora, Niceto y Torres, . Buenos Aires: Editorial Sopena Argentina.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1971. On classifying semantic features. Semantics, ed. by Steinberg, Danny D. & Jakobovits, Leon A., 410–435. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dean, Janet. 1968. Non-specific noun phrases in English. (Harvard Computational Laboratory, Report no. NSF-20.) Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Donnellan, Keith. 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75.281–304. [Reprinted in Semantics, ed. by Danny D. Steinberg and L. A. Jakobovits, 100–114. Cambridge: University Press, 1971.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. 1967. On the syntax of pre verbs. Glossa 1.83–125.Google Scholar
Hadlich, Roger L. 1971. A transformational grammar of Spanish. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, K. 1972. Transformations and semantic interpretation. Linguistic Inquiry 3.141–159.Google Scholar
Heringer, James T. 1969. Indefinite noun phrases and referential opacity. Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 89–97.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. 1969. Semantics for propositional attitudes. Philosophical logic, ed. by Davis, J. W. et al., 21–45. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Karttunen, L. 1969. Problems of reference in syntax. U. of Indiana dissertation.Google Scholar
Karttunen, L. 1973. Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 4.169–194.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward 1971. Two kinds of presupposition in natural language. Studies in linguistic semantics, ed. by Fillmore, C. J. & Langendoen, D. T., 45–52. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward, and Ebert, K. H. 1973. A note on marking transparency and opacity. Linguistic Inquiry 4.421–424.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo. 1970. Some properties of nonreferential noun phrases. Studies in general and oriental linguistics, presented to Shirô Hattori on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, ed. by Jakobson, R. & Kawamoto, S., 348–373. Tokyo: TEC Company.Google Scholar
Lenz, Rodolfo. 1935. La oración y sus partes. 3rd ed. Madrid.Google Scholar
Linsky, Leonard. 1967. Referring. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. 1970. Where do noun phrases come from? Readings in English transformational grammar, ed. by Jacobs, R. A. & Rosenbaum, P. S., 166–183. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. 1973. External NP's versus annotated deep structures. Linguistic Inquiry 4.221–240.Google Scholar
Partee, B. H. 1972. Opacity, coreference and pronouns. Semantics of natural language, ed. by Davidson, D. & Harman, G., 415–441. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M. 1970. On the article in English. Progress in linguistics, ed. by Bierwisch, M. & Heidolph, K. E., 233–248. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ramsey, M. M. 1894. A textbook of modern Spanish. 1967 revised edition by Spaulding, Robert K. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Española, Real Academia. 1973. Esbozo de una nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Rivero, M. L. 1971. Mood and presupposition in Spanish. Foundations of Language 7.305–336.Google Scholar
Rivero, M. L. 1974. Definite and indefinite NP's in Spanish. Linguistic studies in Romance languages, ed. by Campbell, J. et al., 189–202. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown U. Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14.479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. 1964. Determiners and relative clauses in a generative grammar of English. Lg. 40.37–52.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C. 1972. Pragmatics. Semantics of natural language, ed. by Davidson, D. & Harman, G., 380–397. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, R. P., et al. 1968. Integration of transformational theories on English syntax. Springfield, Va: National Technical Information Service.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred N., and Russell, Bertrand. 1925. Principia mathematica. 2nd ed. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar