Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:27:11.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reflexive and emphatic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2026

J. A. Moyne
J. A. Moyne*
Affiliation:
IBM Corporation, Cambridge, Mass.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Through a detailed study of the reflexive and emphatic particles in Persian and some comparison with other languages, it is suggested that the reflexive and emphatic, although homonymous in many languages, have quite distinct syntactic and semantic underlying structures. On the basis of this, a proposal for further exploration is presented for the study of the particle self in English, within the scope of generative-transformational theory.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , March 1971 , pp. 141 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hall (Partee), Barbara. 1965. Subject and object in modern English. Doctoral thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Helke, Michael. 1969. A note on reflexive. MIT (mimeographed).Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1969. Some rules of semantic interpretation for English. Doctoral thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Doctoral thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1969. On pronominalization and the chain of command. In Reibel & Schane, 160–86.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B., and Klima, Edward S. 1963. Rules for English pronominalization. Lg. 39. 17–28. (Reprinted in Reibel & Schane, 145–59.).Google Scholar
Mayzel, S. S. 1957. Izafet v tureckom jazyke. Moscow-Leningrad: AN SSSR.Google Scholar
Mo'in, Mohammad. 1962. Ezafa. 2nd ed. Teheran.Google Scholar
Moyne, John Abel. 1970. The structure of verbal constructions in Persian. Doctoral thesis, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1966. On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, Georgetown University, 19. 177–206. (Reprinted in Reibel & Schane, 201–24.).Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. ms. Cross-over phenomena—a study in the grammar of coreference. (IBM, T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York.).Google Scholar
Reibel, David A., and Schane, Sanford A. (eds.) 1969. Modern studies in English. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1967a. On the cyclic nature of English pronominalization. To honor Roman Jakobson, 3. 1669–82. The Hague: Mouton. (Reprinted in Reibel & Schane, 187–200.).Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1967b. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Warshawsky, Florence. 1965. Reflexivization I, II. MIT (mimeographed).Google Scholar
Zamakhshari, Abu'l-Kāsim Mahmūd bin 'Omar. 1879. Al-mufaṣṣal, ed. by Broch, J. P. Oslo: P. T. Mallingii.Google Scholar