Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T15:06:55.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Saramaccan Narrative Pattern

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2026

Joseph E. Grimes  and
Naomi Glock
Joseph E. Grimes
Affiliation:
Summer Institute of Linguistics
Naomi Glock
Affiliation:
Summer Institute of Linguistics
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Assuming a semantic deep structure that relates to a grammatical surface structure provides a basis for the study of discourse forms in Saramaccan. The common travel narrative, for example, shows a surface organization into paragraphs and sentences with systematic omission of information in some places. To account for this organization we assume a deep structure relation among events, event settings, the narrative setting, the identification of participants in the events, collateral information, and background information.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , June 1970 , pp. 408 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barnard, Myra E., and Longacre, Robert E. 1968. Lexicon versus grammar in Diba- bawon procedural narrative discourse. Discourse, paragraph, and sentence structure in selected Philippine languages, vol. 1, ed. by Longacre, Robert E., 193–222. Santa Ana, Calif.: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Volkslectuur, Bureau. 1961. Woordenlijst van het Sranan-tongo: glossary of the Suriname vernacular. Paramaribo: N. Y. Yarekamp.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1967. Language as symbolization. Lg. 43. 57–91.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1968. Idiomaticity as an anomaly in the Chomskyan paradigm. Foundations of Language 4. 109–27.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cromack, Robert E. 1968. Language systems and discourse structure in Cashinawa. Hartford Seminary Foundation doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Echteld, J. J. M. 1962. The English words in Sranan. Groningen: J. B. Wolters.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. Universais in linguistic theory, ed. by Bach, Emmon and Harms, Robert, 1–90. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1970. The grammar of hitting and breaking. Readings in English transformational grammar, ed. by Jacobs, R. and Rosenbaum, Peter. Waltham, Mass: Blaisdell.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. Jr. 1968. Contrastive analysis in discourse structure. Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics (Georgetown University) 19. 39–64.Google Scholar
Glock, Naomi, ms. Role structures in Saramaccan verbs. To appear in Grimes, in press.Google Scholar
Grimes, Joseph E. (ed.) in press. Languages of the Guianas. (SIL publications in linguistics and related fields.) Norman: Summer Institute of Linguistics of the University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A. Jr. 1948. The linguistic structure of Taki-taki. Lg. 24. 92–116.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A. Jr. 1968. Pidgin and creole languages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics 3. 37–81, 199-244, 4. 179-215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herskovits, Melville J. and Frances, S. 1936. Suriname folk-lore. New York: Columbia Press Press.Google Scholar
Huttar, George L., and Mary, . ms. Djuka phonology. To appear in Grimes, in press.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J., and Fodor, Jerry A. 1963. The structure of a semantic theory. Lg. 39. 170–210.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1967. Social and psychological factors controlling behavior (lecture delivered at Cornell University.), and Joshua Waletzky. 1967. Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience. Essays on the verbal and visual arts (Proceedings of the 1966 annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society), ed. by Helm, June, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, Sydney. 1966. Outline of stratificational grammar. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Langendoen, D. Terence. 1969. The study of syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1964. Beyond the sentence. College Composition and Communication 15. 129–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1967. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. 2nd ed. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1966. On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics (Georgetown University) 19. 177–206.Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir. 1958. Morphology of the folktale. (Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics, publication 10.) Baltimore.Google Scholar
Rountree, Catherine, ms. The phonology of stems in Saramaccan. To appear in Grimes, in press.Google Scholar
Schwarcz, Robert M. 1967. Steps toward a model of linguistic performance: a preliminary sketch. Mechanical Translation 10. 39–52.Google Scholar
Smalley, William A. (ed.) 1964. Orthography studies. London: United Bible Societies.Google Scholar
Taber, Charles R. 1966. The structure of Sango narrative. (Hartford Studies in Linguistics, 17.) Hartford: The Hartford Seminary Foundation.Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, Jan. 1957. The verbal system of Sranan. Lingua 6. 374–96.Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, Jan. 1959. An orthography for Saramaccan. Word 15. 436–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voorhoeve, Jan. 1961. Le ton et la grammaire dans le Saramaccan. Word 17. 146–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voorhoeve, Jan. 1962. Sranan syntax. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, Jan. 1964a. Spelling difficulties in Sranan. In Smalley 1964, 60–70.Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, Jan. 1964b. Some problems in writing tone. In Smalley 1964, 127–131.Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, Jan, and Donicie, Antoon. 1963. Bibliographie du négro-anglais du Surinam. (Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde: bibliographical series, 6.) VGravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1966. On the semantic structure of language. Universals of language, 2nd ed., ed. by Greenberg, Joseph H., 142–216. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 1968. Identification of participants in discourse: a study of aspects of form and meaning in Nomatsiguenga. University of Michigan doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar