Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-w5hgh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T01:07:32.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Segmental Rules of English and Cyclic Phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Jerzy Rubach
Jerzy Rubach*
Affiliation:
University of Warsaw
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to incorporate a description of some segmental rules of English into the framework of cyclic phonology which has grown out of the classical SPE type of phonology, on the one hand, and Kiparsky's works, on the other. The discussion is organized around the problems of palatalization in American English. The rules arrived at are divided into cyclic and postcyclic types, and some predictions which follow from the proposed division are discussed. The analysis considers a number of modifications in the statement of rules originally introduced in SPE.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , March 1984, pp. 21 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. (Linguistic Inquiry monographs, 1.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fidelholtz, James, and Browne, E. Wayles. 1971. Oy, oy, oy. Towards tomorrow's linguistics, ed. by Shuy, Roger W. & Bailey, C.-J. N., 159–84. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1977. Tenseness, vowel shift, and the phonology of back vowels in Modern English. LI 8.611–25.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1978. Formal vs. functional considerations in phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1980. A metrical theory of stress rules. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Kean, Mary-Louise. 1974. The strict cycle in phonology. LI 5.179–203.Google Scholar
Kenyon, John S., and Knott, Thomas A. 1953. A pronouncing dictionary of American English. Springfield, MA: Merriam.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. Abstractness, opacity and global rules. Three dimensions of linguistic theory, ed. by Fujimura, Osamu, 57–86. Tokyo: TEC.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1979. Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. LI 10.421–41.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. MS. Lexical morphology and phonology.Google Scholar
Mascaró, Joan. 1976. Catalan phonology and the phonological cycle. MIT dissertation. [Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.]Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1979. Russian morphology and lexical theory. [MIT, unpublished.]Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1968. Aspects of phonological theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 1977. Changes of consonants in English and Polish. (Prace językoznawcze, 87.) Wrocław: Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 1981. Cyclic phonology and palatalization in Polish and English. Warszawa: University of Warsaw Press.Google Scholar