Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T23:02:29.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The semantics and Paradigmatics of word order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Linda R. Waugh
Linda R. Waugh*
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is argued here that both semantic and paradigmatic analyses of word order are needed to understand the phenomenon. Attributive adjective position in French is explored in some detail, with an aim to defining the distinctive feature of meaning associated with pre-position of the adjective. To this end, the nature of modification is discussed, as against that of word order. It is argued that modification concerns the intersection of two different parts of speech, while pre-position involves a presupposition of the lexical meaning of the noun modified.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , March 1976 , pp. 82 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Armstrong, E. C. 1911. The French shifts in adjective position and their English equivalents. Studies in honor of A. Marshall Elliott, vol. 1, 251–274. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Bidois, R. le, and Bidois, Georges le. 1967. Syntaxe du français moderne: ses fondements historiques et psychologiques, 2nd ed., vols. I–II. Paris: Éditions Auguste Picard.Google Scholar
Blinkenberg, Andreas. 1933. L'ordre des mots en français moderne, 2nd ed., II. København: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Boer, Cornelis de. 1923. Essais de syntaxe française moderne, I: la place de l'adjectif attributif. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Boer, Cornelis de. 1933. Introduction à l'étude de la syntaxe du français (principes et applications). Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1952. Linear modification. PMLA 67.1117–1144.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1954. Meaningful word order in Spanish. Boletín de Filología de la Universidad de Chile 9.45–56.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1967. Adjective in English: attribution and predication. Lingua 18.1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borodina, M. A. 1958. O predikativnom upotreblenii prilagatel'nyx v sovremennom francuzskom jazyke. Učenye Zapiski LGU 232.32–41.Google Scholar
Borodina, M. A. 1958. 1959. La valeur predicative de l'adjectif en français moderne (resume de Vildé-Lot). Français Moderne 27.140–142.Google Scholar
Borodina, M. A. 1963. L'adjectif et les rapports entre sémantique et grammaire en français moderne. Français Moderne 31.193–199.Google Scholar
Brunot, Ferdinand. 1926. La pensée et la langue, méthodes, principes et plan d'une théorie nouvelle du langage appliquée au français. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Burston, J. MS. A semantic analysis of personal and demonstrative pronouns in French.Google Scholar
Clédat, Leon. 1901. La place de l'adjectif en français. Revue de Philologie Française 15.241–275.Google Scholar
Coppieters, R. MS. The opposition between il and ce and the place of the adjective in French. (To appear in Mathematical linguistics and automatic translation, Report NSF 30, Harvard.)Google Scholar
Damourette, J., and Pichon, E. 1911–30. Essai de grammaire de langue française: des mots à la pensée (II). Paris: Éditions d'Artrey.Google Scholar
Glatigny, M. 1965. Sur la place de quelques adjectifs monosyllabiques employés comme épithètes. Français dans le Monde 4.37–38.Google Scholar
Glatigny, M. 1967. La place des adjectifs épithètes dans deux oeuvres de Nerval. Français Moderne 35.201–220.Google Scholar
Gougenheim, G. 1966. Système grammatical de la langue française. Paris: Éditions d'Artrey.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universale of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Universals of language, ed. by Greenberg, J., 58–90. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guiraud, Pierre. 1967. La syntaxe du français contemporain, 3rd ed. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Haas, J. 1907. Die Stellung des Adjektifs im Neufranzösischen. Romanische Forschungen 20.538–559.Google Scholar
Imbs, P. 1950. Remarques sur la fonction épithète en français. Mélanges A. Dauzat, 147–166. Paris: Éditions d'Artrey.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1932. Zur Struktur des russischens Verbums. Charisteria Guilelmo Mathesio oblata, 78–84. Prague: Cercle Linguistique de Prague.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1936. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6.240–288.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1939. Signe zéro. Mélanges Bally, 143–152. Genève: Georg.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1948. The phonemic and grammatical aspects of language in their interrelations. Actes du 6e Congrès International des Linguistes, 5–18, 601. Paris.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1957. Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Slavic Dept. (Reprinted in his Selected writings, II, 130–47.)Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1958. Morfologičeskie nabljudenija nad slavjanskim skloneniem. American contributions to the 4th International Congress of Slavists, 127–158. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1959. Boas' view of grammatical meaning. The anthropology of Franz Boas, ed. by Goldschmidt, Walter (American Anthropological Association, memoir 89), pp. 139–145. Menasha, WI.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Concluding statement: linguistics and poetics. Style in language, ed. by Sebeok, T., 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1961. Linguistics and communication theory. Proceedings of the 12th Symposium in Applied Mathematics, 1960: structure of language and its mathematical aspect, ed. by Jakobson, R., 245–252. Providence: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1962. Parts and wholes in language. Parts and wholes, ed. by Lerner, Daniel, 157–162. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1963. Implications of language universals for linguistics. Universals of language, ed. by Greenberg, J., 208–219. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1965. À la recherche de l'essence du langage. Diogène 51.22–38.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971. Retrospect. Selected writings II, 711–724. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1974. Main trends in the science of language. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kalepky, T. 1901. Zur französischen Syntax: Stellung des attributiven Adjektivs. Zeitschrift für Romanischen Philologie 25.322–339.Google Scholar
Kalepky, T. 1929a. Hängt der Unterschied zw. Voran- u. Nach-stellung des attributiven Adjektivs mit Einheit u. Zweiheit des Apperzeptionsaktes zusammen? Zeitschrift für Romanischen Philologie 49.45–49.Google Scholar
Kalepky, T. 1929b. Die Unterschiedung von ‘apperzeptiver’ und ‘präsentativer’ Rede in ihrer Bedeutung für die Stellung des attributiven Adjektivs im Französischen. Zeitschrift für Romanischen Philologie 49.27–45.Google Scholar
Klein, Flora. MS. The position of the adjective in Spanish.Google Scholar
Lafaye, Pierre B. de. 1858. Dictionnaire des synonymes de la langue française, avec une introduction sur la théorie des synonymes. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Marouzeau, Jules. 1922. L'ordre des mots dans la phrase latine I, II. Paris. Champion.Google Scholar
Meyer, Fritz. 1932. Die Stellung des Adjektivs im Französischen. Neuphilologische Monatsschrift 3.337–48, 385–393.Google Scholar
Milner, J. C. 1967. Esquisse à propos d'une classe limitée d'adjectifs en français moderne. Quarterly Progress Reports, Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT, 84.275–285.Google Scholar
Reiner, Erwin. 1968. La place de l'adjectif épithète en français: theories tradition-elles et essai de solution. (Wiener Romanistische Arbeiten, 7.) Wien: Wilhelm Braumuller.Google Scholar
Richter, Elise. 1903. Zur Entwicklung der romanischen Wortstellung aus der Lateinischen. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Roubaud, Roubaud Pierre Joseph. 1786. Nouveaux synonymes françois, ouvrage dédié à l'Académie Françoise. (Tomes II et IV.) Paris: Moutard.Google Scholar
Sangster, R. B. 1970. The linguistic thought of Roman Jakobson. Bloomington: Indiana University dissertation.Google Scholar
Sangster, R. B., and Waugh, L. R., 1971. The semantics of syntax. To appear in Papers on linguistics and child language: Ruth Hirsch Weir memorial volume, ed. by Honsa, Vladimir & Hardman-de-Bautista, M. J. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sciarone, Bondi. 1967. Sur la place de l'adjectif en français moderne. Zeitschrift für Romanischen Philologie 83.583–598.Google Scholar
Seiler, H.-J. 1960. Relativsatz, Attribut und Apposition. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Stiehm, Bruce G. 1975. Spanish word order in non-sentence constructions. Lg. 51.49–88.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien. 1965. Élements de syntaxe structurale. 2nd ed. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Van Schooneveld, C. H. 1951. The aspect system of the OCS and CR verbum finitum, byti. Word 7.96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Schooneveld, C. H. 1958. The so-called ‘préverbes vides’ and neutralization. Dutch contributions to the 4th International Congress of Slavists, 1–3. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Van Schooneveld, C. H. 1959. A semantic analysis of the old Russian finite preterite system. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Van Schooneveld, C. H. 1960. On the word order in modern Russian. IJSLP 3.40–44.Google Scholar
Van Schooneveld, C. H. 1964. Zur vergleichenden semantischen Struktur der Wortfolge in der russischen, deutschen, französischen und englischen Sprache. Wiener Slavistisches Jahrbuch 2.94–100.Google Scholar
Van Schooneveld, C. H. 1967. On the opposition determinate-indeterminate in the contemporary standard Russian verb. American contributions to the 6th International Congress of Slavists, 1.351–357. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Van Schooneveld, C. H. 1970. On the morphemic structure of the Slavic word and Greenberg's twenty-eighth universal. The Slavic word, ed. by Worth, Dean S., 443–448. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Van Schooneveld, C. H. MS. Semantic transmutations. Prolegomena to a calculus of meaning, I: the cardinal semantic structure of prepositions, cases, and paratactic conjunctions in contemporary standard Russian. To appear. Bloomington, Ind.: Physsardt Publishers.Google Scholar
Waugh, Linda R. 1975. A semantic analysis of the French tense system. To appear in Orbis.Google Scholar
Waugh, Linda R. MS a. A semantic analysis of word order: adjective position in French (Cornell linguistic contributions). To appear. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, Linda R. MS b. A redefinition of the morpheme. To appear in Prosodica: papers in honor of Dwight L. Bolinger, ed. by Waugh, L. R. & van Schooneveld, C. H. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
Waugh, Linda R. MS c. Lexical meaning: the prepositions en and dans in French. To appear in Lingua.Google Scholar
Waugh, Linda R. MS d. The French subjunctive.Google Scholar
Weil, Henri. 1844. De l'ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: Crapelet.Google Scholar
Wydler, K. 1956. Zur Stellung des attributiven Adjektivs vom Latein bis zum Neufranzösischen. Berne: Francke.Google Scholar