Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T11:19:41.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Semantics of Gender in Mayali: Partially Parallel Systems and Formal Implementation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Nicholas Evans ,
Dunstan Brown  and
Greville G. Corbett
Nicholas Evans*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Dunstan Brown*
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
Greville G. Corbett*
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
*
Evans, Dept. of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia [n.evans@linguistics.unimelb.edu.au]
Brown/Corbett, Surrey Morphology Group, Linguistic and International Studies, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK [d. brown@surrey.ac.uk]
[g.corbett@surrey.ac.uk]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mayali has four genders and five morphological classes, with formal identity between the gender prefixes and four of the morphological class prefixes. Gender and morphological class are assigned according to different but largely overlapping semantic principles. We analyze these partially overlapping systems within the network morphology framework; an implemented model demonstrates that the analysis gives the correct forms for the majority of nouns in a basic lexicon, and further extends to understanding assignment in the avoidance register. Our account depends on recognizing two different types of default: normal case default, the expected outcome in a given domain, and exceptional case default, the last resort short of full lexical specification.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , March 2002 , pp. 111 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aronoff, Mark. 1992. Noun classes in Arapesh. Yearbook of Morphology 1991. 1991–32.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Asher, R. E. 1985. Tamil. (Croom Helm Descriptive Grammars.) London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Baker, Brett. 2001. How referential is agreement? The interpretation of polysynthetic disagreement morphology in Ngalakgan. Problems of polysynthesis, ed. by Evans, Nicholas and Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Brock, John. 1988. Top end native plants. Winnellie, Northern Territory: John Brock.Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan. 1998. Defining ‘subgender’: Virile and devirilised nouns in Polish. Lingua 104.197–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capell, Arthur, and Hinch, Heather. 1970. Maung grammar, texts and vocabulary. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Peter. 1976. Kunwinjku (Gunwinggu): A language of Western Arnhem Land. Canberra: Australian National University master's thesis.Google Scholar
Chaloupka, George, and Giuliani, Pina. 1984. Gundulk abel Gundalg: Mayali Flora. Northern Territory Museum of Arts and Sciences. Darwin.Google Scholar
Cogger, Harold G. 1983. Reptiles and amphibians of Australia. French's Forest: A. H. and A. W. Reed.Google Scholar
Coleman, Carolyn. 1993. Comparative file: Insects, bugs and crawlies. On file at Carolyn Coleman, Maningrida CEC machine, Operations North, Northern Territory Department of Education.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G., and Fraser, Norman M. 2000. Default genders. In: Gender in grammar and cognition (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 124.), ed. by Unterbeck, Barbara, Rissanen, Matti, Nevalainen, Terttu, and Saari, Mirja, 55–97. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dixon, K. M. W. 1971. A method of semantic description. Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology, ed. by Steinberg, Danny D. and Jakobovits, Leon A., 436–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 1991. Draft Mayali dictionary. [http://coombs.anu.edu.au/Special Project ASEDA/ASEDA.html]Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 1992. Macassan loans in Top End languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 12. 12–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 1995. The syntax and semantics of body parts in Gun-djeihmi. The grammar of inalienability, ed. by Chappell, Hilary and McGregor, William, 65–109. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 1997a. Head classes and agreement classes in the Mayali dialect chain. Nominal classification in Aboriginal Australia, ed. by Harvey, Mark and Reid, Nicholas, 105–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 1997b. Role or cast? Noun incorporation and complex predicates in Mayali. Complex predicates, ed. by Alsina, Alex, Bresnan, Joan, and Sells, Peter, 397–430. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 1997c. Sign metonymies and the problem of flora-fauna polysemy in Australian linguistics. Boundary rider. Essays in honour of Geoffrey O'Grady, ed. by Tryon, Darrell and Walsh, Michael, 133–53. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 1997d. Macassan loans and linguistic stratigraphy among the Iwaidjan languages. Archaeology and linguistics: Global perspectives on ancient Australia, ed. by McConvell, Patrick and Evans, Nicholas, 237–59. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2002. A pan-dialectal grammar of Bininj Gun-wok: Mayali, Kunwinjku and Kune. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, in press.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, Brown, Dunstan; and Corbett, Greville G. 1998. Emu divorce: A unified account of gender and noun class assignment in Mayali. Chicago Linguistic Society 34. 34–72.Google Scholar
Evans, Roger, and Gazdar, Gerald. 1989a. Inference in DATR. Proceedings of the fourth conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Manchester, England, 66–71.Google Scholar
Evans, Roger, and Gazdar, Gerald. 1989b. The semantics of DATR. Proceedings of the seventh conference of the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour, ed. by Cohn, A. G., 79–87. London: Pitman/Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Evans, Roger, and Gazdar, Gerald. 1996. DATR: A language for lexical knowledge representation. Computational Linguistics 22.167–216.Google Scholar
Fortune, Reo F. 1942. Arapesh. Publications of the American Ethnological Society 19. New York: Augustin.Google Scholar
Fraser, Norman M., and Corbett, Greville G. 1995. Gender, animacy and declensional class assignment: A unified account for Russian. Yearbook of Morphology 1994. 1994–50.Google Scholar
Fraser, Norman M., and Corbett, Greville G. 1997. Defaults in Arapesh. Lingua 103. 103–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garde, Murray. 1996. ‘Saying nothing’: The language of joking relationships in Aboriginal Australia. Darwin: Northern Territory University graduate diploma thesis.Google Scholar
Garde, Murray. 1997. Kuninjku dictionary. [http://coombs.anu.edu.au/Special Proj/ASEDA/ASEDA.html]Google Scholar
Garrett, R. N. 1986. Reproduction in Queensland barramundi (Lates calcarifer). Management of wild and cultured sea bass/barramundi (Lates calcarifer), ed. by Copland, J. W. and Grey, D. L., 38–43. Darwin: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Grant, E. M. 1982. Guide to fishes. Brisbane: Queensland Government.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1959. Gunwinjgu field notes. Australian Institute for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies: Canberra. ms.Google Scholar
Harris, Joy Kinslow. 1970. Gunkurrng, a mother-in-law language. Pacific Linguistics studies in honour of Arthur Capell, ed. by Wurm, Stephen and Laycock, Don, 783–89. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Harvey, Mark. 1997. Nominal classification and gender in Aboriginal Australia. Nominal classification in Aboriginal Australia, ed. by Harvey, Mark and Reid, Nicholas. 17–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, John. 1979. Guugu-Yimidhirr brother-in-law language. Language in Society 8.365–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1984. Functional grammar of Nunggubuyu. Canberra: AIAS.Google Scholar
Keller, Bill. 1995. DATR theories and DATR models. Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Cambridge MA, 55–62.Google Scholar
Manakgu, Andrew. 1996. Kunbalak. Stories for Kunwinjku young people in mother-in-law language, ordinary Kunwinjku and English. Kunbarllanjnja (Oenpelli): Kunwinjku Language Centre.Google Scholar
Manakgu, Hopie, and Djayhgurrnga, Esther. 1985. Kunkurrng dja Kundebi. N.T.: Batchelor College, Batchelor, Northern Territory, Australia, ms.Google Scholar
Merlan, Francesca. 1982. Land, language and social identity in Aboriginal Australia. Mankind 13.133–48.Google Scholar
Merlan, Francesca. 1983. Ngalakan grammar, texts and vocabulary. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Moore, Raymond. 1979. Natural sex inversion in the giant perch (Lates calcarifer). Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 30.801–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Raymond. 1982. Spawning and early life history of barramundi, Lates calcarifer (Bloch), in Papua New Guinea. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 33.671–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, Lynette F. 1964. A tentative description of the Gunwinggu language (of Western Arnhem Land). Sydney: Oceania Linguistic Monographs.Google Scholar
Pensalfini, Rob. 2000. Optional disagreement and the case for feature hierarchies. Chicago Linguistic Society 35.343–353.Google Scholar
Russell-Smith, Jeremy. 1985. Studies in the jungle: People, fire and monsoon forest. Archaeological research in Kakadu National Park, ed. by Jones, Rhys, 242–267. Canberra: ANPWS Special Publication No. 13.Google Scholar
Simpson, Ken, and Day, Nicolas. 1984. Field guide to the birds of Australia. South Yarra, Victoria: Viking O'Neil.Google Scholar
Smyth, D. M., and Von Sturmer, John R. 1981. The use of plants by the Aboriginal people in the Oenpelli region of Western Arnhem Land. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, ms.Google Scholar
Sridhar, Shikaripur N. 1990. Kannada. London: Routledge. (Descriptive Grammars series)Google Scholar
Strahan, Ron (ed.) 1983. The Australian museum complete book of Australian mammals. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1954. Is a structural dialectology possible? Word 10.388–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar