Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T21:05:17.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Starting points

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Brian MacWhinney
Brian MacWhinney*
Affiliation:
University of Denver
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper indicates how sentence processing depends upon the active construction of a perspective, which is the way a speaker or a listener becomes actively involved in a sentence. For this reason, the perspective is usually the starting point of the sentence. A number of linguistic and psycholinguistic studies are reviewed in the light of this approach to sentence processing.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , March 1977 , pp. 152 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, B. 1963. The short-term retention of active and passive sentences. Doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Audley, R. J., and Wallis, C. P. 1964. Response instructions and the speed of relative judgments, I: Some experiments on brightness discrimination. British Journal of Psychology 55. 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beneš, E. 1959. Začátek německe věty z hlediska aktuálního členění větného. Časopis pro Moderni Filologa 41. 205–15.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. Cognition and the development of language, ed. by Hayes, J., 279–362. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, A. 1967. Prompted recall of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6. 203–6.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, A. 1967. Prompted recall of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6. 674–6.Google Scholar
Boucher, J., and Osgood, C. 1969. The Pollyanna hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, P. A., and Just, M. A. 1972. Semantic control of eye movements during picture scanning in a sentence-picture verification task. Perception and Psychophysics 12. 61–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. 1958. Process and content in psycholinguistics. Current trends in the description and analysis of behavior, ed. by Patton, R., 175–200. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. 1965. Some structural properties of simple active and passive sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 4. 365–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. 1969. Linguistic processes in reasoning. Psychological Review 76. 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. 1974. Semantics and comprehension. Current trends in linguistics, Vol. 12, ed. by Sebeok, T. A., 1291–1428. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. 1969. The role of semantics in remembering comparative sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology 83. 545–53.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. 1972. Perceptual coding strategies in the formation and verification of descriptions. Memory and Cognition 2. 101–11.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. 1976. Comprehension and the given-new contrast. To appear in Discourse production and comprehension, ed. by Freedle, R. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Coleman, E. B. 1965. Learning of prose written in four grammatical transformations. Journal of Applied Psychology 49. 332–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, S. H. 1972. Interaction of encoding and retrieval in relative age judgments: an extension of the ‘crossover’ effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 94. 291–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertel, S. 1974a. Satzsubjekt und Ich-Perspektive. Bericht über den 28. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie, 1. 129–39. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Ertel, S. 1974b. Gestaltpsychologische Denkmodelle fur die Struktur der Sprache. Gestalttheorie in der modernen Psychologie, ed. by Ertel, S., Kemmler, L., Stadler, M., & Steinkopf, D., 94–105. Darmstadt: D. Steinkopf.Google Scholar
Ertel, S. 1975. Affirmation and negation as constructive action. Psychological Research 37. 335–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firbas, J. 1964. On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 1. 267–80.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. 1966. Non-thematic subjects in contemporary English. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 2. 239–56.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3. 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, S. E., and Clark, H. H. 1974. What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13. 512–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Eisenberg, K.; and Strauss, S. 1968. Comprehension: relation between perceived action and logical subject. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 7. 527–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Eisenberg, K.; and Strauss, S. 1968. Comprehension and a statement's relation to the situation it describes. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 7. 300–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Eisenberg, K.; and Strauss, S. 1971. Comprehension of instructions in varying contexts. Cognitive Psychology 2. 369–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, C. T. 1972. Theme and imagery in the recall of active and passive sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11. 205–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, C. T. 1973. The reconstructive process in sentence memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12. 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. G. 1967. Syntactic position and rated meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6. 240–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1968a. The choice of the passive voice in a communicative task. British Journal of Psychology 59. 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1968b. The interpretation of the passive voice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20. 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M., and Carpenter, P. 1971. Comprehension of negation with quantification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10. 244–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. 1974. The representation of meaning in memory. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. 1975. Three perspectives in the functional approach to syntax. Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism, 276–336. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
Lindsley, J. R. 1975. Producing simple sentences: how far ahead do we plan? Cognitive Psychology 7. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 1975. The development of English and Hungarian pragmatics. Paper presented at the Third International Child Language Symposium, London.Google Scholar
Marks, D. F. 1972. Relative judgment: a phenomenon and a theory. Perception and Psychophysics 11. 156–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathesius, V. 1939. O tak zvaném aktuálním členěni věty. Slovo a Slovesnost 5. 171–4.Google Scholar
Olson, D., and Filby, N. 1972. On the comprehension of active and passive sentences. Cognitive Psychology 3. 361–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, C. 1971. Where do sentences come from? Semantics, ed. by Steinberg, D. & Jakobovits, L., 497–529. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., and Goldman, S. R. 1974. Thematization and sentence retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13. 70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. 1952. The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. 1971. Mental imagery in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Prentice, J. L. 1966. Response strength of single words as an influence in sentence behavior. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5. 429–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. 1968. Sentence structure and the reading process. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipley, W., Coffin, J.; and Hadsell, K. 1945. Affective distance and other factors determining reaction time in judgments of color preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology 35. 206–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 1968. Recall of full and truncated passive sentences in connected discourse. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 7. 861–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolov, A. N. 1972. Inner speech and thought. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenbaum, P. H., and Williams, F. 1968. Generation of active and passive sentences as a function of subject or object focus. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 7. 246–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travniček, F. 1962. O tak zvaném aktuálním členěni větném Slovo a Slovesnost 22. 163–71.Google Scholar
Turner, E. A., and Rommetveit, R. 1967. Experimental manipulation of the production of active and passive voice in children. Language and Speech 10. 169–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, E. A., and Rommetveit, R. 1968. Focus of attention in recall of active and passive sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 7. 543–48.Google Scholar
Wallis, C. P., and Audley, R. J. 1964. Response instructions and the speed of relative judgments, II: pitch discrimination. British Journal of Psychology 55. 133–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, P. 1969. Transformations and the understanding of sentences. Language and Speech 12. 156–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed