Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T09:30:35.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface Word-Order Typology and Universal Grammar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Peter Coopmans
Peter Coopmans*
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper criticizes the view of Hawkins (1979, 1980, 1982) that the theory of Universal Grammar must include implicational and distributional universals of word order. It shows that universals based on frequency counts of surface word order—as worked out, e.g., by Greenberg 1966—need to be reformulated in order to be relevant to the problem of language acquisition. More specifically, it discusses H's claim that the principle of Cross-Category Harmony can shed light on the proper formulations of the X' schemas of generative grammar. Finally, it is shown how survey studies of word order can be relevant to forming initial hypotheses about certain properties of grammar, and how the study of language typology might proceed within the generative framework.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 55 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, Mona. 1978. NP preposing in noun phrases. NELS 8.12–21.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon. 1962. The order of elements in a transformational grammar of German. Lg. 38.263–69.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans den. 1977. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. University of Amsterdam, MS.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1963. Grammatik des deutschen Verbs. (Studia grammatica, 2.) Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Remarks on nominalization. In his Studies on semantics in generative grammar, 11–61. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. A festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. by Anderson, Stephen and Kiparsky, Paul, 232–86. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. Formal syntax, ed. by Culicover, Peter et al., 71–132. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coopmans, Peter. 1983. Review of Comrie 1981. Journal of Linguistics 19.455–73.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1981. Word order in generative grammar. Journal of Linguistic Research 1.33–54.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Some universals with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Universals of language, 2nd edition, ed. by Greenberg, J. H., 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1974. Language typology: A historical and analytic overview. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1979. Implicational universals as predictors of word order change. Lg. 55.618–48.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1980. On implicational and distributional universals of word order. Journal of Linguistics 16.193–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1982. Notes on cross-category harmony, X' and predictions of markedness. Journal of Linguistics 18.1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1977. S and X'-convention. Linguistic Analysis 3.137–76.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X'-syntax: A study of phrase structure. (LI monograph 2.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Lyle. 1979. The genetics of language. Linguistics and Philosophy 3.105–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1975. Dutch as an SOV language. Linguistic Analysis 1.111–36.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu, and Wongkhontong, Preya. 1981. Relative clauses in Thai. Studies in Language 5.195–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David W. 1979a. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David W. 1979b. Review article on Mechanisms of syntactic change, ed. by Li, Charles. Lg. 55.381–95.Google Scholar
Riemsdijk, Henk van, and Williams, Edwin. 1981. NP-structure. Linguistic Review 1.171–217.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil V. 1981. Consistency, markedness and language change: On the notion ‘consistent language’. Journal of Linguistics 17.39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stowell, Tim. 1981. Origins of phrase structure. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1972. Analogy in generative grammar: The origin of word order. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguistics, ed. by Heilman, Luigi, 2.79–83. Bologna: Mulino.Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. 1976. Towards Proto-Indo-European syntax: Problems and pseudoproblems. Papers from the Parasession on Diachronie Syntax, 305–26. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar