Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T03:34:16.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The syntax of voice in Russian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Leonard H. Babby and
Richard D. Brecht
Leonard H. Babby
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Richard D. Brecht
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is argued here that the syntactic relations between active, passive, and ‘middle’ sentences in Russian cannot be stated in their most general form as long as the grammar of Russian contains a Passive transformation. We propose a theory that defines Voice as the relationship between a verb's subcategorization feature and the surface form of the sentence in which it occurs. This relationship may be optionally expressed by a Voice morpheme on the verb. Languages differ in the number and function of the Voice morphemes they employ: but Russian, we argue, contains only one such morpheme, and its occurrence signals a marked realization of a verb's subcategorization feature.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , June 1975, pp. 342 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adamec, P. 1973. Očerk funkcial'no-transformacionnogo sintaksisa sovremennogo russkogo jazyka, I: Odnobasovye predloženija. Praha: Statní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Babby, L. 1973. The deep structure of adjectives and participles in Russian. Lg. 49.349–360.Google Scholar
Babby, L. 1974. A transformational grammar of Russian adjectives. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Babby, L. 1975. A transformational analysis of transitive -SJA verbs in Russian. To appear in Lingua.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondarko, A. V., and Bulanin, L. L. 1967. Russkij glagol. Leningrad: Prosveščenie.Google Scholar
Bowers, J. 1973. Grammatical relations. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. Readings in English transformational grammar, ed. by Jacobs, R. & Rosenbaum, P., 184–221. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. MS. Causatives and universal grammar.Google Scholar
Damerau, N. 1967. Polnische grammatik. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, J. 1970. Root and structure-preserving transformations. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. 1968. The case for case. Universals in linguistic theory, ed. by Bach, E. & Harms, R., 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Halle, M. 1973. Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry 4.3–16.Google Scholar
Harrison, W. 1967. Expression of the passive voice. (Studies in the modern Russian language, 4–5.) Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, K. 1968. The passive construction in English. Lg. 44.230–243.Google Scholar
Isačenko, A. V. 1960. Grammatičeskij stroj russkogo jazyka v sopostavlenii s slovackim, II. Bratislava: Izdatel'stvo Slovackoj Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1971a. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Selected writings II, 130–147. The Hague: Mouton. [Originally published in 1957.].Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1971b. Morfologičeskie nabljudenija nad slavjanskim skloneniem. Selected writings II, 154–183. The Hague: Mouton. [Originally published in 1962.].Google Scholar
Katz, J., and Postal, P. 1964. An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mel'čuk, I. A., and Xolodovič, A. A. 1970. K teorii grammatičeskogo zaloga. Narody Azii i Afriki 1970:4.111–124.Google Scholar
Miller, J. 1973. A generative account of the ‘category of state’ in Russian. Generative grammar in Europe, ed. by Kiefer, F. & Ruwet, N. (Foundations of Language, supplement series, 13), 333–359. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, R. 1966. Predicate complementation in contemporary Polish. Harvard University dissertation.Google Scholar
Růžička, R. 1966. Studien zur Theorie der russischen Syntax. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Šapiro, A. B. 1953. Očerk po sintaksisu russkix narodnyx govorov. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Schaarschmidt, G. 1968. The syntax of sja-verbs in Russian. Bloomington: Indiana University dissertation.Google Scholar
Valesio, P. 1971. The distinction of active and passive. Linguistic Inquiry 2.407–414.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, V. V., and Švedova, N. Ju. 1964. Izmenenija v sisteme prostogo i osložnennogo predloženija v russkom literaturnom jazyke XIX veka. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Xolodovič, A. A. (ed.) 1970. Kategorija zaloga: materialy konferencii. Leningrad: Institut Jazykoznanija AN SSSR, Leningradskoe Otdelenie.Google Scholar
Zemskaja, E. A. (ed.) 1973. Russkaja razgovornaja reč'. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Žižina, S. A. 1965. K voprosu o sootnošenii glagolov s časticej -sja, mestoimeniem sebja i slovosečetanijami tipa drug druga (na materiale raboty v bolgarskix gruppax). (Russkij jazyk dlja studentov-inostrancev.) Moskva.Google Scholar