¹ The following works are cited by the author's name: Fr. Bechtel, Lexilogus zu Homer (Halle, 1914); Paul Cauer, Grundfragen der Homerkritik ³ (Leipzig, 1924); P. Chantraine, Grammaire homérique (Paris, 1942, 1953); E. Risch, Wortbildung der homerischen Sprache (Berlin-Leipzig, 1937); W. Schulze, Quaestiones epicae (Gütersloh, 1892); J. Wackernagel (a), Sprachliche Untersuchungen zu Homer (Göttingen, 1916); J. Wackernagel (b), Vorlesungen über Syntax (Basel, 1926, 1928).

² At the time I argued to the same effect; see AJP 33.401 ff. (1912). In spite of Bechtel's acceptance of Solmsen's theory, my opinion has remained unchanged; cf. Lg. 27.74 fn. 10 (1951). Compare Cauer 151 n. 13, and for other references see Schwyzer, Gr. Gr. 1.229.

³ There is no need to consider the Odyssey, since all of it was composed after the loss of F. In his Homerische Kunstsprache 204, Meister makes a surprising statement: ‘In der Odyssee kommt nur 'ένεκ εἲvεκ’ 'έvεκεv, nicht εἲνεκα vor.’ But εἲνεκα is frequent, and 'έvεκα is not cited by Gehring except under oὔνεκα and τoὔvεκα. Any significance that the facts may have will be in another connection.