Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:42:11.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vowel Features

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Mona Lindau
Mona Lindau*
Affiliation:
University of Ibadan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents an inventory of the features that are necessary to describe vowel systems in the languages of the world. The relationship between the features and their articulatory and acoustic correlates is explored. Some vowel features, like High and Back, are accounted for in both articulatory and acoustic terms. Others, like Peripheral, are best described with reference to the acoustic domain. When the number of contrasts of each feature is considered, some features turn out to be multivalued.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , September 1978 , pp. 541 - 563
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abercrombie, D. 1967. Elements of general phonetics. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Ali, L. H., and Daniloff, R. G. 1972. A cinefluorographic-phonological investigation of emphatic sound assimilation in Arabic. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed. by Rigault, A. & Charbonneau, R., 639–48. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Allen, C. A. 1974. Studies in the phonology of Sele—the language of Santrokofi. MA thesis. Legon: University of Ghana.Google Scholar
Andersen, P. 1954. Dansk fonetik. Nordisk Lærebog for Talepædagoger, vol. 1, 308–53. København,Google Scholar
Bearth, T., and Zemp, H. 1967. The phonology of Dan (Santa). Journal of African Languages 6.9–29.Google Scholar
Bell, A. M. 1867. Visible speech. London.Google Scholar
Bendor-Samuel, J. T. 1971. Niger-Congo: Gur. Current trends in linguistics VII, ed. by Sebeok, T., 141–78. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bergman, R. 1971. Vowel sandhi and word division in Igede. Journal of West African Languages 8.13–28.Google Scholar
Bruce, G. 1970. Diphthongization in the Malmö dialect. Working Papers, Lund University Phonetics Laboratory, 3.1–20.Google Scholar
Catford, I. 1977. Fundamental problems in phonetics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., and Halle, M. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cook, T. L. 1969. Some tentative notes on the KòHúmónò language. Research Notes from the Dept. of Ling. & Nigerian Language, U. of Ibadan, 2:3.1–49.Google Scholar
Delattre, P. 1951. The physiological interpretation of sound spectrograms. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 65.864–75.Google Scholar
Delattre, P, and Freeman, D. C. 1968. A dialect study of American r's by x-ray motion picture. Linguistics 44.29–68.Google Scholar
Dunstan, E. 1966. Tone and concord in Ngwe nominals. University of London doctoral thesis.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1939. The vowels of the Badaga language. Lg. 15.43–7.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. 1963. Assumptions about nasals: a sample study in phonological universals. Universals of language, ed. by Greenberg, J., 42–7. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, E. 1972. Formant frequencies of long and short Danish vowels. Studies for Einar Haugen, ed. by Firchow, E. S. et al., 189–213. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francescato, G. 1970. Studi linguistici sul Friulano. (Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettre ‘La Colombaria’, Studi, 18.) Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar
Hadding, K., and Abramson, A. S., 1964. Duration versus spectrum in Swedish vowels: some perceptual experiments. Studia Linguistica 18.94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, B. L., et al. 1974. Nilo-Saharan vowel harmony from the vantage point of Kalenjin. Afrika und Übersee 57.241–67.Google Scholar
Halle, M. 1970. Is Kabardian a vowelless language? Foundations of Language 6.95–103.Google Scholar
Halle, M, and Stevens, K. N. 1969. On the feature ‘Advanced Tongue Root’. Quarterly Progress Report, MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics, 94.209–15.Google Scholar
Harshman, R., Ladefoged, P.; and Goldstein, L. 1977. Factor analysis of tongue shapes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62.693–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockett, C. F. 1955. A manual of phonology. (Indiana University publications in anthropology and linguistics, Memoir 11.) Baltimore.Google Scholar
Hoogshagen, S. 1959. Three contrastive vowel lengths in Mixe. Zeitschrift für Phonetik und Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 12.111–15.Google Scholar
House, A. S. 1957. Analog studies of nasal consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 22.190–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyman, L. 1975. Phonology: theory and analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Jones, D. 1917. An English pronouncing dictionary. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Jones, D. 1956. Outline of English phonetics. 8th ed. Cambridge: Heffer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joos, M. 1948. Acoustic phonetics. (Language monograph 23). Baltimore: LSA.Google Scholar
Kelkar, A. R., and Trisal, P. N. 1964. Kashmiri word phonology: a first sketch. Anthropological Linguistics 6:1.13–22.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. 1966. A note on lip-rounding. Le Maître Phonétique 125.8–9.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. 1964. A phonetic study of West African languages. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. 1971. Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. 1975. A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. MS. The phonetic specification of the languages of the world. To appear in Proceedings of the 8th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Leeds, 1975.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P., Harshman, R., Goldstein, L.; and Rice, L. MS. Vowel articulations and formant frequencies.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. L. 1967. Turkish grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. W. 1972. A concise pronouncing dictionary of British and American English. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. 1968. Akha phonology. Anthropological Linguistics 10:2.8–18.Google Scholar
Liljenkrants, J., and Lindblom, B. 1972. Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: the role of perceptual contrast. Lg. 48.829–62.Google Scholar
Lindau, M. 1974. The feature Advanced Tongue Root. Third Annual Conference on African Linguistics, ed. by Voeltz, E., 127–34. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Lindau, M. 1975. Features for vowels. (UCLA working papers in phonetics, 30). Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. 1972. Verb nominal contraction in Eggon. Research Notes 5:2/3.51-8. Ibadan: Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. D. 1973. Phonetics. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. 1974. Experimental historical phonology. Historical Linguistics II: theory and description in phonology (Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Historical Linguistics), ed. by Anderson, J. M. & Jones, C., 353–89. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Ohala, M. MS. Aspects of Hindi phonology. To be published by Motilal Banarsidas, Delhi.Google Scholar
Painter, C. 1973. Cineradiographic data on the feature ‘Covered’ in Twi vowel harmony. Phonetica 28.97–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkell, J. 1971. Physiology of speech production: a preliminary study of two suggested revisions of the features specifying vowels. Quarterly Progress Report, MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics, 102.123–39.Google Scholar
Pike, K. 1967. Tongue root position in practical phonetics. Phonetica 17.129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Retord, G. L. A. 1972. L'Agni—variété dialectale sanvi: phonologie, analyses tomographiques, documents. Annales de l'Université d'Abidjan, Série H, No. 5, Fascicule 1.Google Scholar
Rice, L. 1971. A new line analog speech synthesizer for the PDP-12. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 17.29–57.Google Scholar
Ruhlen, M. 1973. Nasal vowels. Working Papers on Language Universals, Stanford University, 12.1–36.Google Scholar
Sedlak, P. 1969. Typological considerations of vowel quality systems. Working Papers on Language Universals, Stanford University, 1.1–40.Google Scholar
Spore, P. 1965. La langue danoise: phonétique et grammaire contemporaines. København: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. N., and Blumstein, S. E. 1975. Quantal aspects of consonant production and perception: a study of retroflex stop consonants. Journal of Phonetics 3.215–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J. M. 1967. Tongue root position in Akan vowel harmony. Phonetica 16.185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J. M. 1971. Niger-Congo, Kwa. Current trends in linguistics VII, ed. by Sebeok, T., 179–212. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. 1973. Problems in the interpretation of the great English vowel shift. Studies in linguistics in honor of George L. Trager, ed. by Smith, M. E., 344–62. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. 1877. Handbook of phonetics. London.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. 1969. A grammatical description of the Engenni language. University of London doctoral thesis.Google Scholar
Uldall, E. T. 1958. American ‘molar’ r and ‘flapped’ r. Revista do Laboratório de Fonetica Experimental, Coimbra, 4.103–6.Google Scholar
Uldall, H. J. 1933. A Danish phonetic reader. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Vanvik, A. 1972. A phonetic-phonemic analysis of standard eastern Norwegian, part 1. Norwegian Journal of Linguistics 26.119–64.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. 1972. Hugo Schuchardt's theory of phonological change. Schuchardt, the neogrammarians, and the transformational theory of phonological change, by Schuchardt, H., Vennemann, T., & T., H. Wilbur, 115–204. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T., and Ladefoged, P. 1973. Phonetic features and phonological features. Lingua 32.61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wängler, H.-H. 1961. Atlas deutscher Sprachlaute. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Wang, W. 1968. Vowel features, paired variables, and the English vowel shift. Lg. 44.694–708.Google Scholar
Welmers, W. 1973. African language structures. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, K. 1972. Assimilation in Ọgbia. Research Notes from the Dept. of Ling. & Nigerian Languages, U. of Ibadan, 5:2/3.1-5.Google Scholar
Williamson, K. 1974. Some reduced vowel harmony systems. Research Notes from the Dept. of Ling. & Nigerian Languages, U. of Ibadan, 6.145–70.Google Scholar
Williamson, K. 1977. Multivalued features for consonants. Lg. 53.843–71.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. 1969. A comparative vocabulary of Abuan dialects. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Shi Feng. 1974. Report on a survey of the dialects of Yunan. Academia Sinica, Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Special issue, 66.1016–31.Google Scholar
Zannier, G. 1972. El friulano. Montevideo: Universidad de la República.Google Scholar
Zimmer, K. 1969. Psychological correlates of some Turkish morpheme structure conditions. Lg. 45.309–21.Google Scholar