Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T17:38:12.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct- and indirect-driven reactor targets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

K. Kiu
K. Kiu
Affiliation:
Teikyo University of Technology, Uruido, Ichihara, Chiba 290–01, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Theoretical and numerical analyses are given for direct- and indirect-driven reactor targets, from which 3-GJ fusion output energy is released. For a reactor target, which has a large radius and long implosion time, supersonic flow of imploding D–T fuel in the converging nozzle (in sphere) is important for adiabatic compression of fuel. For a direct-driven target, pellet gain depends much upon the region where the beam deposits its energy. Phase mixing is also important to increase the absorption rate of irradiating laser light. When a strong light with a phase is concentrated on a small region of target surface, collective electron motion on the target surface radiates electromagnetic waves, which reduce the electron motion. When beam irradiation on the target is not uniform, an indirect-driven target must be used because a direct-driven target is weak for nonuniform irradiation. For an indirect-driven reactor target, which requires a long implosion time, expansion of radiator and absorber layers causes the decrease in radiation temperature. There is the optimum target structure with respect to the aspect ratio (radiation gap distance).

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1993, pp. 97 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Deutsch, C.G. et al. 1989 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 278, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, D.H.H. et al. 1989 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 278, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrory, R.L. 1991 In the 21st ECLIM Book of Abstracts, abstr. I-11.Google Scholar
Murakami, M. & Meyer-Ter-Vehn, J. 1991a Nucl. Fusion 31, 1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, M. & Meyer-Ter-Vehn, J. 1991b Nucl. Fusion 31, 1331.Google Scholar
Niu, K. 1989 Laser Particle Beams 7, 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, K. & Aoki, T. 1988 Fluid Dyn. Res. 4, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, K. et al. 1988 Laser Particle Beams 6, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, K. et al. 1991a Laser Particle Beams 9, 149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, K. et al. 1991b Laser Particle Beams 9, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storm, E.K. 1991 In the 21st ECLIM Book of Abstracts, abstr. I-2.Google Scholar
Tahir, N.A. & Arnold, R.C. 1991 Phys. Fluids B 3, 1717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tahir, N.A. & Deutsch, C. 1991 In the Abstracts of the 10th International Workshop on Laser Interaction Monterey, p. 71.Google Scholar
Velarde, G. et al. 1988 Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 278, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamanaka, T. 1991 In the 21st ECLIM Book of Abstracts, abstr. I-13.Google Scholar