Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T11:28:11.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2010

Laura Kalman
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

“She was always poking holes in balloons,” a friend said of the late and justly beloved Kathryn Preyer. These two outstanding articles, the first winners of the Preyer Competition, do that too. Together, they suggest that the Cold War affected domestic life in different ways than we have assumed.

Information

Type
Forum: “Poking Holes in Balloons”: New Approaches to Cold War Civil Rights
Information
Law and History Review , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , Summer 2008, pp. 319 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois 2008

References

1. Long, Tom, “Kathryn Preyer, 80; Scholar in History Taught at Wellesley,” Boston Globe (April 21, 2005), C15.Google Scholar

2. Botson, Michael R. Jr, Labor, Civil Rights, and the Hughes Tool Company (College Station: Texas A&M Press, 2005), 4, 181Google Scholar ; Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)Google Scholar ; Hughes Tool, 147 NLRB 1573 (1964)Google Scholar.

3. Kluger, Richard, Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for Equality (New York: Knopf, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Reva Siegel, “Equality Talk: Antisubordination and Anticlassification Values in Struggles over Brown,” http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/Equality Talk - Hein.pdf

5. Rosenberg, Gerald, The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar

6. Dudziak, Mary, Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000), 104.Google Scholar

7. Klarman, Michael, From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 385.Google Scholar

8. Bell, Derrick, Silent Covenants: Brown v. Board of Education and the Unfulfilled Hopes for Racial Reform (New York: Oxford Univesity Press, 2004), 21–27.Google Scholar

9. Hall, Jacquelyn Dowd, “The Long Civil Rights Movement and the Political Uses of the Past,” Journal of American History 91 (2005): 1233–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Gilmore, Glenda, Defying Dixie: The Radical Roots of Civil Rights, 1919–1950 (New York: W. W. Norton, 2008)Google Scholar.

10. Gilmore, , Defying Dixie, at 9, 6.Google Scholar

11. Biondi, Martha, To Stand and Fight: The Struggle for Civil Rights in Postwar New York City (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003)Google Scholar.

12. Hirsch, Arnold, Making the Second Ghetto: Race and Housing in Chicago, 1940–1960 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983,1998)Google Scholar.

13. Sugrue, Thomas, The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

14. Self, Robert, American Babylon, Race and the Struggle for Postwar Oakland (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003)Google Scholar.

15. Theoharis, Jeanne and Woodard, Komozi, eds., Freedom North: Black Freedom Struggles outside the South, 1940–1980 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16. Mack, Kenneth, “Rethinking Civil Rights Lawyering and Politics in the Era before Brown,” Yale Law Journal 115 (2005): 256–354Google Scholar.

17. Goluboff, Risa, The Lost Promise of Civil Rights (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007), 5Google Scholar.

18. Ibid., at 227, 218.

19. Maclean, Nancy, “Achieving the Promise of the Civil Rights Act: Herbert Hill and the NAACP's Fight for Jobs and Justice,” Labor: Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas 3 (Summer 2006): 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20. Hill, Herbert, “The Problem of Race in American Labor History,” Reviews in American History 24 (1996): 189, 196CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21. Goluboff, Risa, “Let Economic Equality Take Care of Itself: The NAACP, Labor Litigation, and the Making of Civil Rights in the 1940s,” UCLA Law Review 52 (2005): 1400Google Scholar ; Goluboff, , Lost Promise, at 226Google Scholar.

22. I had always assumed that the phrase, “big nothing,” was invented by W. Randall Garr during the 1970s, but I may have been mistaken. See, e.g., Schaffner, Ingrid, Simpson, Bennett, Kother, Jutta, Gould, Claudia, Baer, Jo, James, Gareth, Kelley, Mike, Klein, Yves, Lawler, Louise, Prince, Richard, The Big Nothing (Philadelphia: ICA Philadelphia, 2004).Google Scholar My question here is intended to provoke. I have argued that legal liberalism was something more than a big nothing in Kalman, , The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

23. “We put those payroll contributions there,” Roosevelt famously said of the tax on employee wages, “so as to give the contributors a legal, moral and political right to collect their pensions and unemployment benefits. With those taxes in there, no damn politician can ever scrap my social security program.” Achenbaum, W. Andrew, Social Security: Visions and Revisions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 22–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24. Email, Daniel Ernst to Laura Kalman, August 4, 2006.

25. Abraham, David, “Liberty without Equality: The Property-Rights Connection in a ‘Negative Citizenship’ Regime,” Law and Social Inquiry 21 (1996): 24, n. 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26. Watkins v. U.S., 354 US 178 (1957).

27. Yates v. U.S., 354 US 298 (1957).

28. Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 US 234 (1957).

29. Service v. Dulles, 354 US 363 (1957).

30. Powe, Lucas Jr, The Warren Court and American Politics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000), 98Google Scholar.

31. Ibid. at 154.

32. 363 U.S. 622.

33. Citron, Rodger, “Charles Reich's Journey from the Yale Law Journal to the New York Times Best-Seller List: The Personal History of the Greening of America” (forthcoming, New York Law School Law Review, TAN n. 81)Google Scholar.

34. Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 261, n. 8 (1970). Of course, one can never be certain whether legal scholarship actually influences judges. See, e.g., Kalman, , Strange Career, at 242–44.Google Scholar But it seems likely that Brennan regarded “The New Property” as something more than mere window dressing that enabled him to rationalize a result he wanted to reach. “The New Property” apparently helped him think his way to his destination.

35. Mashaw, Jerry, “Administrative Due Process: The Quest for a Dignitary Theory,” Boston University Law Review 61 (1981): 888Google Scholar ; Mashaw, , Due Process in the Administrative State (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985), 26Google Scholar ; Kornbluh, Felicia, The Battle for Welfare Rights: Politics and Poverty in Modern America (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007), 172–76.Google Scholar Reich himself said, “Judged by the experience of twenty years, the moderate due process, cost-benefit approach to individual security must surely be deemed a failure. We have given it a fair trial, and it does not work.” Reich, Charles, “Beyond the New Property: An Ecological View of Due Process,” Brooklyn Law Review 56 (1990): 732–33Google Scholar.