Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T17:47:16.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Is Transnational Law?

Review products

DetlefVon Daniels. 2010. The Concept of Law from a Transnational Perspective. Burlington, VT/Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing. Pp. x + 225. $119.95 cloth.
Gralf-PeterCalliess, and ZumbansenPeer. 2010. Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law. Portland, OR/Oxford: Hart Publishing. Pp. xvi + 366. $75.00 cloth.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Roger Cotterrell
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Is it important to conceptualize transnational law and “map” it as a new legal field? This article suggests that to do so might help both juristic practice and sociolegal scholarship in organizing, linking, and comparing disparate but increasingly significant types of regulation. To explore the idea of transnational law is to raise basic questions about the nature of both “law” and “society” (taken as the realm law regulates). This involves radically rethinking relationships between the public and the private, between law and state, and between different sources of law and legal authority. Taking as its focus Von Daniels's The Concept of Law from a Transnational Perspective and Calliess and Zumbansen's Rough Consensus and Running Code (both 2010), the article considers what approaches may be most productive, and what key issues need to be addressed, to make sense of broad trends in law's extension beyond the boundaries of nation-states.

Information

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , Spring 2012, pp. 500 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Austin, John. 1885. On the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence. In Lectures on Jurisprudence or the Philosophy of Positive Law, 5th ed., ed. Campbell, Robert, 1071–91. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Barber, N. W. 2006. Legal Pluralism and the European Union. European Law Journal 12:306–29.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, and Sznaider, Natan. 2006. Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences: A Research Agenda. British Journal of Sociology 57:1–22.Google Scholar
Bentley, Sarah. 2011. Ricken Patel is Trying to Bring Governments and Businesses to Heel around the Globe. It's Finger Clicking Good. Times (London), February 9. http://www.scribd.com/doc/48808533/The‐Times‐profile‐of‐Avaaz‐and‐Ricken‐Patel‐Feb‐9‐2011 (accessed April 26, 2011).Google Scholar
Berman, Harold J. 1995. World Law. Fordham International Law Journal 18:1617–22.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2002. The Globalization of Jurisdiction. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151:311–546.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2005. From International Law to Law and Globalization. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 43:485–556.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2006. Book Review Essay—Seeing Beyond the Limits of International Law. Texas Law Review 84:1265–1306.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2007. Global Legal Pluralism. Southern California Law Review 80:1155–1237.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2009. The New Legal Pluralism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5:225–42.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Lisa. 2001. Private Commercial Law in the Cotton Industry: Creating Cooperation through Rules, Norms, and Institutions. Michigan Law Review 99:1724–90.Google Scholar
Calliess, Gralf‐Peter. 2007. The Making of Transnational Contract Law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 14:469–84.Google Scholar
Calliess, Gralf‐Peter, and Renner, Moritz. 2009. Between Law and Social Norms: The Evolution of Global Governance. Ratio Juris 22:260–80.Google Scholar
Calliess, Gralf‐Peter, and Zumbansen, Peer. 2010. Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Colvin, Eric. 1978. The Sociology of Secondary Rules. University of Toronto Law Journal 28:195–214.Google Scholar
Commission on European Contract Law. Principles of European Contract Law. http://frontpage.cbs.dk/law/commission_on_european_contract_law/ (accessed May 16, 2011).Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger. 1995. Law's Community: Legal Theory in Sociological Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2006. Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2008a. Living Law: Studies in Legal and Social Theory. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2008b. Transnational Communities and the Concept of Law. Ratio Juris 21:1–18.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert. 1992. Nomos and Narrative. In Narrative, Violence and the Law: The Essays of Robert Cover, ed. Minow, Martha, Ryan, Michael, and Sarat, Austin, 95–172. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Culver, Keith C., and Giudice, Michael. 2010. Legality's Borders: An Essay in General Jurisprudence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Di Robilant, Anna. 2006. Genealogies of Soft Law. American Journal of Comparative Law 54:499–554.Google Scholar
Dingwall, Robert. 1999. Professions and Social Order in a Global Society. International Review of Sociology 9:131–40.Google Scholar
Djelic, Marie‐Laure, and Quack, Sigrid. 2010. Transnational Communities and Their Impact on the Governance of Business and Economic Activity. In Transnational Communities: Shaping Global Economic Governance, ed. Djelic, Marie‐Laure and Quack, Sigrid, 377–413. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
European Advertising Standards Alliance. About EASA: What Is EASA? http://www.easa‐alliance.org/About‐EASA/Who‐What‐Why‐/page.aspx/110 (accessed May 16, 2011).Google Scholar
Forest Stewardship Council. About FSC. http://www.fsc.org/about‐fsc.html (accessed May 16, 2011).Google Scholar
Froomkin, A. Michael. 2003. Habermas@Discourse.Net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace. Harvard Law Review 116:749–873.Google Scholar
GlobalG.A.P. Welcome to GlobalG.A.P. http://www.globalgap.org/cms/front_content.php?idcat=9 (accessed May 16, 2011).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A. 2005. The Limits of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Carol C. 2007. Transnational Solidarities. Journal of Social Philosophy 38:148–64.Google Scholar
Graver, Hans Petter. 1990. Administrative Decision‐Making and the Concept of Law. In Postinterventionistisches Recht, ed. Görlitz, Axel and Voight, Rüdiger, 177–94. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus‐Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Carruthers, Bruce G. 2007. The Recursivity of Law: Global Norm‐Making and National Law‐Making in the Globalization of Corporate Insolvency Regimes. American Journal of Sociology 112:1135–1202.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1994. The Concept of Law, 2d ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Held, David. 2010. Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn. 2006. A Babel of Judicial Voices? Ruminations from the Bench. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55:791–804.Google Scholar
International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT). UNIDROIT: An Overview. http://www.unidroit.org/dynasite.cfm?dsmid=103284 (accessed May 16, 2011).Google Scholar
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Getting Started in the IETF. http://www.ietf.org/newcomers.html (accessed March 31, 2011).Google Scholar
Jessup, Philip C. 2006. Transnational Law (Extracts). In Philip C. Jessup's Transnational Law Revisited—On the Occasion of the 50th Anniversary of its Publication, ed. Tietje, Christian, Brouder, Alan, and Nowrot, Karsten, 45–55. Halle‐Wittenberg: Martin‐Luther‐Universität. http://www.wirtschaftsrecht.uni‐halle.de/sites/default/files/altbestand/Heft50.pdf (accessed April 18, 2011).Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju. 1996. Transnational Legal Process. Nebraska Law Review 75:181–208.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N. 2008. Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil. 1993. Beyond the Sovereign State. Modern Law Review 56:1–18.Google Scholar
Melissaris, Emmanuel. 2009. Ubiquitous Law: Legal Theory and the Space for Legal Pluralism. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Michaels, Ralf. 2007. The True Lex Mercatoria: Law beyond the State. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 14:447–68.Google Scholar
Michaels, Ralf. 2009. Global Legal Pluralism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5:243–62.Google Scholar
Network Working Group. 2004. IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall Committees (Request for Comments 3777). http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3777 (accessed March 31, 2011).Google Scholar
Payandeh, Mehrdad. 2010. The Concept of International Law in the Jurisprudence of H. L. A. Hart. European Journal of International Law 21:967–95.Google Scholar
Pilkington, Ed. 2011. Avaaz: The Online Activist Network That Is Targeting Rupert Murdoch's Bid. Guardian (London), April 25. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/apr/24/avaaz‐activist‐network‐rupert‐murdoch/print?avaaz (accessed April 26, 2011).Google Scholar
Quack, Sigrid. 2007. Legal Professionals and Transnational Law‐Making: A Case of Distributed Agency. Organization 14:643–66.Google Scholar
Rödl, Florian. 2008. Private Law Beyond the Democratic Order? On the Legitimatory Problem of Private Law “Beyond the State.” American Journal of Comparative Law 56:743–67.Google Scholar
Schultz, Thomas. 2011. Internet Disputes, Fairness in Arbitration and Transnationalism: A Reply to Julia Hörnle. International Journal of Law and Information Technology 19:153–63.Google Scholar
Scott, Colin, Cafaggi, Fabrizio, and Senden, Linda. 2011. The Conceptual and Constitutional Challenge of Transnational Private Regulation. Journal of Law and Society 38:1–19.Google Scholar
Snyder, Francis. 1999. Economic Globalisation: Global Legal Pluralism and European Law. European Law Journal 5:334–74.Google Scholar
Tietje, Christian, and Nowrot, Karsten. 2006. Laying Conceptual Ghosts to Rest: The Rise of Philip C. Jessup's “Transnational Law” in the Regulatory Governance of the International Economic System. In Philip C. Jessup's Transnational Law Revisited—On the Occasion of the 50th Anniversary of its Publication, ed. Tietje, Christian, Brouder, Alan, and Nowrot, Karsten, 17–43. Halle‐Wittenberg: Martin‐Luther‐Universität. http://www.wirtschaftsrecht.uni‐halle.de/sites/default/files/altbestand/Heft50.pdf (accessed April 18, 2011).Google Scholar
UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). UNCITRAL Texts and Status. http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts.html (accessed May 16, 2011).Google Scholar
Urry, John. 2000. Mobile Sociology. British Journal of Sociology 51:185–203.Google Scholar
Von Daniels, Detlef. 2010. The Concept of Law from a Transnational Perspective. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Wai, Robert. 2008. The Interlegality of Transnational Private Law. Law and Contemporary Problems 71:107–27.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Trans. Ephraim Fischoff et al. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, Peer. 2002. Piercing the Legal Veil: Commercial Arbitration and Transnational Law. European Law Journal 8:400–32.Google Scholar