Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T20:32:37.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From the Special Issue Editors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Ideology is a difficult term to discipline. That is one of the things members of the Amherst Seminar learned when editing this collection during the last year. Our call for papers was our first concession to the difficulty of disciplining that term. The call for papers suggested ideology might be used to refer to (1) false consciousness associated with and produced by particular structures of domination; (2) systems of belief of a group or class; (3) coherent meanings encoded in social relations and institutions; (4) consciousness linked to material conditions; (5) contested areas of social life as opposed to those that are taken for granted; and (6) the processes by which meanings and ideas are produced. Not surprisingly, the call generated a broad range and a large number of responses.

Information

Type
Editorial
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 22 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Law and Ideology , 1988, pp. 629 - 636
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 The Law and Society Association

References

ABEL, Richard (1980). “Redirecting Social Studies of Law,” 14 Law & Society Review 805.Google Scholar
BAKHTIN, M.M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
BALBUS, Isaac D. (1977) “Commodity Form and Legal Form: An Essay on the ‘Relative Autonomy’ of the Law,” 11 Law & Society Review 571.Google Scholar
BELL, Daniel (1960) The End of Ideology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
BOURDIEU, Pierre (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRIGHAM, John (1984) Civil Liberties and American Democracy. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Inc.Google Scholar
COHEN, Stanley (1985) Visions of Social Control. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
COLLINS, Hugh (1982) Marxism and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
COVER, Robert (1986) “Violence and the Word,” 95 Yale Law Journal 1601.Google Scholar
DALTON, Clare (1985) “An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine,” 94 Yale Law Journal 997.Google Scholar
FOUCAULT, Michel (1977) Discipline and Punish. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
GABEL, Peter (1977) “Intention and Structure in Contractual Conditions: Outline of a Method of Critical Legal Theory,” 61 Minnesota Law Review 601.Google Scholar
GEERTZ, Clifford (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
GENOVESE, Eugene (1976) Roll, Jordan, Roll. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
GIDDENS, Anthony (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis, New York: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAY, Douglas (1975) “Property, Authority and the Criminal Law,” in Hay, Douglas, Linebaugh, Peter, Rule, John G., Thompson, E.P., and Winslow, Cal, eds., Albion's Fatal Tree. New York: Pantheon Books, 17.Google Scholar
HUNT, Alan (1985) “The Ideology of Law; Advances and Problems in Recent Applications of the Concept of Ideology to the Analysis of Law,” 19 Law & Society Review 11.Google Scholar
KENNEDY, Duncan (1976) “Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication,” 89 Harvard Law Review 1685.Google Scholar
LUKES, Steven (1974) Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MESSICK, Brinkley (1988) “Kissing Hands and Knees: Hegemony and Hierarchy in Shari'a Discourse,” 22 Law & Society Review 637.Google Scholar
MCBARNETT, Doreen (1984) “Law and Capital: The Role of Legal Form and Legal Actors,” 12 International Journal of the Sociology of Law 231.Google Scholar
ORTNER, Sherry B. (1984) “Theory in Anthropology Since the Sixties,” 26 Comparative Studies in Society and History 126.Google Scholar
PELLER, Gary (1985) “The Metaphysics of Law,” 73 California Law Review 1151.Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin (1985) “Legal Effectiveness and Social Studies of Law: On the Unfortunate Persistence of a Research Tradition,” IX Legal Studies Forum 23.Google Scholar
SILBEY, Susan S. (1985) “Ideals and Practices in the Study of Law,” IX Legal Studies Forum 7.Google Scholar
SUMNER, Colin (1979) Reading Ideologies. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
THOMPSON, E.P. (1975) Whigs and Hunters: The Origins of the Black Act. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
TRUBEK, David (1984) “Where the Action Is: Critical Legal Studies and Empiricism,” 36 Stanford Law Review 575.Google Scholar
UNGER, Roberto Mangabeira (1987) False Necessity: Anti-Necessitation Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy. Part I of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar