Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T15:23:14.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Labeling Process: Reinforcement and Deterrent?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Bernard A. Thorsell and
Lloyd W. Klemke
Bernard A. Thorsell
Affiliation:
San Fernando Valley State College
Lloyd W. Klemke
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The labeling theory approach to the analysis of deviance depicts stable patterns of deviant behavior as products or outcomes of the process of being apprehended in a deviant act and publicly branded as a deviant person. The involvement of an individual in this process is viewed as depending much less upon what he does or what he is than upon what others do to him as a consequence of his actions. Deviant persons are regarded as having undergone a degradation ceremony with the result that they have been relegated to membership in a deviant group. In the process, they are thought to have come to acquire an inferior social status and to have developed a deviant view of the world and all the knowledges, skills, and attitudes associated with that status.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , February 1972, pp. 393 - 403
Copyright
Copyright © 1972 The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

AUTHORS' NOTE: This is a revised version of a paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, Washington, D.C., August 31-September 3, 1970.

References

BECKER, Howard S. (1963) Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviances. London: Free Press.Google Scholar
CAMERON, Mary O. (1964) The Booster and the Snitch. London: Free Press.Google Scholar
EATON, Joseph, and Robert J., WEIL (1953) Culture and Mental Disorders. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
ERICKSON, Kai (1962) “The Sociology of Deviance,” 9 Social Problems 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KITSUSE, John (1962) “Societal Reaction to Deviant Behavior: Problems of Method and Theory,” 9 Social Problems 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KLEMKE, Lloyd W. (1971) “Higher Education Failures Coming to a Community College and Labeling Theory.” Presented at the 1971 Annual Meeting of the Pacific Sociological Association in Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
LEMERT, Edwin (1967) Human Deviance, Social Problems and Social Control. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
LEMERT, Edwin (1951) Social Pathology. New York: McGraw Hill Company.Google Scholar
PLAYFAIR, Giles, and Derrick, SINGTON (1957) The Offenders: Society and the Atrocious Crime. London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
ROETHLISBERGER, Fritz J., and William J., DICKSON (1939) Management and the Worker. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
ROSENTHAL, Robert, and Lenore F., JACOBSON (1968) “Teacher Expectations for the Disadvantaged,” 218 Scientific American 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHEFF, Thomas J. (1966) Being Mentally Ill: A Sociological Theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
SCHWARTZ, Richard D., and Jerome H., SKOLNICK (1962) “Two Studies of Legal Stigma,” 10 Social Problems 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TANNENBAUM, Frank (1938) Crime and the Community. Boston: Ginn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar