Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
2013.
2014.
Mohamadi, Hesam
2018.
An Acquittal for Epistemicism.
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 4,
p.
905.
Escher, Ana
2019.
Legal Interpretation and Scientific Knowledge.
p.
161.
Moroni, Stefano
Buitelaar, Edwin
Sorel, Niels
and
Cozzolino, Stefano
2020.
Simple Planning Rules for Complex Urban Problems: Toward Legal Certainty for Spatial Flexibility.
Journal of Planning Education and Research,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 3,
p.
320.
Lanius, David
2021.
What Is the Value of Vagueness?.
Theoria,
Vol. 87,
Issue. 3,
p.
752.
Lam, Barry
2022.
A Companion to Public Philosophy.
p.
249.
2023.
Trávníček, Zdeněk
2024.
Metaphysical Vagueness, Identity of Legal Cases, and the Rule of Law.
Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 2,
p.
44.
Bielska-Brodziak, Agnieszka
Drapalska-Grochowicz, Marlena
and
Suska, Marek
2024.
Petrified and Updated, or How the Interpretive Community Exercises Power Over the Meaning of Vague Terms in the Legal Text (on the Example of Polish Criminal Law).
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 7,
p.
2193.
Miklós, Szabó
2026.
A jogi nyelv sajátszerűsége.
Magyar Jogi Nyelv,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 2,
p.
1.
Punev, Anastas
2026.
VAGUENESS AS A TOOL FOR (NON-)ADJUDICATING: THE BULGARIAN EXAMPLE.
Pravni vjesnik,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 1,
p.
67.
de Vries, Max
2026.
Dangerously Vague: The Indeterminacy of Dangerousness Criteria of Preventive Sanctions in Dutch Criminal Law.
Behavioral Sciences & the Law,
