Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-jswmv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T09:17:57.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ANATOMIZING INCOMPLETE-MARKETS SMALL OPEN ECONOMIES: POLICY TRADE-OFFS AND EQUILIBRIUM DETERMINACY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Jaime Alonso-Carrera and
Timothy Kam
Jaime Alonso-Carrera
Affiliation:
Universidade de Vigo
Timothy Kam*
Affiliation:
The Australian National University
*
Address correspondence to: Timothy Kam, School of Economics, H.W. Arndt Building 25a, the Australian National University, A.C.T. 0200, Australia; e-mail: timothy.kam@anu.edu.au.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We propose a simple incomplete-markets small-open-economy model that is amenable to analytical dissection of its policy-relevant mechanisms. In contrast to its complete-markets limit, the equilibrium real exchange rate is irreducible from the incomplete-markets equilibrium. Market incompleteness exacerbates the domestic-inflation and output-gap monetary-policy trade-off in two ways: its steepness and its resulting endogenous cost-push to the trade-off. The latter depends on an equilibrium combination of structural shocks and on agents' beliefs of future events. Thus, in comparison to its complete-markets and closed-economy limits, standard Taylor-type rules are less capable of inducing determinate rational expectations equilibrium in our environment. Despite the larger policy trade-off under incomplete markets, simple policies that also respond to exchange-rate growth are able to manage expectations that drive the endogenous cost-push term. However, policies that respond directly to expectations may turn out to exacerbate the cost-push trade-off further, and thus, to be more likely to fuel self-fulfilling multiple or unstable equilibria.

Keywords

Incomplete MarketsMonetary Policy IsomorphismExchange RateEquilibrium Determinacy

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , June 2016, pp. 1022 - 1050
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

References

REFERENCES

Benigno, Gianluca and Benigno, Pierpaolo (2003) Price stability in open economies. Review of Economic Studies 70 (4), 743–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benigno, Gianluca and Thoenissen, Christoph (2008) Consumption and real exchange rates with incomplete markets and non-traded goods. Journal of International Money and Finance 27 (6), 926–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, Olivier and Kahn, Charles M., (1980) The solution of linear difference models under rational expectations. Econometrica 48, 1305–1311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullard, James and Mitra, Kaushik (2002) Learning about monetary policy rules. Journal of Monetary Economics 49, 1105–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chari, V.V., Patrick, J. Kehoe, and McGrattan, Ellen R. (2002) Can sticky price models generate volatile and persistent real exchange rates? Review of Economic Studies 69 (3), 533–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarida, Richard, Galí, Jordi, and Gertler, Mark (1999) The science of monetary policy: A New Keynesian perspective. Journal of Economic Literature 37 (4), 1661–1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarida, Richard, Galí, Jordi, and Gertler, Mark (2001) Optimal monetary policy in open versus closed economies: An integrated approach. AEA Papers and Proceedings 91 (2), 248–252.Google Scholar
de Paoli, Bianca (2009a) Monetary policy and welfare in a small open economy. Journal of International Economics 77 (1), 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Paoli, Bianca (2009b) Monetary policy under alternative asset market structures: The case of a small open economy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 41 (7), 1301–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrero, Andrea, Gertler, Mark, and Svensson, Lars E.O. (2010) Current account dynamics and monetary policy. In Galí, Jordi and Gertler, Mark (eds.), International Dimensions of Monetary Policy, National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report, pp. 199–244. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galí, Jordi and Monacelli, Tommaso (2005) Monetary policy and exchange rate volatility in a small open economy. Review of Economic Studies 72 (3), 707–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitemo, Kai and Söderström, Ulf (2008) Robust monetary policy in a small open economy. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 32 (10), 3218–3252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnemann, Ludger and Schabert, Andreas (2004) Net Foreign Assets, Interest Rate Policy, and Macroeconomic Stability. Technical report 54, Money Macro and Finance Research Group.Google Scholar
Llosa, Luis-Gonzalo and Tuesta, Vicente (2008) Determinacy and learnability of monetary policy rules in small open economies. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 40 (5), 1033–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubik, Thomas A. (2007) Non-stationarity and instability in small open-economy models even when they are “closed.” Economic Quarterly Fall, 393–412.Google Scholar
McCallum, Bennett T. and Nelson, Edward (1999) Nominal income targeting in an open-economy optimizing model. Journal of Monetary Economics 43, 553–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monacelli, Tommaso (2005) Monetary policy in a low pass-through environment. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 37 (6), 1047–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt-Grohé, Stephanie and Uribe, Martín (October 2003) Closing small open economy models. Journal of International Economics 61 (1), 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodford, Michael (2003) Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar