Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T10:08:41.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GROWTH WHEN ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS IS ENDOGENOUS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2018

Karine Constant and
Marion Davin
Karine Constant*
Affiliation:
Université Paris Est, ERUDITE
Marion Davin
Affiliation:
CEE-M, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, INRA, SupAgro
*
Address correspondence to: Karine Constant, Université Paris Est, Erudite, UPEC, 61 avenue du Général de Gaulle, Mail des Mèches, F-94010 Créteil, France; e-mail: karine.constant@u-pec.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This paper examines the relationship between environmental policy and growth when green preferences are endogenously determined by education and pollution. We consider an environmental policy in which the government implements a tax on pollution and recycles the revenue to fund pollution abatement activities and/or an education subsidy (influencing green behaviors). When the sensitivity of agents' environmental preferences to pollution and human capital is high, the economy can converge to a balanced growth path equilibrium with damped oscillations. We show that this environmental policy can both remove the oscillations, associated with intergenerational inequalities, and enhance the long-term growth rate. However, this solution requires that the revenue from the tax rate must be allocated to education and direct environmental protection simultaneously. We demonstrate that this type of mixed-instrument environment policy is an effective way to address environmental and economic issues in both the short and the long run.

Keywords

Environmental PolicyEndogenous GrowthEnvironmental AwarenessEducation

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , April 2019, pp. 1102 - 1136
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Footnotes

We would like to thank the editor and the two anonymous referees for their wise remarks. We are also grateful to Carine Nourry, Thomas Seegmuller, Mouez Fodha, Oded Galor, Natacha Raffin, Katheline Schubert, and Cees Withagen for their helpful comments and to the participants at the conferences OLG Days (2013, Clermont-Ferrand), LAGV (2013, Marseille), PET (2013, Lisbon), SURED (2014, Ascona), FAERE (2014, Montpellier), and of the seminar of UMR Economie Publique (2016, AgroParisTech – INRA). Supports from ANR GREEN-econ (ANR-16-CE03-0005) are acknowledged.

References

REFERENCES

Andreoni, J. (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving? Economic Journal 100 (401), 464–477.Google Scholar
Bednar-Friedl, B. (2012) Climate policy targets in emerging and industrialized economies: The inflence of technological differences, environmental preferences and propensity to save. Empirica 39, 191–215.Google Scholar
Blackburn, K. and Cipriani, G. P. (2002) A model of longevity, fertility and growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 26 (2), 187–204.Google Scholar
Blomquist, G. C. and Whitehead, J. C. (1998) Resource quality information and validity of willingness to pay in contingent valuation. Resource and Energy Economics 20, 179–196.Google Scholar
Brock, W. A. and Taylor, M. S. (2005) Economic growth and the environment: A review of theory and empirics. In Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. N. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1, 1st ed., pp. 1749–1821. North-Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Crumpler, H. and Grossman, P. (2008) An experimental test of warm glow giving. Journal of Public Economics 92 (5–6), 1011–1021.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R. and Scarce, R. (1991) Poll trends: Environmental problems and protection. Public Opinion Quarterly 55, 651–672.Google Scholar
European Commission (2005) On the Review of the Sustainable Development Strategy: A Platform for Action. COM 658 final.Google Scholar
European Commission (2008) The Attitudes of European Citizens towards the Environment. Eurobarometer 296, DG Environment.Google Scholar
Fodha, M. and Seegmuller, T. (2012) A note on environmental policy and public debt stabilization. Macroeconomic Dynamics 16 (3), 477–492.Google Scholar
Glomm, G. and Ravikumar, B. (1992) Public versus private investment in human capital: Endogenous growth and income inequality. Journal of Political Economy 100 (4), 818–833.Google Scholar
Gradus, R. and Smulders, S. (1993) The trade-off between environmental care and long-term growth: Pollution in three prototype growth models. Journal of Economics 58, 25–51.Google Scholar
Grimaud, A. and Tournemaine, F. (2007) Why can an environmental policy tax promote growth through the channel of education. Ecological Economics 62 (1), 27–36.Google Scholar
John, A. and Pecchenino, R. (1994) An overlapping generations model of growth and the environment. Economic Journal 104, 1393–1410.Google Scholar
Kotchen, M. and Moore, M. (2008) Conservation: From voluntary restraint to a voluntary price premium. Environmental and Resource Economics 40 (2), 195–215.Google Scholar
Mariani, F., Pérez-Barahona, A., and Raffin, N. (2010) Life expectancy and the environment. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34 (4), 798–815.Google Scholar
Menges, R., Schroeder, C., and Traub, S. (2005) Altruism, warm glow and the willingness-to-donate for green electricity: An artefactual field experiment. Environmental and Resource Economics 31 (4), 431–458.Google Scholar
OECD (2007) Instrument Mixes for Environmental Policy. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2008) Promoting Sustainable Consumption - Good Practices in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2010) Taxation, Innovation and the Environment. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Ono, T. (2003) Environmental tax policy in a model of growth cycles. Economic Theory 22, 141–168.Google Scholar
Palivos, T. and Varvarigos, D. (2017) Pollution abatement as a source of stabilization and long-run growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 21 (3), 644–676.Google Scholar
Pautrel, X. (2012) Environmental policy, education and growth: A reappraisal when lifetime is finite. Macroeconomic Dynamics 16 (5), 661–685.Google Scholar
Pautrel, X. (2015) Abatement technology and the environment-growth nexus with education. Environmental and Resource Economics 61 (3), 297–318.Google Scholar
Prieur, F. and Bréchet, T. (2013) Can education be good for both growth and the environment? Macroeconomic Dynamics 17 (5), 1135–1157.Google Scholar
Ribar, D. C. and Wilhelm, M. O. (2002) Altruistic and joy-of-giving motivations in charitable behavior. Journal of Political Economy 110 (2), 425–457.Google Scholar
Schumacher, I. (2009) The dynamics of environmentalism and the environment. Ecological Economics 68 (11), 2842–2849.Google Scholar
Schumacher, I. and Zou, B. (2015) Threshold preferences and the environment. Journal of Mathematical Economics 60, 17–27.Google Scholar
Scruggs, L. and Benegal, S. (2012) Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the great recession? Global Environmental Change 22 (2), 505–515.Google Scholar
Seegmuller, T. and Verchère, A. (2004) Pollution as a source of endogenous fluctuations and periodic welfare inequality in OLG economies. Economics Letters 84, 363–369.Google Scholar
Tjernström, E. and Tietenberg, T. (2008) Do differences in attitudes explain differences in national climate change policies? Ecological Economics 65, 315–324.Google Scholar
Varvarigos, D. (2011) Environmental dynamics and the links between growth, volatility and mortality. Bulletin of Economic Research 65 (4), 314–331.Google Scholar
Witzke, H. P. and Urfei, G. (2001) Willingness to pay for environmental protection in Germany: Coping with the regional dimension. Regional Studies 35 (3), 207–214.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) (2014) Living Planet Report 2014: Species and Spaces, People and Places. In McLellan, R., Iyengar, L., Jeffries, B. and Oerlemans, N. (eds.). Gland: Switzerland.Google Scholar
Xepapadeas, A. (2005) Economic growth and the environment. In Maler, K.-G. and Vincent, J. (eds.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, vol. 3, pp. 1219–1271. North-Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. (1999) Environmental sustainability, nonlinear dynamics, and chaos. Economic Theory 14, 489–500.Google Scholar