Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T11:45:16.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GLOBALIZATION AND THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2015

Pedro Cavalcanti Ferreira,
Samuel Pessôa and
Marcelo Rodrigues dos Santos
Pedro Cavalcanti Ferreira*
Affiliation:
FGV/EPGE—Escola Brasileira de Economia e Finanças
Samuel Pessôa
Affiliation:
Fundação Getulio Vargas
Marcelo Rodrigues dos Santos
Affiliation:
Insper
*
Address correspondence to: Pedro Cavalcanti Ferreira, FGV/EPGE—Escola Brasileira de Economia e Finanças, Praia de Botafogo 190, 1125, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22253-900, Brazil; e-mail: ferreira@fgv.br.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This paper argues that trade specialization played an indispensable role in supporting the Industrial Revolution. We calibrate a two-good and two-sector overlapping generations model for England's historical development and investigate how much different England's development path would have been if it had not globalized in 1840. The open-economy model is able to match the data closely, but the closed-economy model cannot explain the fall in the value of land relative to wages observed in the nineteenth century. Without globalization, the transition period in the British economy would have been considerably longer than that observed in the data and key variables, such as the share of labor force in agriculture, would have converged to figures very distant from the actual ones.

Keywords

Industrial RevolutionInternational TradeMalthusian Trap

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , April 2016, pp. 643 - 666
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

References

REFERENCES

Allen, R. (2000) Economic structure and agricultural productivity in Europe, 1300–1800. European Review of Economic History 3, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, R. (2009) The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Azarnert, L. V. (in press) Transportation costs and the Great Divergence. Macroeconomic Dynamics.Google Scholar
Boucekkine, R., de la Croix, D., and Licandro, O. (2003) Early mortality declines at the dawn of modern growth. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 105 (3), 401–418.Google Scholar
Clark, G. (1998) Microbes and Markets: Was the Black Death an Economic Revolution? Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Clark, G. (2002) The Agricultural Revolution? England, 1500–1912. Working paper, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Clark, G. (2007) A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, G., O'Rourke, K., and Taylor, A. (2009) Made in America? The New World, The Old, and the Industrial Revolution. NBER working paper 14077.Google Scholar
Crafts, N.F.R. and Harley, C.K. (2004) Precocious british industrialization: A general-equilibrium perspective. In de la Escosura, L.P. (ed.), Exceptionalism and Industrialization: Britain and Its European Rivals, 1688–1815, pp. 86–107. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Desmet, K. and Parente, S. (2012) The evolution of markets and the revolution of industry: A unified theory of growth. Journal of Economic Growth 17 (3), 205–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doepke, M. and Zilibotti, F. (2005) The macroeconomics of child labor regulation. American Economic Review 95, 1492–1524.Google Scholar
Duarte, M. and Restuccia, D. (2010) The role of the structural transformation in aggregate productivity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 (1), 129–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinstein, C. (1998) Pessimism perpetuated: Real wages and the standard of living in Britain during and after the Industrial Revolution. Journal of Economic History 58 (3), 625–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, R. and O'Rourke, K.H. (2007) Power and Plenty: Trade, War, and the World Economy in the Second Millennium. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Galor, O. and Weil, D. (2000) Population, technology, and growth: From Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. American Economic Review 90 (4), 806–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, G. and Prescott, E.C. (2002) From Malthus to Solow. American Economic Review 92 (4), 1205–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, C.K. (1993) Reassessing the Industrial Revolution: A macro view. In Mokyr, J. (ed.), The British Industrial Revolution: An Economic Perspective, pp. 171–226. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Harley, C.K. and Crafts, N.F.R. (1998) “Productivity of Growth during the First Industrial Revolution: Inferences from the Pattern of British External Trade. Economic history working paper 22396, Department of Economic History, London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Harley, C.K. and Crafts, N.F.R. (2000) Simulating the two views of the British Industrial Revolution. Journal of Economic History 60, 819–841.Google Scholar
Landes, D. (1969) The Unbound Prometheus. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. (2002) The industrial revolution: Past and future. In Lectures on Economic Growth, pp. 109–188. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. (1991) Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development: A Long-Run Comparative View. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matsuyama, K. (1992) Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage, and economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory 58, 317–334.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. (1981) The Industrial Revolution: A survey. In Flound, R.C. and McCloskey, D. (eds.), The Economic History of Britain Since 1700, Vol.1, pp. 103–127. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (1990) The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (2009) The Enlightened Economy: An Economic History of Britain 1700–1850. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ngai, R. (2004) Barriers and the transition to modern growth. Journal of Monetary Economics 51 (7), 1353–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D.C. and Weingast, B. (1989) Constitution and commitment: The evolution of institutional governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. Journal of Economic History 49 (4), 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Rourke, K. and Williamson, J. (2002) When did globalization begin? European Review of Economic History 6 (April), 23–50.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, K. and Willianson, J. (2005) From Malthus to Ohlin: Trade, industrialization and distribution since 1500. Journal of Economic Growth 10 (1), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeranz, K. (2000) The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stokey, N.L. (2001) A quantitative model of the British Industrial Revolution, 1780–1850. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 55, 55–109.Google Scholar
Strulik, H. (2010) A note on economic growth with subsistence consumption. Macroeconomic Dynamics 14 (5), 763–771.Google Scholar
Strulik, H. and Weisdorf, J. (2012) How child costs and survival shaped the Industrial Revolution and the demographic transition. Macroeconomic Dynamics 18 (1), 114–144.Google Scholar