Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T04:27:27.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GREEN SPENDING REFORMS, GROWTH, AND WELFARE WITH ENDOGENOUS SUBJECTIVE DISCOUNTING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2014

Eugenia Vella ,
Evangelos V. Dioikitopoulos  and
Sarantis Kalyvitis
Eugenia Vella
Affiliation:
European University Institute
Evangelos V. Dioikitopoulos*
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Sarantis Kalyvitis
Affiliation:
Athens University of Economics and Business
*
Address correspondence to: Evangelos V. Dioikitopoulos, Department of Economics and Finance, Brunel University, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK; e-mail: evangelos.dioikitopoulos@brunel.ac.uk.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This paper studies optimal fiscal policy, in the form of taxation and the allocation of tax revenues between infrastructure and environmental investment, in a general-equilibrium growth model with endogenous subjective discounting. A green spending reform, defined as a reallocation of government expenditures toward the environment, can procure a double dividend by raising growth and improving environmental conditions, although the environment does not impact the production technology. Also, endogenous Ramsey fiscal policy eliminates the possibility of an “environmental and economic poverty trap.” In contrast to the case of exogenous discounting, green spending reforms are the optimal response of the Ramsey government to a rise in the agents' environmental concerns.

Keywords

Endogenous Time PreferenceGrowthEnvironmental QualitySecond-Best Fiscal Policy

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 19 , Special Issue 6: Growth, Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy, and Financial Frictions , September 2015 , pp. 1240 - 1260
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron, Aghion, Philippe, Bursztyn, Leonardo, and Hemous, David (2012) The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review 102 (1), 131–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agénor, Pierre-Richard (2010) A theory of infrastructure-led development. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34, 932–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayong Le Kama, Alain and Schubert, Katheline (2007) A note on the consequences of an endogenous discounting depending on the environmental quality. Macroeconomic Dynamics 11, 272–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balestra, Carlotta and Dottori, Davide (2012) Aging society, health and the environment. Journal of Population Economics 25, 1045–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert J. (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy 98, 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Rosalind L. and Farmer, Roger E.A. (2000) Indeterminacy with non-separable utility. Journal of Economic Theory 93, 118–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldrin, Michele (1992) Dynamic externalities, multiple equilibria, and growth. Journal of Economic Theory 58, 198–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovenberg, A. Lans and de Mooij, Ruud A. (1997) Environmental tax reform and endogenous growth. Journal of Public Economics 63, 207–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovenberg, A. Lans and Smulders, Sjak A. (1996) Transitional impacts of environmental policy in an endogenous growth. International Economic Review 37 (4), 861–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Horag, Mark, Nelson C., and Sul, Donggyu (2008) Endogenous discounting, the world saving glut and the U.S. current account. Journal of International Economics 75, 30–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dioikitopoulos, Evangelos V. and Kalyvitis, Sarantis (2010) Endogenous time preference and public policy: Growth and fiscal implications. Macroeconomics Dynamics 14, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dioikitopoulos, Evangelos V. and Kalyvitis, Sarantis (in press) Optimal fiscal policy with endogenous time preference. Journal of Public Economic Theory. doi:10.1111/jpet.12110.Google Scholar
Dolmas, Jim (1996) Balanced-growth-consistent recursive utility. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 20, 657–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economides, George and Philippopoulos, Apostolis (2008) Growth enhancing policy is the means to sustain the environment. Review of Economic Dynamics 11, 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbasha, Elamin H. and Roe, Terry L. (1996) On endogenous growth: The implications of environmental externalities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31, 240–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enders, Zeno, Jung, Philip, and Müller, Gernot J. (2013) Has the euro changed the business cycle? European Economic Review 59, 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Larry G. (1987) A simple dynamic general equilibrium model. Journal of Economic Theory 41, 68–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulder, Lawrence H. (1995) Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader's guide. International Tax and Public Finance 2, 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Gene M. and Krueger, Alan B. (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haibara, Takumi (2009) Environmental funds, public abatement and welfare. Environmental and Resource Economics 44, 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Lars Peter and Singleton, Kenneth J. (1983) Stochastic consumption, risk aversion and the temporal behavior of asset returns. Journal of Political Economy 91, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzipanayotou, Panos, Lahiri, Sajal, and Michael, Michael S. (2003) Environmental policy reform in a small open economy with public and private abatement. In Marsiliani, L., Rauscher, M., and Withagen, C. (eds.), Environmental Policy in an International Perspective, pp. 247–264. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikefuji, Masako and Horii, Ryo (2007) Wealth heterogeneity and escape from the poverty–environment trap. Journal of Public Economic Theory 9 (6), 1041–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouvet, Pierre-André, Pestieau, Pierre, and Ponthière, Gregory (2010) Longevity and environmental quality in an OLG model. Journal of Economics 100, 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kijima, Masaaki, Nishide, Katsumasa, and Ohyama, Atsuyuki (2010) Economic models for the environmental Kuznets curve: A survey. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34, 1187–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligthart, Jenny E. and van der Ploeg, Frederick (1994) Pollution, the cost of public funds and endogenous growth. Economics Letters 46, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lines, Marji (2005) Intertemporal equilibrium dynamics with a pollution externality. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 56, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariani, Fabio, Pérez-Barahona, Agustín, and Raffin, Natasha (2010) Life expectancy and the environment. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34 (4), 798–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuyama, Kiminori (1991) Increasing returns, industrialization, and indeterminacy of equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 617–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, Qinglai (2006) Impatience and equilibrium indeterminacy. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 30, 2671–2692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obstfeld, Maurice (1990) Intertermporal dependence, impatience, and dynamics. Journal of Monetary Economics 26, 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palivos, Theodore, Wang, Ping, and Zhang, Jianbo (1997) On the existence of balanced growth equilibrium. International Economic Review 38 (1), 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pautrel, Xavier (2008) Reconsidering the impact of the environment on long-run growth when pollution influences health and agents have a finite-lifetime. Environmental and Resource Economics 40 (1), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pautrel, Xavier (2012) Pollution, private investment in healthcare, and environmental policy. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 114 (2), 334–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, Rafaela and Ruiz, Jesus (2007) Global and local indeterminacy and optimal environmental public policies in an economy with public abatement activities. Economic Modelling 24, 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittel, Karen (2002) Sustainability and Endogenous Growth. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Prieur, Fabien (2009) The environmental Kuznets curve in a world of irreversibility. Economic Theory 40, 57–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez Harrington, Donna Theresa J., Khanna, Madhu, and Zilberman, David (2005) Conservation capital and sustainable growth. Oxford Economic Papers 57, 336–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani (1996) Coordination failures and government policy: A model with applications to East Asia and Eastern Europe. Journal of International Economics 40, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt-Grohé, Stephanie and Uribe, Martin (2003) Closing small open economy models. Journal of International Economics 61, 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, Shouyong (1999) Fashion and wealth accumulation. Economic Theory 14, 439–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzawa, Hirofumi (1968) Time preference, the consumption function, and the optimum asset holdings. In Wolfe, J. N. (ed.), Value, Capital, and Growth: Papers in Honour of Sir John Hicks, pp. 485–504. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar
Valente, Simone (2005) Sustainable development, renewable resources and technological progress. Environmental and Resource Economics 30, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varvarigos, Dimitrios (2010a) On the Joint Dynamics of Pollution and Capital Accumulation. Department of Economics working paper 11/05, University of Leicester.Google Scholar
Varvarigos, Dimitrios (2010b) Environmental degradation, longevity, and the dynamics of economic development. Environment and Resource Economics 46, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip, Huber, Joel, and Bell, Jason (2008) Estimating discount rates for environmental quality from utility-based choice experiments. Journal of Risk Uncertainty 37 (2), 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xepapadeas, Anastasios (2005) Economic growth and the environment. In Mäler, K.-G. and Vincent, J. (eds.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, pp. 1219–1271. Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy (2010) Environmental Performance Index. [Data available online at http://epi.yale.edu].Google Scholar
Yanase, Akihiko (2011) Impatience, pollution and indeterminacy. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35, 1789–1799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar