Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T11:39:44.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GROWTH AND KEEPING UP WITH THE JONESES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2010

Ronald Wendner
Ronald Wendner*
Affiliation:
University of Graz
*
Address correspondence to: Ronald Wendner, Department of Economics, University of Graz, Universitaetsstrasse 15, RESOWI-F4, A-8010 Graz, Austria; e-mail: ronald.wendner@uni-graz.at; URL: http://www.uni-graz.at/ronald.wendner.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This paper investigates the impact of the desire to keep up with the Joneses (KUJ) on economic growth and optimal tax policy in a continuous-time, overlapping-generations model with AK technology and exogenous, gradual retirement. Due to the desire to KUJ, the propensity to consume out of total wealth rises (declines), and the balanced growth rate declines (increases), when the households' individual total (physical and human) wealth is increasing (decreasing) with age. The rate of retirement determines whether or not a household's total wealth is increasing with age. If total wealth is increasing (decreasing) with age, an optimal allocation is decentralized by an intergenerationally progressive (regressive) lump-sum tax system. The desire to KUJ strengthens the intergenerational regressivity (progressivity) of the optimal tax system. The optimal tax implications of the desire to KUJ are a key finding of this paper.

Keywords

Keeping Up with the JonesesAK GrowthOverlapping GenerationsGradual RetirementOptimal Taxation

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 14 , Supplement S2: Public Policy, Externalities, and Economic Growth , November 2010, pp. 176 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

References

REFERENCES

Abel, A. B. (2005) Optimal taxation when consumers have endogenous benchmark levels of consumption. Review of Economic Studies 72, 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F., and Johansson-Stenman, O. (2005) How much do we care about absolute versus relative income and consumption? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 56, 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez-Cuadrado, F., Monteiro, G., and Turnovsky, S. (2004) Habit formation, catching up with the Joneses, and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth 9, 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronsson, T. and Johansson-Stenman, O. (in press) Positional concerns in an OLG model: Optimal labor and capital income taxation. International Economic Review.Google Scholar
Beaudry, P. and van Wincoop, E. (1996) The intertemporal elasticity of substitution: An exploration using a panel of state data. Economica 63, 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O. (1985) Debt, deficits, and finite horizons. Journal of Political Economy 93, 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucekkine, R., de la Croix, D., and Licandro, O. (2002) Vintage human capital, demographic trends, and endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Theory 104, 340–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brekke, K. A. and Howarth, R. B. (2002) Status, Growth and the Environment. Goods as Symbols in Applied Welfare Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Calvo, G.A. and Obstfeld, M. (1988) Optimal time-consistent fiscal policy with finite lifetimes. Econometrica 56, 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, F., Johansson-Stenman, O., and Martinsson, P. (2003) Do you enjoy having more than others? Survey evidence of positional goods. Economica 74, 586–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, C. D., Overland, J., and Weil, D. N. (1997) Comparison utility in a growth model. Journal of Economic Growth 2, 339–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corneo, G. G. and Jeanne, O. (1997) On relative wealth effects and the optimality of growth. Economics Letters 54, 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupor, B. and Liu, W.-F. (2003) Jealousy and equilibrium overconsumption. American Economic Review 93, 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erosa, A. and Gervais, M. (2002) Optimal taxation in life-cycle economies. Journal of Economic Theory 105, 338–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005) Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics 89, 997–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, W. H. and Heijdra, B. J. (2009) Keeping up with the ageing Joneses. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 33, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, W. H. and Hof, F. X. (2000) Relative consumption, economic growth, and taxation. Journal of Economics 72, 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, S. J. and Shiller, R. J. (1981) The determinants of the variability of stock market prices. American Economic Review 71, 222–227.Google Scholar
Groth, C. and Smulders, S. (2008) Robustness Problems in Endogenous Growth Theory. Working paper, Economics Department, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Heijdra, B. J. and Romp, W. E. (2009) Retirement, pensions, and ageing. Journal of Public Economics 93, 586–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson-Stenman, O., Carlsson, F., and Daruvala, D. (2002) Measuring future grandparents' preferences for equality and relative standing. Economic Journal 112, 362–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson-Stenman, O. and Martinsson, P. (2006) Honestly, why are you driving a BMW? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 60, 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, W.-F. and Turnovsky, S. (2005) Consumption externalities, production externalities, and long-run macroeconomic efficiency. Journal of Public Economics 89, 1097–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005) Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120, 963–1002.Google Scholar
Mankiw, G. N. (1981) The permanent income hypothesis and the real interest rate. Economics Letters 7, 307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankiw, G. N. (1985) Consumer durables and the real interest rate. Review of Economics and Statistics 67, 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, M. (2001) Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 45, 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumark, D. and Postlewaite, A. (1998) Relative income concerns and the rise in married women's employment. Journal of Public Economics 70, 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, M. (1997) Conspicuous consumption, economic growth, and taxation. Journal of Economics 66, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solnick, S. J. and Hemenway, D. (1998) Is more always better? A survey on positional concerns. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 37, 373–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solnick, S. J. and Hemenway, D. (2005) Are positional concerns stronger in some domains than in others? American Economic Review 95, 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnovsky, S. and Monteiro, G. (2007) Consumption externalities, production externalities, and efficient capital accumulation under time non-separable preferences. European Economic Review 51, 479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, W. E. (1970) The effects of interest rate changes on aggregate consumption. American Economic Review 60, 591–600.Google Scholar
Weber, W. E. (1975) Interest rates, inflation, and consumer expenditures. American Economic Review 65, 843–858.Google Scholar
Wendner, R. (2009) Conspicuous Consumption and Overlapping Generations. Research memorandum 0901, Economics Department, University of Graz.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendner, R. and Goulder, L. H. (2008) Status effects, the excess burden, and optimal levels of public goods provision. Journal of Public Economics 92, 1968–1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willenbockel, D. (2008) Social time preference revisited. Journal of Population Economics 21, 609–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar