Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T12:45:21.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HABIT FORMATION, DYNASTIC ALTRUISM, AND POPULATION DYNAMICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2010

Andreas Schäfer  and
Simone Valente
Andreas Schäfer
Affiliation:
University of Leipzig
Simone Valente*
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich
*
Address correspondence to: Dr. Simone Valente, CER-ETH, ZUE F-13, Zürichbergstrasse 18, CH-8032 Zürich, Switzerland; e-mail: svalente@ethz.ch.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We study the general equilibrium properties of two growth models with overlapping generations, habit formation, and endogenous fertility. In the neoclassical model, habits modify the economy's growth rate and generate transitional dynamics in fertility; stationary income per capita is associated with either increasing or decreasing population and output, depending on the strength of habits. In the AK specification, growing population and increasing consumption per capita require that the habit coefficient lie within definite boundaries; outside the critical interval, positive growth is associated with either declining consumption due to overcrowding, or extinction paths with declining population. In both frameworks, habits reduce fertility: the trade-off between second-period consumption and spending for bequests prompts agents to decrease fertility in order to make parental altruism less costly. This mechanism suggests that status-dependent preferences may explain part of the decline in fertility rates observed in most developed economies.

Keywords

Economic GrowthEndogenous FertilityHabit FormationIntergenerational Altruism

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , June 2011 , pp. 365 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

References

REFERENCES

Abel, Andrew B. (2005) Optimal taxation when consumers have endogenous benchmark levels of consumption. Review of Economic Studies 75, 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Carrera, Jaime, Caballè, Jordi, and Raurich, Xavier (2007) Aspirations, habit formation, and bequest motive. Economic Journal 117, 813–836.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Cuadrado, Francisco (2008) Growth outside the stable path: Lessons from the European reconstruction. European Economic Review 52, 568–588.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Cuadrado, Francisco, Monteiro, Goncalo, and Turnovsky, Stephen J. (2004) Habit formation, catching-up with the Joneses, and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth 9, 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1991) A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Keith and Cipriani, Giam Pietro (2005) Intergenerational transfers and demographic transition. Journal of Development Economics 78, 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldrin, Michele and Jones, Larry E. (2002) Mortality, fertility, and saving in a Malthusian economy. Review of Economic Dynamics 5, 775–814.Google Scholar
Caldwell, John C. (1982) Theory of Fertility Decline. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Christopher D. (2000) Risky habits and the marginal propensity to consume out of permanent income. International Economic Journal 14, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Christopher D., Overland, Jody R., and Weil, David N. (1997) Comparison utility in a growth model. Journal of Economic Growth 2, 339–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Croix, David and Michel, Philippe (1999) Optimal growth when tastes are inherited. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 23, 519–537.Google Scholar
de la Croix, David and Michel, Philippe (2002) A Theory of Economic Growth—Dynamics and Policy in Overlapping Generations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Peter A. (1965) National debt in a neoclassical growth model. American Economic Review 55, 1126–1150.Google Scholar
Doepke, Matthias (2005) Child mortality and fertility decline: Does the Barro–Becker model fit the facts? Journal of Population Economics 18, 337–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doepke, Matthias and Zilibotti, Fabrizio (2005) The macroeconomics of child labor regulation. American Economic Review 95, 1492–1524.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Isaac and Lui, Francis T. (1991) Intergenerational trade, longevity, and economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 99, 102–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrer, Jeffrey C. (2000) Habit formation in consumption and its implications for monetary-policy models. American Economic Review 90, 367–390.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, Jeffrey C. and Klein, Michael W. (1998) Risky Habits: On Risk Sharing, Habit Formation, and the Interpretation of International Consumption Correlations. NBER Working paper No. W6735.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded (2005) From stagnation to growth: Unified growth theory. In Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven N. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, pp. 171–293. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded and Moav, Omer (2002) Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 1133–1191.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded and Weil, David N. (1996) The gender gap, fertility, and growth. American Economic Review 86, 374–387.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded and Weil, David N. (2000) Population, technology, and growth: From Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. American Economic Review 90, 806–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guariglia, Alessandra and Rossi, Mariacristina (2002) Consumption, habit formation, and precautionary saving: Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. Oxford Economic Papers 54, 1–19.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R. (1992) Occupation and social class during fertility decline: Historical perspectives. In Gillis, John R., Tilly, Louise A., and Levine, Davide (eds.), The European Experience of Declining Fertility, 1850–1970: The Quiet Revolution, pp. 195–226. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heer, Burkhard and Maussner, Alfred (2005) Dynamic General Equilibrium Modelling—Computational Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. Ryan (1987) Status anxiety and demographic contraction of privileged populations. Population and Development Review 13, 439–470.Google Scholar
Kohler, Hans P., Billari, Francesco C., and Ortega, Josè A. (2002) The emergence of lowest-low-fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review 28, 641–688.Google Scholar
Lagerlöf, Nils Petter (2006) The Galor–Weil model revisited: A quantitative exercise. Review of Economic Dynamics 9, 116–142.Google Scholar
Mateos-Planas, Xavier (2002) The demographic transition in Europe: A neoclassical dynastic approach. Review of Economic Dynamics 5, 646–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulligan, Casey B. (1997) Parental Priorities and Economic Inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nishimura, Kazuo and Zhang, Junsen (1995) Sustainable plans of social security with endogenous fertility. Oxford Economic Papers 47, 182–194.Google Scholar
Osborn, Denise R. (1988) Seasonality and habit persistence in a life cycle model of consumption. Journal of Applied Econometrics 3, 255–266.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul M. (1989) Capital accumulation in the theory of long-run growth. In Barro, Robert J. (ed.) Modern Business Cycle Theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ryder, Harl E. and Heal, Geoffrey M. (1973) Optimal growth with intertemporally dependent preferences. Review of Economic Studies 40, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sah, Raaj K. (1991) The effects of child mortality changes on fertility choice and parental welfare. Journal of Political Economy 99, 582–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strulik, Holger and Brunner, Martin (2002) Solution of perfect foresight saddlepoint problems: A simple method and applications. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 26, 737–753.Google Scholar
Thibault, Emmanuel (2000) Existence of equilibrium in an OLG model with production and altruistic preferences. Economic Theory 15, 709–715.Google Scholar