Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T10:08:20.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INDETERMINACY AND PERIOD LENGTH UNDER BALANCED BUDGET RULES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2012

Alexis Anagnostopoulos
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Stony Brook
Chryssi Giannitsarou*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge and CEPR
*
Address correspondence to: Chryssi Giannitsarou, Faculty of Economics, Austin Robinson Building, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DD, UK; e-mail: cg349@cam.ac.uk.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We analyze the importance of the frequency of decision making for macroeconomic dynamics, in the context of a simple, well-known business cycle model with balanced budget rules. We explain how the frequency of decision making (period length) and the measurement unit of time (calibration frequency) differ and examine how local stability is affected by changes in the period length. We find that as the period grows longer, indeterminacy occurs less often. This may have significant quantitative implications: for the model at hand, there is a wide range of economically relevant labor tax rates (from 30% to 38%) for which the continuous-time model gives indeterminacy, whereas the discrete-time model has determinate dynamics.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012