Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T19:25:34.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NOTE ON THE RELATION BETWEEN SEARCH COSTS AND SEARCH DURATION FOR NEW HIRES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2020

Francesco Carbonero and
Hermann Gartner
Francesco Carbonero
Affiliation:
Universita di Torino
Hermann Gartner*
Affiliation:
Institute for Employment Research (IAB) and Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
*
Address correspondence to: Hermann Gartner, Institute for Employment Research, Regensburger Strasse 104, 90478 Nuremberg, Germany. e-mail: hermann.gartner@iab.de.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Fixed search costs, that is, costs that do not vary with search duration, can amplify the cyclical volatility of the labor market. To assess the size of fixed costs, we analyze the relation between search costs and search duration using German establishment data. An instrumental variable estimation shows no relation between search duration and search costs. We conclude that search costs are mainly fixed costs. Furthermore, we show that a search and matching model, calibrated for Germany with fixed costs close to 75%, can generate labor market volatility that is consistent with the data.

Keywords

Search CostsSearch DurationUnemployment Volatility Puzzle

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , January 2022, pp. 263 - 276
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Footnotes

We are grateful to Anja Bauer, Christian Merkl, Christian Offermanns, Enzo Weber, Jeffrey Wooldridge, and Josef Zweimuller for their valuable suggestions and discussion. We would also like to thank the participants of the IAB PhD Workshop 2017, the FAU-IAB Seminar on Macroeconomics and Labor Markets, and the Annual Congress of the German Economic Association 2017 for useful comments. We are grateful to the IAB team that conducts the Vacancy Survey for the support and the opportunity to introduce questions on search costs. The survey data used are confidential but not exclusive. Access to the data is provided by the Research Data Centre of the German Federal Employment Agency. For details, see http://fdz.iab.de/en/FDZ_Establishment_Data/IAB_Job_Vacancy_Survey.aspx.

References

REFERENCES

Barron, J. M., Berger, M. C. and Black, D. A. (1997) Employer search, training, and vacancy duration. Economic Inquiry 35(1), 167–192.10.1111/j.1465-7295.1997.tb01902.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenčič, V. and Norris, J. B. (2009) Employers’ online search: An empirical analysis. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 48(4), 684–709.10.1111/j.1468-232X.2009.00581.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo-Tudela, C., Launov, A., and Robin, J.-M. (2018) The Fall in German Unemployment: A Flow Analysis. IZA Discussion Papers 11442, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. R., Faberman, J. and Haltiwanger, J. C. (2013) The establishment-level behavior of vacancies and hiring. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 128(2), 581–622.10.1093/qje/qjt002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolfin, S. (2006) An examination of firms’ employment costs. Applied Economics 38(8), 861–878.10.1080/00036840600597576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, S. and Ramey, G. (2007) Job matching and propagation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31(11), 3671–3698.10.1016/j.jedc.2006.12.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, S. and Ramey, G. (2012) Exogenous versus endogenous separation. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 4(4), 68–93.Google Scholar
Gartner, H., Merkl, C. and Rothe, T. (2009) They Are Even Larger! More (on) Puzzling Labor Market Volatilities. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, H., Merkl, C. and Rothe, T. (2012) Sclerosis and large volatilities: Two sides of the same coin. Economics Letters 117(1), 106–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlbrecher, B., Merkl, C. and Nordmeier, D. (2016) Revisiting the matching function. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 69, 350–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moczall, A., Müller, A., Rebien, M., and Vogler-Ludwig, K. (2015) The IAB Job Vacancy Survey. Establishment Survey On Job Vacancies and Recruitment Processes. FDZ-Datenreport 04/2015, FDZ, Nürnberg.Google Scholar
Mühlemann, S. and Pfeifer, H. (2016) The structure of hiring costs in Germany: Evidence from firm-level data. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 55(2), 193–218.10.1111/irel.12139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrongolo, B. and Pissarides, C. A. (2001) Looking into the black box: A survey of the matching function. Journal of Economic Literature 39(2), 390–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pissarides, C. (2009) The unemployment volatility puzzle: Is wage stickiness the answer? Econometrica 77(5), 1339–1369.Google Scholar
Rahn, D. and Weber, E. (2019) Patterns of unemployment dynamics in Germany. Macroeconomic Dynamics 23(1), 322–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shao, E. and Silos, P. (2013) Entry costs and labor market dynamics. European Economic Review 63(C), 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimer, R. (2005) The cyclical behavior of equilibrium unemployment and vacancies. American Economic Review 95(1), 25–49.10.1257/0002828053828572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, J. I. and Toledo, M. (2009) Labor turnover costs and the cyclical behavior Of vacancies and unemployment. Macroeconomic Dynamics 13(S1), 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, J. I. and Toledo, M. (2013) The unemployment volatility puzzle: The role Of matching costs revisited. Economic Inquiry 51(1), 836–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Carbonero and Gartner Supplementary Materials

Carbonero and Gartner Supplementary Materials

Download Carbonero and Gartner Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 61.9 KB