Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T17:46:05.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NOTE ON THE SLOPE OF THE AGGREGATE DEMAND CURVE AT THE ZERO LOWER BOUND

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2020

Yangyang Ji and
Wei Xiao
Yangyang Ji*
Affiliation:
Central University of Finance and Economics
Wei Xiao
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Binghamton
*
Address correspondence to: Yangyang Ji, China Economics and Management Academy, Central University of Finance and Economics, No. 39, South College Road, Haidian District, 100081 Beijing, China. e-mail: yji3@binghamton.edu.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This paper analyzes a regime-switching New Keynesian model to understand what happens to the aggregate economy when the nominal interest rate hits the zero lower bound (ZLB). Contrary to the literature, our model predicts that the aggregate demand curve is not always upward sloping when the ZLB binds. Instead, it depends on expectations. If the expected duration of the ZLB is short but consistent with expectations surveys, the AD curve can be downward sloping. In that case, the fiscal multiplier is moderate and supply-side reforms are expansionary. These results complement existing findings in the literature.

Keywords

New Keynesian ModelZero Lower BoundFiscal MultipliersSupply-Side Reforms

Information

Type
Notes
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , June 2022, pp. 1107 - 1126
Copyright
© 2020 Cambridge University Press

References

Bauer, M. D. and Rudebusch, G. D. (2013) Monetary Policy Expectations at the Zero Lower Bound. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2013-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, J., Schmitt-Grohé, S. and Uribe, M. (2001) Monetary policy and multiple equilibria. American Economic Review 91(1), 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, J., Schmitt-Grohé, S. and Uribe, M. (2002) The perils of Taylor rules. Journal of Economic Theory 96, 40–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boneva, L. M., Anton Braun, R. and Waki, Y. (2016) Some unpleasant properties of log-linearized solutions when the nominal rate is zero. Journal of Monetary Economics 84, 216–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstrom, C., Fuerst, T. and Paustian, M. (2014) Fiscal multipliers under an interest rate peg of deterministic versus stochastic duration. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 76, 1293–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M. and Rebelo, S. (2011) When is the government spending multiplier large? Journal of Political Economy 119, 78–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Setton, J., Hausman, J. K. and Wieland, J. F. (2017) Supply-side policies in the depression: Evidence from France. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 49, 273–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggertsson, G. B. (2001a) Real Government Spending in a Liquidity Trap. Photocopy, Princeton University. http://www.ny.frb.org/research/economists/eggertsson/papers.html.Google Scholar
Eggertsson, G. B. (2011b) What fiscal policy is effective at zero interest rates? NBER Macroeconomics Annual 25, 59–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggertsson, G. B. (2012) Was the new deal contractionary? American Economic Review 102, 524–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggertsson, G. B., Ferrero, A. and Raffo, A. (2014) Can structural reforms help Europe? Journal of Monetary Economics 61, 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggertsson, G. B. and Singh, S. R. (2019) Log-linear approximation versus an exact solution at the ZLB in the New Keynesian model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Controls 105, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggertsson, G. B. and Woodford, M. (2003) Optimal Monetary Policy in a Liquidity Trap. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper: No. w9968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Villaverde, J. (2014) Discussion can structural reforms help Europe? Journal of Monetary Economics 61, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Villaverde, J., Gordon, G., Guerrón-Quintana, P. and Rubio-Ramírez, J. F. (2015) Nonlinear adventures at the zero lower bound. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 57, 182–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galí, J. (2015) Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycle: An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework and Its Applications, 2nd ed., vol. 1, number 10495. Economics Books, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Garín, J., Lester, R. and Sims, E. (2019) Are supply shocks contractionary at the ZLB? Evidence from utilization-adjusted TFP data. Review of Economics and Statistics 101, 160–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulish, M., Morley, J. and Robinson, T. (2017) Estimating DSGE models with zero interest rate policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 88, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, K. R. S. M. and Ravn, M. O. (2014) Fiscal policy in an expectations-driven liquidity trap. Review of Economic Studies 81, 1637–1667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt-Grohé, S. and Uribe, M. (2001) On the perils of Taylor rules,” Journal of Economic Theory 96(1), 40–69.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Grohé, S. and Uribe, M. (2017) Liquidity traps and jobless recoveries. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 9(1), 165–204.Google Scholar
Swanson, E. T. and Williams, J. C. (2014) Measuring the effect of the zero lower bound on medium- and longer-term interest rates. American Economic Review 104(10), 3154–3185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieland, J. F. (2019) Are negative supply shocks expansionary at the zero lower bound? Journal of Political Economy 127, 973–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodford, M. (2011) Simple analytics of the government expenditure multiplier. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 3, 1–35.Google Scholar