Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T00:33:09.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND EXTERNALITIES IN U.S. MANUFACTURING: EVIDENCE FROM THE PRICE-AUGMENTING AIM COST FUNCTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2012

Guohua Feng and
Apostolos Serletis
Guohua Feng
Affiliation:
University of North Texas
Apostolos Serletis*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
*
Address correspondence to: Apostolos Serletis, Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada; e-mail: Serletis@ucalgary.ca.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In this paper, we propose a price-augmenting asymptotically ideal model (AIM) cost function to investigate the effects of public infrastructure on the performance of the U.S. manufacturing industry, using KLEMS data over the period from 1953 to 2001. In doing so, we make a distinction between the productivity effect and the production factor effect of public infrastructure. This distinction allows us to focus on the more interesting productivity effect by incorporating public infrastructure into the AIM cost function through the efficiency index. Moreover, we specify the growth rate of the efficiency index as a Box–Cox function of public infrastructure and a time trend, a proxy for other technology. The excellent flexibility of our price-augmenting AIM cost function offers many insights regarding the effects of infrastructure on the U.S. manufacturing sector.

Keywords

Flexible Functional FormsAsymptotically Ideal ModelNonlinear Cost FunctionEfficiency IndexPublic Infrastructure

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 17 , Issue 7 , October 2013, pp. 1367 - 1410
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

References

REFERENCES

Aschauer, D. (1989) Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics 23, 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, C.L. (1990) Marginal efficiency cost calculations: Differential analysis vs. balanced budget analysis. Journal of Public Economics 41, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, W.A., Geweke, J., and Wolfe, M. (1991) Semi-nonparametric Bayesian estimation of the asymptotically ideal production model. Journal of Econometrics 49, 5–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, W.A. and Serletis, A. (2008) Consumer preferences and demand systems. Journal of Econometrics 147, 210–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berndt, E. and Hansson, B. (1992) Measuring the contribution of public infrastructure in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, E.K. (1987) On the marginal welfare cost of taxation. American Economic Review 77, 11–23.Google Scholar
Bureau of Economic Analysis (June 1999) Note on Rates of Return for Domestic Nonfinancial Corporations, 1960–98. Survey of Current Business (http://www.bea.gov/scb/account_articles/national/0699cba/maintext.htm).Google Scholar
Burguete, J.F., Gallant, A.R., and Souza, G. (1982) On unification of the asymptotic theory of nonlinear econometric models. Econometric Reviews 1, 151–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caves, D. and Christensen, L.R. (1980) Global properties of flexible functional forms. American Economic Review 70, 422–432.Google Scholar
Caves, D.W., Christensen, L.R., and Diewert, W.E. (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica 50, 1393–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, L., Jorgenson, D.W., and Lau, L.J. (1975) Transcendental logarithmic utility functions. American Economic Review 65, 367–364.Google Scholar
Diewert, W.E. (1971) An application of the Shephard duality theorem: A generalized Leontief production function. Journal of Political Economy 79, 481–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diewert, W.E. and Fox, K.J. (2008) On the estimation of returns to scale, technical progress and monopolistic markups. Journal of Econometrics 145, 174–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diewert, W.E. and Wales, T.J. (1987) Flexible functional forms and global curvature conditions. Econometrica 55, 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diewert, W.E. and Wales, T.J. (1992) Quadratic spline models for producer's supply and demand functions. International Economic Review 33, 705–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duggal, V.G., Saltzman, C., and Klein, L.R. (1999) Infrastructure and productivity: A nonlinear approach. Journal of Econometrics 92, 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duggal, V.G., Saltzman, C., and Klein, L.R. (2007) Infrastructure and productivity: An extension to private infrastructure and its productivity. Journal of Econometrics 140, 485–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, W. and Rebelo, S. (1993) Fiscal policy and economic growth: An empirical investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics 32, 417–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, P. and Karras, G. (1994) Are government activities productive? Evidence from a panel of U.S. states. Review of Economics and Statistics 76, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, G. and Serletis, A. (2008) Productivity trends in U.S. manufacturing: Evidence from the NQ and AIM cost functions. Journal of Econometrics 142, 281–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, G. and Serletis, A. (2009) Efficiency and productivity of the US banking industry, 1998–2005: Evidence from the Fourier frontier function satisfying global regularity condition. Journal of Applied Econometrics 24, 105–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, J.G. (1999) Roads to prosperity? Assessing the link between public capital and productivity. American Economic Review 89, 619–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallant, A.R. (1975) Seemingly unrelated nonlinear regressions. Journal of Econometrics 3, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallant, A.R. (1982) Unbiased determination of production technology. Journal of Econometrics 20, 285–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallant, A.R. and Golub, G. (1984) Imposing curvature restrictions on flexible functional forms. Journal of Econometrics 26, 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramlich, E.M. (1994) Infrastructure investment: A review essay. Journal of Economic Literature 32, 1176–1196.Google Scholar
Guilkey, D., Lovell, C., and Sickles, R. (1983) A comparison of the performance of three flexible functional forms. International Economic Review 24, 591–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimzade, N. and Myles, G. (2010) Growth and public infrastructure. Macroeconomic Dynamics 14, 258–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtz-Eakin, D. (1994) Public-sector capital and the productivity puzzle. Review of Economics and Statistics 76, 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulten, C.R. and Schwab, R.M. (1991) Public capital formation and the growth of regional manufacturing industries. National Tax Journal 44, 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, B. (2009) The Marginal Cost of Public Funds and Optimal Second-Best Policy Rules. Mimeo, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. (1996) Investment: Tax Policy and the Cost of Capital. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. and Yun, K. (1990) Tax reform and U.S. economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 88, 151–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaizuka, K. (1965) Public goods and decentralization of production. Review of Economics and Statistics 47, 118–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmerling, A. and Stephan, A. (2002) The contribution of local public infrastructure to private productivity and its political economy: Evidence from a panel of large German cities. Public Choice 113, 403–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleven, H. and Kreiner, C. (2003) The Marginal Cost of Public Funds in OECD Countries. Hours of Work Versus Labor Force Participation. CESifo Working Paper 935.Google Scholar
Kohli, U. (1990) Growth accounting in the open economy: Parametric and nonparametric estimates. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 16, 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, L.J. (1978) Testing and imposing monotonicity, convexity, and quasi-convexity constraints. In Fuss, M. and McFadden, D. (eds.), Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, vol. 1, pp. 409–453. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Liebowitz, S.J. and Margolis, S.E. (1994) Network externality: An uncommon tragedy. Journal of Economic Perspective 8, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R.E. Jr. (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, J.E. (1952) External economies and diseconomies in a competitive situation. Economic Journal 62, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morey, E.R. (1986) An introduction to checking, testing, and imposing curvature properties: The true function and the estimated function. Canadian Journal of Economics 19, 207–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, C.J. and Schwartz, A.E. (1996) State infrastructure and productive performance. American Economic Review 86, 1095–1111.Google Scholar
Morrison, C.J. and Siegel, D.S. (1999) Scale economies and industry agglomeration externalities: A dynamic cost function approach. American Economic Review 89, 272–290.Google Scholar
Munnell, A.H. (1990) How does public infrastructure affect regional economic performance? New England Economic Review (September/October), 11–32.Google Scholar
Munnell, A.H. (1992) Policy watch: Infrastructure investment and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadiri, M.I. and Mamuneas, T.P. (1994) The effects of public infrastructure and R&D capital on the cost structure and performance of U.S. manufacturing industries. Review of Economics and Statistics 76, 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadiri, M.I. and Mamuneas, T.P. (1998) Contribution of Highway Capital to Output and Productivity Growth in the U.S. Economy and Industries. Working Paper, U.S. Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
Romer, P. (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94, 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romp, W. and de Haan, J. (2007) Public capital and economic growth: A critical survey. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 8, 6–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. (1954) The theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics 36, 386–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serletis, A. and Feng, G. (2010) Semi-nonparametric estimates of currency substitution between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar. Macroeconomic Dynamics 14, 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serletis, A. and Shahmoradi, A. (2005) Semi-nonparametric estimates of the demand for money in the United States. Macroeconomic Dynamics 9, 542–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serletis, A. and Shahmoradi, A. (2008) Note on finite approximations of the asymptotically Ideal model. Macroeconomic Dynamics 12, 579–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturm, J.E. and de Haan, J. (1995) Is public expenditure really productive? Economic Modelling 12, 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturm, J.E., Kuper, G.H., and de Haan, J. (1998) Modelling government investment and economic growth on a macro level: A review. In Brakman, S., Vanes, H., and Kuipers, S.K. (eds.), Market Behaviour and Macroeconomic Modelling, pp. 359–406. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatom, J.A. (1991) Public capital and private sector performance. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 73, 3–15.Google Scholar
Thomsen, T. (2000) Short cuts to dynamic factor demand modelling. Journal of Econometrics 97, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Transportation (1996) Productivity and Highway Network (www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/otps/060320b/index.htm).Google Scholar