Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T08:46:04.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF TAX ENFORCEMENT AND OPTIMAL MONETARY POLICY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

Marcelo Arbex
Marcelo Arbex*
Affiliation:
University of Windsor
*
Address correspondence to: Marcelo Arbex, Department of Economics, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario. N9B 3P4, Canada; e-mail: arbex@uwindsor.ca.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This paper explores the consequences of tax enforcement policies for monetary policy. Agents may evade taxes by working in the informal sector, but they are detected with positive probability. Workers are rewarded with government benefits that are proportional to formal (taxed) work. When enforcement is imperfect and collecting taxes is costly, the optimal inflation rate is positive and inflation becomes a second-best tax. Deviations from the Friedman rule are optimal and depend on the tax enforcement policies. Using U.S. data, we compute the quantitative effect of different tax structures on inflation and interest rate. We show that different tax enforcement and government spending (benefits) policies induce different optimal outcomes for inflation and interest rates.

Keywords

Optimal Interest RateTax EnforcementInformal EconomyTax Evasion

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 17 , Issue 5 , July 2013, pp. 1096 - 1117
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

References

REFERENCES

Aizenman, J. (1983) Government size, optimal inflation tax and tax collection costs. Eastern Economic Journal 9 (2), 103–105.Google Scholar
Allingham, M. and Sandmo, A. (1972) Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics 1, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J., Erard, B., and Feinstein, J. (1998) Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature 36, 818–860.Google Scholar
Antunes, A. and Cavalcanti, T. (2007) Start up costs, limited enforcement, and the hidden economy. European Economic Review 51 (1), 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbex, M. and Turdaliev, N. (2011) Optimal monetary and audit policy with imperfect taxation. Journal of Macroeconomics 33 (2), 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arseneau, D. (2007) The inflation tax in an open economy with imperfect competition. Review of Economic Dynamics 10, 126–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy 76 (2), 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busato, F. and Chiarini, B. (2004) Market and underground activities in a two-sector dynamic equilibrium model. Economic Theory 23, 831–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalcanti, T. and Villamil, A. (2003) Optimal inflation tax and structural reform. Macroeconomics Dynamics 7, 333–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chander, P. and Wilde, L. (1998) A general characterization of optimal income tax. Review of Economics Studies 65 (1), 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chari, V., Christiano, L., and Kehoe, P. (1991) Optimal fiscal and monetary policy: Some recent results. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 23 (3), 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chari, V., Christiano, L., and Kehoe, P. (1996) Optimality of the Friedman rule in economies with distorting taxes. Journal of Monetary Economics 37, 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chari, V.V. and Kehoe, P. (1999) Optimal fiscal and monetary policy. In: Taylor, J. B. and Woodford, M. (eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, vol. 1C, pp. 1671–1745. Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J. and Thum, M. (2005) Corruption and the shadow economy. International Economic Review 46 (3), 817–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chugh, S. K. (2009) Does the timing of the cash-in-advance constraint matter for optimal fiscal and monetary policy? Macroeconomic Dynamics 13, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fiore, F. (2000) The Optimal Inflation Tax When Taxes Are Costly to Collect. Working paper 38, European Central Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, W. (1993) How much do distortions affect growth? Journal of Monetary Economics 32, 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faia, E. (2008) Ramsey monetary policy with capital accumulation and nominal rigidities. Macroeconomic Dynamics 12, 90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, E., Jonhson, S., Kaufmann, D., and Zoido-Lobaton, P. (2000) Dodging the grabbing hand: the determinants of unofficial activity in 69 countries. Journal of Public Economics 76, 459–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1969) The optimum quantity of money. In Friedman, M. (ed.), The Optimum Quantity of Money and Other Essays, pp. 1–50. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Fugazza, M. and Jacques, J.F. (2003) Labor market institutions, taxation and the underground economy. Journal of Public Economics 88, 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Simon, Kaufmann, Daniel, and Zoido-Lobaton, Pablo (1998) Regulatory discretion and the unofficial economy. American Economic Review 88, 387–392.Google Scholar
Jones, L., Manuelli, R. and Rossi, P. (1997) On the optimal taxation of capital income. Journal of Economic Theory 73, 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, A. (2005) Year in review: Everson evaluates state of IRS, pledges strong agenda for 2005. Insurance Tax Review (Feb.), 288.Google Scholar
Koreshkova, T. (2006) A quantitative analysis of inflation as a tax on the underground economy. Journal of Monetary Economics 53, 773–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasa, S. and Villamil, A. (2000) Monitoring the Monitor: An Incentive Structure for a Financial Intermediary. Manuscript, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.Google Scholar
Lemieux, T., Fortin, B., and Frechette, P. (1994) The effect of taxes on labor supply in the underground economy. American Economic Review 84 (1), 231–254.Google Scholar
Marhuenda, F. and Ortuno-Ortin, I. (1997) Tax enforcement problems. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 9 (91), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, J. (1998) Tax evasion and the optimal inflation tax. Journal of Development Economics 55, 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2004a) Benefits and Wages: OECD Indicators. SourceOECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2004b) Recent Tax Policy Trends and Reforms in OECD Countries. SourceOECD, No. 9.Google Scholar
OECD (2004c) Tax Administration in OECD Countries: Comparative Information Series. SourceOECD.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. and Shavell, S. (2005) The Theory of Public Enforcement of Law. Working Paper 11780, NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, F. and Enste, D. (2000) Shadow economies: Size, cause and consequences. Journal of Economics Literature 38, 77–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slemrod, J. and Yitzhaki, S. (2002) Tax avoidance, evasion and administration. In Auerbach, J. and Feldstein, M. (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics, vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Turnovsky, S. and Basher, M. A. (2009) Fiscal policy and the structure of production in a two-sector developing economy. Journal of Development Economics 88, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vegh, C. (1989) Government Spending and Inflationary Finance: A Public Finance Approach. IMF Staff Paper 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yesin, A. (2004) Tax Collection Cost, Tax Evasion and Optimal Interest Rates. Working paper 04.02, Study Center Gerzensee.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuki, K. (2008) Sectoral shift, wealth distribution and development. Macroeconomic Dynamics 12, 527–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar