Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T12:26:48.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

STOCHASTIC CONVERGENCE ACROSS U.S. STATES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

Marcelo Mello
Marcelo Mello*
Affiliation:
Faculdades Ibmec/RJ
*
Address correspondence to: Marcelo Mello, Department of Economics, Faculdades Ibmec/RJ, Av. Presidente Wilson 118/1101, Rio de Janeiro, 20030-020, Brazil; e-mail: mmello@ibmecrj.br.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Unit root tests suggest that shocks to relative income across U.S. states are permanent, which contradicts the stochastic convergence hypothesis. We suggest that this finding is due to the well-known low-power problem of unit root tests in the presence of high persistence (i.e., low speed of convergence) and small samples. First, interval estimates of the largest autoregressive root for the relative income in the 48 U.S. contiguous states are quite wide, including many alternatives that are persistent but stable. Second, interval estimates of the half-life of relative income shocks that are robust to high persistence and small samples suggest that in most cases shocks die out within zero to ten years. Third, estimation of a fractionally integrated model for the relative income process suggests strong evidence of mean reversion in the data. These findings provide ample support for the stochastic convergence hypothesis.

Keywords

Stochastic ConvergenceHigh PersistenceLargest Autoregressive RootHalf-Life

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 160 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

References

REFERENCES

Baillie, R. (1996) Long memory processes and fractional integration in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 73, 5–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R.J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004) Economic Growth, 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bernard, A. and Durlauf, S. (1991) Convergence in International Output Movements. NBER working paper 3717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, A. and Durlauf, S. (1995) Convergence in international output. Journal of Applied Econometrics 10, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, A. and Durlauf, S. (1996) Interpreting tests of the convergence hypothesis. Journal of Econometrics 71, 161–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caner, M. and Killian, L. (2001) Size distortions of tests of the null hypothesis of stationarity: Evidence and implications for the PPP debate. Journal of International Money and Finance 20, 639–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlino, Gerald A. and Mills, Leonard (1993) Are U.S. regional incomes converging? Journal of Monetary Economics 32, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, Graham, Rothemberg, T., and Stock, J. (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64, 813–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geweke, J. and Porter-Hudak, S. (1983) The estimation and application of long memory time series models. Journal of Time Series Analysis 4, 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B. (1999) The grid bootstrap and the autoregressive model. Review of Economics and Statistics 81, 594–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mello, Marcelo and Guimarães-Filho, Roberto (2007) A note on fractional stochastic convergence. Economics Bulletin 16, 1–14.Google Scholar
Michelacci, Claudio and Zaffaroni, P. (2000) (Fractional) beta convergence. Journal of Monetary Economics 45, 129–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. and Ng, S. (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69, 1519–1554.Google Scholar
Pesaran, M.H. (2007) A pair-wise approach to testing for output and growth convergence. Journal of Econometrics 138, 312–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (1994) Time series with strong dependence. In Sims, C. (ed.), Advances in Econometrics, Sixth World Congress, pp. 47–96. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (1995) Log-periodogram regression of time series with long-range dependence. Annals of Statistics 23, 1048–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, K. (1996) The purchasing power parity puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature 34, 647–668.Google Scholar
Rossi, B. (2005) Confidence intervals for the half-life deviations from purchasing power parity. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 23, 432–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, James (1991) Confidence intervals for the largest autoregressive root in U.S. macroeconomic time series. Journal of Monetary Economics 28, 435–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar