Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T05:28:20.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE DURING THE ENERGY TRANSITION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2017

Gerard van der Meijden  and
Sjak Smulders
Gerard van der Meijden*
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Tinbergen Institute
Sjak Smulders
Affiliation:
Tilburg University and CESifo
*
Address correspondence to: Gerard van der Meijden, Department of Spatial Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; e-mail: g.c.vander.meijden@vu.nl.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The energy transition from fossil fuels to alternative energy sources has important consequences for technological change and resource extraction. We examine these consequences by incorporating a nonrenewable resource and an alternative energy source in a market economy model of endogenous growth through expanding varieties. During the energy transition, technological progress is nonmonotonic over time: It declines initially, starts increasing when the economy approaches the regime shift, and jumps down once the resource stock is exhausted. A moment of peak-oil does no longer necessarily occur, and simultaneous use of the resource and the alternative energy source will take place if the return to innovation becomes too low. Subsidies to research and development (R&D) and to renewables production speed up the energy transition, whereas a tax on fossil fuels postpones the switch to renewable energy.

Keywords

Alternative Energy SourcesEndogenous GrowthEnergy TransitionNonrenewable ResourcesTechnological Change

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , June 2018 , pp. 805 - 836
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Footnotes

We would like to thank Reyer Gerlagh, Jenny Ligthart, Rick van der Ploeg, Hiroaki Sakamoto, Ralph Winter, Cees Withagen, Aart de Zeeuw, and conference participants in Paris, Ascona, Prague, and Venice for helpful comments. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from FP7-IDEAS-ERC Grant No. 269788.

References

REFERENCES

Ang, J. B. and Madsen, J. B. (2015) What drives ideas production across the world? Macroeconomic Dynamics 19, 79–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E. (1999) Endogenous growth and natural resource scarcity. Environmental & Resource Economics 14 (1), 51–74.Google Scholar
Benchekroun, H. and Withagen, C. (2011) The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources: A complete characterization. Resource and Energy Economics 33 (3), 612–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BP (2015) BP Statistical Review of World Energy. London: BP p.l.c.Google Scholar
Bretschger, L. and Smulders, S. (2012) Sustainability and substitution of exhaustible natural resources: How structural change affects long-term R&D-investments. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 36 (4), 536–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravorty, U., Leach, A., and Moreaux, M. (2012) Cycles in nonrenewable resource prices with pollution and learning-by-doing. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 36 (10), 1448–1461.Google Scholar
Chen, X. (2017) Biased technical change, scale, and factor substitution in U.S. manufacturing industries. Macroeconomic Dynamics 21 (2), 488–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P. and Heal, G. (1974) The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies 41, 3–28.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. (1981) Resource depletion under technological uncertainty. Econometrica 49 (1), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A. K. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review 67 (3), 297–308.Google Scholar
Ethier, W. J. (1982) National and international returns to scale in the modern theory of international trade. American Economic Review 72 (3), 389–405.Google Scholar
Hoel, M. (1978) Resource extraction, substitute production, and monopoly. Journal of Economic Theory 19 (1), 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Energy Agency (2015a) Medium-Term Renewable Energy Report. Paris: IEA Publications.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (2015b) Projected Costs of Generating Electricity. Paris: IEA Publications.Google Scholar
Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N. L. (1978) Optimal exhaustible resource depletion with endogenous technical change. Review of Economic Studies 45 (1), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koetse, M. J., de Groot, H. L., and Florax, R. J. (2008) Capital-energy substitution and shifts in factor demand: A meta-analysis. Energy Economics 30 (5), 2236–2251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. (1973) The allocation of energy resources. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 4 (3), 529–576.Google Scholar
Roeger, W. (1995) Can imperfect competition explain the difference between primal and dual productivity measures? Estimates for U.S. manufacturing. Journal of Political Economy 103 (2), 316–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, P. M. (1987) Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. American Economic Review 77 (2), 56–62.Google Scholar
Romer, P. M. (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5), S71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, C. and Ziemes, G. (1999) Exhaustible resources, monopolistic competition, and endogenous growth. Environmental & Resource Economics 13 (2), 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinn, H.-W. (2008) Public policies against global warming: A supply side approach. International Tax and Public Finance 15 (4), 360–394.Google Scholar
Solow, R. M. (1974a) The economics of resources or the resources of Economics. American Economic Review 64 (2), 1–14.Google Scholar
Solow, R. M. (1974b) Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies 41, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, J. (1974a) Growth with exhaustible natural resources: Efficient and optimal growth paths. Review of Economic Studies 41, 123–137.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. (1974b) Growth with exhaustible natural resources: The competitive economy. Review of Economic Studies 41, 139–152.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. and Dasgupta, P. (1982) Market structure and resource depletion: A contribution to the theory of intertemporal monopolistic competition. Journal of Economic Theory 28 (1), 128–164.Google Scholar
Tahvonen, O. and Salo, S. (2001) Economic growth and transitions between renewable and nonrenewable energy resources. European Economic Review 45 (8), 1379–1398.Google Scholar
The Conference Board (2012) Total Economy Database. New York: The Conference Board, Inc.Google Scholar
Trimborn, T., Koch, K.-J., and Steger, T. M. (2008) Multidimensional transitional dynamics: A simple numerical procedure. Macroeconomic Dynamics 12 (03), 301–319.Google Scholar
Tsur, Y. and Zemel, A. (2003) Optimal transition to backstop substitutes for nonrenewable resources. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 27 (4), 551–572.Google Scholar
Tsur, Y. and Zemel, A. (2005) Scarcity, growth and R&D. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49 (3), 484–499.Google Scholar
Tsur, Y. and Zemel, A. (2011) On the dynamics of competing energy sources. Automatica 47 (7), 1357–1365.Google Scholar
Energy, U.S. Information Administration (2009) Performance Profiles of Major Energy Producers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
Energy, U.S. Information Administration (2012) International Energy Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
Energy, U.S. Information Administration (2015a) Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2015. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
Energy, U.S. Information Administration (2015b) Petroleum & Other Liquids Spot Prices. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
Valente, S. (2011) Endogenous growth, backstop technology adoption, and optimal jumps. Macroeconomic Dynamics 15 (03), 293–325.Google Scholar
Van der Meijden, G. and Smulders, J. (2017) Carbon lock-in: The role of expectations. International Economic Review, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Van der Ploeg, F. and Withagen, C. (2012a) Is there really a green paradox? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 64 (3), 342–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Ploeg, F. and Withagen, C. (2012b) Too much coal, too little oil. Journal of Public Economics 96 (1), 62–77.Google Scholar
Van der Ploeg, F. and Withagen, C. (2015) Global Warming and the green paradox: A review of adverse effects of climate policies. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 90 (2), 285–303.Google Scholar
Van der Werf, E. (2008) Production functions for climate policy modeling: An empirical analysis. Energy Economics 30 (6), 2964–2979.Google Scholar
World Bank (2015) World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar