Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T14:58:48.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TERM PREMIA IMPLICATIONS OF MACROECONOMIC REGIME CHANGES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2014

Giacomo Carboni
Giacomo Carboni*
Affiliation:
European Central Bank
*
Address correspondence to: Giacomo Carboni, European Central Bank, Kaiserstrasse 29, 60311 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; e-mail: giacomo.carboni@ecb.int.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Term premia are shown to provide crucial information for discriminating among alternative sources of change in the economy, namely shifts in the variance of structural shocks and in monetary policy. These sources have been identified as competing explanations for time-varying features of major industrial economies during the 1980s and 1990s. Although hardly distinguishable through the lens of standard dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models, lower nonpolicy shock variances and “tighter” monetary policy regimes imply higher and lower term premia, respectively. As a result, moving to tighter monetary policy alone cannot explain the improved U.S. macroeconomic stability in the 1980s and 1990s: term premia would have shifted downward, a fact inconsistent with the evidence of higher premia from early 80s onward. Conversely, favorable shifts in nonpolicy innovation variance imply movements in term premia that are at least qualitatively consistent with historical patterns.

Keywords

Term PremiaRegime SwitchingDSGE Models

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 251 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

References

REFERENCES

Amisano, G. and Tristani, O. (2010) A Nonlinear DSGE Model of the Term Structure with Regime Shifts. 2010 meeting paper 234, Society for Economic Dynamics.Google Scholar
Ang, A. and Piazzesi, M. (2003) A no-arbitrage vector autoregression of term structure dynamics with macroeconomic and latent variables. Journal of Monetary Economics 50, 745–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, J. and Perron, P. (1998) Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica 66, 47–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, J. and Perron, P. (2003) Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of Applied Econometrics 18 (1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekaert, G., Cho, S. and Moreno, A. (2010) New-Keynesian macroeconomics and the term structure. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 42 (1), 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benati, L. and Surico, P. (2009) VAR analysis and the Great Moderation. American Economic Review 99 (4), 1636–1652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, F. (2012) Regime Switches, Agents' Beliefs, and post-World War II U.S. Macroeconomic Dynamics. Working paper 120 (ERID), Duke University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bikbov, R. and Chernov, M. (2008) Monetary Policy Regimes and the Term Structure of Interest Rates. CEPR discussion paper 7096.Google Scholar
Calvo, G. (1983) Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. Journal of Monetary Economics 47, 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canova, F. and Sala, L. (2009) Back to square one: Identification issues in DSGE models. Journal of Monetary Economics 56 (4), 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarida, R., Galí, J., and Gertler, M. (1999) The science of monetary policy: A New Keynesian perspective. Journal of Economic Literature 37, 1661–1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarida, R., Gali, J., and Gertler, M. (2000) Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: Evidence and some theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (1), 147–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, J. H. and Piazzesi, M. (2005) Bond risk premia. American Economic Review 95 (1), 138–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davig, T. and Doh, T. (2009) Monetary Policy Regime Shifts and Inflation Persistence. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City working paper 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Negro, M. and Eusepi, S. (2011) Fitting observed inflation expectations. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35 (12), 2105–2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, R.E.A., Waggoner, D.F., and Zha, T. (2011) Minimal state variable solutions to Markov-switching rational expectations models. Journal of Economic and Dynamic Control 35 (12), 2150–2166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, J.D. (1989) A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica 57 (2), 357–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hördahl, P., Tristani, O., and Vestin, D. (2006) A joint econometric model of macroeconomic and term structure dynamics. Journal of Econometrics 131 (1–2), 405–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, C. and Nelson, C. (1999) Has the U.S. economy become more stable? A Bayesian approach based on a Markov-switching model of the business cycle. Review of Economics and Statistics 81 (4), 608–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, A. and Taylor, J.B. (2010) Falling Behind the Curve: A Positive Analysis of Stop–Start Monetary Policies and the Great Inflation. NBER working paper 15630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z., Wagonner, D.F., and Zha, T. (2011) Sources of macroeconomic fluctuations: A regime-switching DSGE approach. Quantitative Economics 2 (2), 251–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubik, T. and Schorfheide, F. (2004) Testing for indeterminacy: An application to U.S. monetary policy. American Economic Review 94 (1), 190–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, M.M. and Perez-Quiros, G. (2000) Output fluctuations in the United States: What has changed since the early 1980s? American Economic Review 90, 1464–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimark, P.K. (2008) Monetary policy with signal extraction from the bond market. Journal of Monetary Economics 55, 1389–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primiceri, G.E. (2005) Time varying structural vector autoregressions and monetary policy. Review of Economic Studies 72 (3), 821–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudebusch, G.D. and Swanson, E.T. (2008) Examining the bond premium puzzle with a DSGE model. Journal of Monetary Economics 55, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudebusch, G.D. and Swanson, E.T. (2009) The Bond Premium in a DSGE Model with Long-Run Real and Nominal Rsks. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco working paper 2008–31.Google Scholar
Rudebusch, G.D. and Wu, T. (2007) Accounting for a shift in term structure behavior with no-arbitrage and macro-finance models. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39 (2–3), 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schorfheide, F. (2005) Learning and monetary policy shifts. Review of Economic Dynamics 8, 392–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, C., Waggoner, D.F., and Zha, T. (2008) Methods for inference in large multiple-equation Markov-switching models. Journal of Econometrics 146, 113–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, C. and Zha, T. (2006) Were there regime switches in U.S. monetary policy? American Economic Review 96 (1), 54–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J.H. and Watson, M.W. (2003) Has the business cycle changed and why. In Gertler, Mark and Rogoff, Kenneth (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2002, pp. 159–218. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Woodford, M. (2003), Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, J.H. (2011) Term premia and inflation uncertainty: Empirical evidence from an international panel dataset. American Economic Review 101 (4), 1514–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, T. (2006) Macro factors and the affine term structure of interest rates. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 38 (7), 1847–1875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar