Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T15:51:51.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Context, Comparison, and Methodology in Chinese Management Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

John Child
John Child*
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In this paper, I accept Whetten's (2009) view that it is necessary to investigate Chinese management in a way that takes account of its context in order to assess the extent to which its features are context-specific or context-bounded. The first requirement, therefore, is to develop a way of conceptualising and measuring that context. A framework articulating material, ideational and institutional contextual features is offered to that end. Second, I argue that both ‘outside in’ and ‘inside out’ approaches to the study of Chinese management require comparison between China and other countries. Even a theory that claims uniqueness for China needs to have that claim tested through external comparison. We, therefore, have to employ a methodology that allows for valid comparisons between context and management in China and other countries. This paper focuses on these two issues of context and methodology with reference to comparative research. It examines them in turn and closes by arguing that the choice Barney and Zhang (2009) pose – between a Chinese theory of management and a theory of Chinese management – needs to be reframed within a more dynamic evolutionary perspective.

Keywords

Chinaco-evolutioncomparisoncontextideational systemsmaterial systemsmethodology中国共同演进比较情境观念系统物质系统方法论

Information

Type
Commentaries
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 2009, pp. 57 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2009

References

Barney, J. B., & Zhang, S. 2009. The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 15–28.Google Scholar
Bendix, R. 1956. Work and authority in industry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. 1969. On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4(2): 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boisot, M., Child, J., & Redding, G. 2009. Working the system: Towards a theory of cultural and institutional competence. International Studies of Management and Organization (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. 1977. The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Fan, R. M., Song, W., Zhang, J., & Zhang, J. 1996. Development of the Chinese personality assessment inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27(2): 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, J. 2000. Theorizing about organization cross-nationally. Advances in International Comparative Management, 13: 27–75.Google Scholar
Child, J., & Markoczy, L. 1993. Host-country managerial behaviour and learning in Chinese and Hungarian joint ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4): 611–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, J., & Tsai, T. 2005. The dynamic between firms' environmental strategies and institutional constraints in emerging economies: Evidence from China and Taiwan. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, J., & Tse, D. K. 2001. China's transition and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, F. L. 2008. Enterprise culture management in China: Insiders' perspective. Management and Organization Review, 4(2): 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deloitte, 2006. China's new accounting standards. New York: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. [Cited 15 October 2008.] Available from URL: http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/cda/doc/content/0607prcifrsenglish%281%29.pdfGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, L. 2001. The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, F. 2006. Exploring the interpersonal transaction of the Brazilian jeitinho in bureaucratic contexts. Organization, 13(4): 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, T. 2003. A critique of Hofstede's fifth national culture dimension. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3(3): 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, T. L. 2006. The world is flat: The globalized world in the twenty-first century. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Guillén, M. F. 2001. The limits of convergence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guo, X. 2008. Managing marketing practices in asymmetrical institutional duality: Evidence from British and Chinese MNC subsidiaries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. 2001. Varieties of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IACMR (International Association for Chinese Management Research). 2005. Inaugural Newsletter. [Cited 11 November 2008.] Available from URL: http://www.iacmr.org/Publications/Newsletter/newsletter_issue1.htm/.Google Scholar
Kerr, C., Dunlop, J., Harbison, F., & Myers, C. 1960. Industrialism and industrial man. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krug, B., & Hendrischke, H. 2008. Framing China: Transformation and institutional change through co-evolution. Management and Organization Review, 4(1): 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, P., & Edwards, V. 2000. Management in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ledeneva, A. V. 1998. Russia's economy of favours: Blat, networking, and informal exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P., & Carroll, T. N. 1999. The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10(5): 535–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, R. M. 2000. Weber's misunderstanding of traditional Chinese law. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2): 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, M. R. 1995. Diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3): 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohmae, K. 1995. The end of the nation state: The rise of regional economies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1966. Societies: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., & Hinings, C. R. 1969. An empirical taxonomy of structures of work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(1): 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Macdonald, K. M., Turner, C., & Lupton, T. 1963. A conceptual scheme for organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 8(3): 289–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C. 1968. Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1): 65–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralston, D. A., Pounder, J., Lo, C. W. H., Wong, Y.-Y., Egri, C. P., & Stauffer, J. 2006. Stability and change in managerial work values: A longitudinal study of China, Hong Kong, and the U.S. Management and Organization Review, 2(1): 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralston, D. A., Yu, K.-C., Wang, X., Terpstra, R. H., & He, W. 1996. The cosmopolitan Chinese manager: Findings of a study on managerial values across the six regions of China. Journal of International Management, 2(1): 79–109.Google Scholar
Redding, G. 1990. The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, G. 2005. The thick description and comparison of societal systems of capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2): 123–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, G. 2008. Separating culture from institutions: The use of semantic spaces as a conceptual domain and the case of China. Management and Organization Review, 4(2): 257–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, G., & Witt, M. A. 2007. The future of Chinese capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, S. B. 1996. Management in Brazil. In Warner, M. (Ed.), International encyclopaedia of business and management: 2673–2682. London: International Thompson Business Press.Google Scholar
Rostow, W. W. 1960. The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y. 2001. Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaede, U. 1995. The ‘Old Boy’ network and government-business relationships in Japan. Journal of Japanese Studies, 21(2): 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schluchter, W. 1981. The rise of western rationalism: Max Weber's developmental history. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Shapiro, D. L., Von Glinow, M. A., & Xiao, Z. 2007. Toward polycontextually sensitive research methods. Management and Organization Review, 3(1): 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, C.J., & Warner, J. T. 1992. Matchmaker, matchmaker: The effect of old boy networks on job match quality, earnings, and tenure. Journal of Labor Economics, 10(3): 306–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. B., Misumi, J., Tayeb, M., Peterson, M., & Bond, M. 1989. On the generality of leadership style measures across cultures. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62(2): 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2004. Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(4): 491–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2006. Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J. L. 1997. Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations, 24(1): 56–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S., Nifadkar, S. S., & Ou, A. Y. 2007. Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations. Journal of Management, 33(3): 426–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Trade Representative (USTR). 2007. 2007 Report to Congress on China's WTO compliance. Washington DC: USTR. [Cited 15 November 2008.] Available from URL: http://www.ustr.gov/assets/Document_Library/Reports_Publications/2007/asset_upload_file625_13692.pdfGoogle Scholar
Van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. 1996. Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H. & Pandey, J. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, vol. 1: 257–300. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1964. The theory of social and economic organization (trans, by Henderson, A. M. & Parsons, T.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A. 2009. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 29–55.Google Scholar
Whitley, R. 1999. Divergent capitalisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zattoni, A., & Cuomo, F. 2008. Why adopt codes of good governance? A comparison of institutional and efficiency perspectives. Corporate Governance, 16(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar