Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T18:07:43.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Huang's Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Yasheng Huang*
Affiliation:
Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Beamish and Delios write an eminently reasonable review. I agree that the environment for private sector has improved. Selling China describes some of these developments (pp. 202-204) and predicts that the overall role of FDI will decline, which is exacdy what happened. The FDI/domestic private investment ratio has fallen. This decline is the other side of the mirror as the rising ratio: suppressing the domestic private sector, everything else being equal, can raise this ratio; supporting it can reduce this ratio. There are no logical or empirical inconsistencies. I believe that I overstated the ideological rigidity of the Chinese state and that I was vague in specifying the ideological constraints. In the 1990s, the ideology was of an industrial policy kind, rather than Communism.

Information

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2005