Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T04:52:51.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reflections on the Commentaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2015

John Child and
Svetla Marinova
John Child
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham, UKUniversity of Plymouth, UKLingnan University, ChinaSun Yat-sen University, China
Svetla Marinova
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Our paper (Child & Marinova, 2014) argues the need for an analytical framework that takes both home and host country contexts into account, and the implications that different alignments between such contexts have for the strategies and requisite capabilities of foreign-investing firms. The four commentaries on the paper raise important issues that further the discussion of context and strategy in the globalization of firms. They pose fundamental questions concerning the conceptualization of context, the role of culture in such conceptualization, the linking of levels of analysis (abstract and concrete, macro and micro), and the potential for theoretical generalization from the particular case of Chinese globalizing firms.

Information

Type
Response
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , November 2014, pp. 405 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2014

References

Child, J., & Marinova, S. 2014. The role of contextual combinations in the globalization of Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 10(3): 347–371.Google Scholar
Leung, K. 2014. Globalization of Chinese firms: What happens to culture? Management and Organization Review, 10(3): 391–397.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. E. 2014. What the fox says, how the fox works: Deep contextualization as a source of new research agendas and theoretical insights. Management and Organization Review, 10(3): 373–380.Google Scholar
Murmann, J. P. 2014. Reflections on choosing the appropriate level of abstraction in social science research. Management and Organization Review, 10(3): 381–389.Google Scholar
Redding, G. 2014. The unexamined differences in dreams: Chinese firms’ globalization and interface challenges. Management and Organization Review, 10(3): 399–404.Google Scholar