Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T00:06:30.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An insertion operator preserving infinite reduction sequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

DAVID CHEMOUIL
DAVID CHEMOUIL*
Affiliation:
c/o Équipe Acadie, Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, 118, route de Narbonne, 31 062 Toulouse cedex 4, France Email: chemouil@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

A common way to show the termination of the union of two abstract reduction systems, provided both systems terminate, is to prove that they enjoy a specific property (some sort of ‘commutation’ for instance). This specific property is actually used to show that, for the union not to terminate, one of the systems must itself be non-terminating, which leads to a contradiction. Unfortunately, the property may be impossible to prove because some of the objects that are reduced do not enjoy an adequate form.

Hence the purpose of this paper is threefold:

  • – First, it introduces an operator enabling us to insert a reduction step on such an object, and therefore to change its shape, while still preserving the ability to use the property. Of course, some new properties will need to be verified.

  • – Second, as an instance of our technique, the operator is applied to relax a well-known lemma stating the termination of the union of two termination abstract reduction systems.

  • – Finally, this lemma is applied in a peculiar and then in a more general way to show the termination of some lambda calculi with inductive types augmented with specific reductions dealing with:

    1. (i) copies of inductive types;

    2. (ii) the representation of symmetric groups.

Information

Type
Paper
Information
Mathematical Structures in Computer Science , Volume 18 , Special Issue 4: Isomorphisms of types and invertibility of lambda terms , August 2008 , pp. 693 - 728
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

References

Baader, F. and Nipkow, T. (1998) Term Rewriting and All That, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachmair, L. and Dershowitz, N. (1986) Commutation, transformation, and termination. In: Siekmann, J.H. (ed.) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Automated Deduction (Oxford, England). Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science 230 5–20.Google Scholar
Barendregt, H.P. (1984) The Lambda Calculus – Its Syntax and Semantics, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Chemouil, D. (2005) Isomorphisms of simple inductive types through extensional rewriting. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 15 (5)875–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemouil, D. and Soloviev, S. (2003) Remarks on isomorphisms of simple inductive types. In: Geuvers, H. and Kamareddine, F. (eds.) Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Cosmo, R. (1995) Isomorphisms of Types: From λ-Calculus to Information Retrieval and Language Design, Progress in Theoretical Computer Science, Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Cosmo, R. (1996a) A brief history of rewriting with extensionality. In: Kamareddine, F. (ed.) International Summer School on Type Theory and Rewriting (slides).Google Scholar
Di Cosmo, R. (1996b) On the power of simple diagrams. In: Ganzinger, H. (ed.) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA-96). Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1103 200–214.Google Scholar
Di Cosmo, R. and Kesner, D. (1993) Simulating expansions without expansions. Technical Report RR-1911, INRIA.Google Scholar
Di Cosmo, R. and Kesner, D. (1996a) Combining algebraic rewriting, extensional lambda calculi, and fixpoints. Theoretical Computer Science 169 (2)201–220.Google Scholar
Di Cosmo, R. and Kesner, D. (1996b) Rewriting with extensional polymorphic lambda-calculus. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doornbos, H. and von Karger, B. (1998) On the union of well-founded relations. Logic Journal of the IGPL 6 (2)195–201.Google Scholar
Flegontov, A. and Soloviev, S. (2002) Type theory in differential equations. In: VIII International Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics Research (ACA'02), Moscow.Google Scholar
Geser, A. (1990) Relative Termination, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Passau, Germany.Google Scholar
Girard, J.-Y., Lafont, Y. and Taylor, P. (1988) Proofs and Types, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science 7, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lengrand, S. (2005) Induction principles as the foundation of the theory of normalisation: Concepts and techniques. Technical report, PPS laboratory, Université Paris 7. (Available at http://hal.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ccsd-00004358.)Google Scholar
Matthes, R. (2000) Lambda calculus: A case for inductive definitions. Lecture notes for ESSLLI'2000 (European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information).Google Scholar
Soloviev, S. and Chemouil, D. (2004) Some algebraic structures in lambda-calculus with inductive types. In: Berardi, S., Coppo, M. and Damiani, F. (eds.) Proc. Types'03. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3085.Google Scholar
Terese, (2003) Term Rewriting Systems, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science 55, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar